Originally Posted by
geysir
The 100k is being assumed to be a bridging loan, as if it's a truth, however as Chair remarked near the end, only a scrupulous forensic analysis of the bookkeeping could confirm the FAI story.
A more believable scenario is that it wasn't a loan, but resting out of sight out of mind, therefore only a small clique knew about it, the rush to the high court and the subsequent sealed lips not sinking the FAI ship.
On the other hand, in early 2017 the FAI could have been cash strapped, needed a bridge loan and they have just reacted as per their norm, haughty, arrogant, secretive and with disdain.
Bookmarks