Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 27 of 31 FirstFirst ... 172526272829 ... LastLast
Results 521 to 540 of 617

Thread: Republic of Ireland V Oman 3rd September 2014 & Georgia 7th September 2014

  1. #521
    Capped Player
    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,333
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,737
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,827
    Thanked in
    1,928 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SwanVsDalton View Post
    Slight deflection but big result, it gave it all that dip and spin. Was off the back of Ward or O'Shea (can't remember who was directly in front of the shot) but they discussed it quite a bit on Sky at HT, which I was watching in RTE-less Belfast.
    I thought the shot deflected off the back of a Georgian, what else could explain the movement of the ferociously hit ball except a deflection of sorts.
    Forde correctly positioned off his line had no chance and I doubt there's a player on the planet now who could have saved it.
    A goalie would need the elastic agility of a Peter Bonetti to adjust and have a chance to make the save and they don't exist nowadays. Henry in 2006 scored past Given in his prime with (imo) a similar but much more saveable shot.

    edit, I see that Joe has already made a similar point in his reply.

  2. #522
    Seasoned Pro SwanVsDalton's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Derry - London - Belfast
    Posts
    3,309
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    770
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,259
    Thanked in
    675 Posts
    Indeed, it was the Georgian striker. Had thought it was a defender but they still wern't close enough to the shot to even get a touch on it (boom boom).
    Ou-est le Centre George Pompidou?

  3. #523
    International Prospect tricky_colour's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Nottingham.
    Posts
    8,886
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,682
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    898
    Thanked in
    621 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr A View Post
    Agreed. Thunderous dipping shot, damn all he could do about it.
    Nonsense, if he has been standing on a bar stool by the left hand post he would probably have saved it.

  4. #524
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by OwlsFan View Post
    It is a bit like a continuation of the Trap era with the Hoolahan debate. Fans seem to love him. Managers don't.
    There must be something to it. Fans don't have to worry a hoot about the responsibilities a manager does; they have the luxury to be idealistic (or reckless and irresponsible).

  5. Thanks From:


  6. #525
    Capped Player
    Joined
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,925
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,880
    Thanked in
    2,796 Posts
    Was there really a deflection? My instinct in real time was that it had to have been but in the replays it looked like a clean hit. I just thought Forde didn't take a step sideways because he thought at the moment it was struck that it was going over. If he had anticipated the top spin he'd have taken a simple step to his left and tipped it over.

    That's how I saw it, no deflection. Happy to be corrected though.

  7. #526
    Capped Player
    Joined
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,925
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,880
    Thanked in
    2,796 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DannyInvincible View Post
    There must be something to it. Fans don't have to worry a hoot about the responsibilities a manager does; they have the luxury to be idealistic (or reckless and irresponsible).
    I think O'Neill does rate Hoolahan. O'Neill himself said afterwards that he had overrated the opposition which explains the cautious selection. I'd be surprised if Hoolahan doesn't start several of the remaining non-Gibraltar games. He was brilliant against Italy showing he can press high up the pitch more effectively than anyone else. He put to bed the notion that he's a luxury player only of use in possession.

  8. #527
    Seasoned Pro SwanVsDalton's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Derry - London - Belfast
    Posts
    3,309
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    770
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,259
    Thanked in
    675 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuttgart88 View Post
    Was there really a deflection? My instinct in real time was that it had to have been but in the replays it looked like a clean hit. I just thought Forde didn't take a step sideways because he thought at the moment it was struck that it was going over. If he had anticipated the top spin he'd have taken a simple step to his left and tipped it over.

    That's how I saw it, no deflection. Happy to be corrected though.
    I thought there was. It definitely appears to just take a little nick off the back of the Georgian striker and the Sky guys certainly analysed it enough. It also helps explain the fairly crazy dip.
    Ou-est le Centre George Pompidou?

  9. #528
    Banned. Children Banned. Grandchildren Banned. 3 Months. Charlie Darwin's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,577
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,890
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,310
    Thanked in
    3,368 Posts
    Judge for yourselves:


  10. #529
    Capped Player
    Joined
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,925
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,880
    Thanked in
    2,796 Posts
    Deflection and Forde is blameless. No deflection and I'd be critical, but objectively so.

    Speaking of deflections, we were lucky a Georgian shot in the first half came off the inside of O'Shea's leg yet still managed to go further wide. Almost every time I've ever seen an inside leg deflection it's trouble.

  11. #530
    Capped Player
    Joined
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,925
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,880
    Thanked in
    2,796 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie Darwin View Post
    Judge for yourselves:

    Ah, ok. So it hot the 9 in the back (edit: upper left arm?) which is what put the top spin on it? Not conclusive but quite likely.

    Forde's post-goal reaction was one of surprise. I can relate to that. Keepers react almost instantaneously to a shot, in terms of judging angles etc. It did look like Forde set himself as if there was no danger and then all of a sudden there was.

    No. 9 didn't flinch though, which I'd expect if he'd been hit, but it was probably a graze more than anything else.
    Last edited by Stuttgart88; 08/09/2014 at 8:33 PM.

  12. #531
    Capped Player DeLorean's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Hill Valley
    Posts
    10,894
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,419
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,281
    Thanked in
    2,081 Posts
    Yeah I'm the exact same as Stutts on this. If there is a deflection it changes everything. To be fair it would explain the crazy dip so ye're probably right. It takes a hell of a lot away from the goal itself also if it is the case. God knows where it would have ended up without the nick, even if it is a slight one.

  13. #532
    Banned. Children Banned. Grandchildren Banned. 3 Months. Charlie Darwin's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,577
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,890
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,310
    Thanked in
    3,368 Posts
    I'd say #9 did flinch. He looks like somebody who, if he wasn't grazed by the ball, was very close to it. With the power in that shot, all it would take is a skim to go off course like that.

  14. #533
    Capped Player
    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,333
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,737
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,827
    Thanked in
    1,928 Posts
    Strange that we now expect an unparalleled (in the universe) standard of goalkeeping from an old timer and an away performance against an east european nation far surpassing anything that we have managed before, since the break up of the USSR. MON and Keano should put in for raise.

  15. #534
    Capped Player
    Joined
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,925
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,880
    Thanked in
    2,796 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DeLorean View Post
    Yeah I'm the exact same as Stutts on this. If there is a deflection it changes everything. To be fair it would explain the crazy dip so ye're probably right. It takes a hell of a lot away from the goal itself also if it is the case. God knows where it would have ended up without the nick, even if it is a slight one.
    And it completely changes the impending lucky manager accusations! David Kelly and the Indo sports department have probably already compiled a list of reasons why O'Neill is a lucky manager, discrediting our 100pc record after 7 games.

    Caught the World Champions on a wet night, Poland's players didn't like their away strip, our critical 6th goal against Gibraltar was offside, Marshall's blatant upending of Shane Long in the penalty box drew an unsportsmanlike appeal for a penalty from Robbie Brady...

  16. #535
    Banned. Children Banned. Grandchildren Banned. 3 Months. Charlie Darwin's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,577
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,890
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,310
    Thanked in
    3,368 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuttgart88 View Post
    And it completely changes the impending lucky manager accusations! David Kelly and the Indo sports department have probably already compiled a list of reasons why O'Neill is a lucky manager, discrediting our 100pc record after 7 games.
    He's also cowardly.

  17. #536
    Capped Player
    Joined
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,925
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,880
    Thanked in
    2,796 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by geysir View Post
    Strange that we now expect an unparalleled (in the universe) standard of goalkeeping from an old timer and an away performance against an east european nation far surpassing anything that we have managed before, since the break up of the USSR. MON and Keano should put in for raise.
    I am with you in spirit but our record in ex-USSR is decent. Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Armenia, Georgia, even Mother Russia herself. No worries there. Hungary and our last outing in Bulgaria were decent destinations, and Albania wasn't a disaster.

    Our record in ex-Jug of Saliva is much less impressive.

    There's Eastern Europe and Yugoslav Eastern Europe!

    Is it really that critical to have thought Forde should have saved that shot without having seen the deflection? I think we have reasonable expectations of Forde.
    Last edited by Stuttgart88; 08/09/2014 at 8:32 PM.

  18. Thanks From:


  19. #537
    International Prospect Kingdom's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Teeing off
    Posts
    5,034
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6,659
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,071
    Thanked in
    634 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuttgart88 View Post

    Is it really that critical to have thought Forde should have saved that shot without having seen the deflection? I think we have reasonable expectations of Forde.
    Just to say, I'm not calling for Forde's head as a result of that goal going in; it's because I feel Westwood is the better keeper, and that if we're to use the ball better from the last line of defence (or first line of offence) then Westwood is the man, while also being the better keeper.
    Here they come! It’s the charge of the “Thanks” Brigade!

  20. #538
    International Prospect tricky_colour's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Nottingham.
    Posts
    8,886
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,682
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    898
    Thanked in
    621 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DeLorean View Post
    Yeah I'm the exact same as Stutts on this. If there is a deflection it changes everything. To be fair it would explain the crazy dip so ye're probably right. It takes a hell of a lot away from the goal itself also if it is the case. God knows where it would have ended up without the nick, even if it is a slight one.
    I have it down loaded in HD and watching on VLC player, they used to have a good frame advance and slow motion
    on it but that seem to have been removed. I can't see a deflection (does not appear to hit anyone) but it does look
    like there was one, seems to be sliced one way and then move back the other, maybe the effects of wind and spin.
    Pretty unsavable really as it is only at reachable height when it crosses the goal line.
    I think maybe he should be on the goal line and closer to his left had post.

  21. #539
    Capped Player
    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Maígh Eó
    Posts
    16,378
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,602
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,040
    Thanked in
    846 Posts
    Having seen fordes position and being right behind the goal for their goal it looked like he curled it - no deflection. when watched after on the the telly it looked more like he got his boot under it on the lips, looks can be deceiving though - forde was too slow and his positional awareness was all over the shop so he was never going to be able adjust himself quick enough he hasn't that agility or ability.
    I'm a bloke,I'm an ocker
    And I really love your knockers,I'm a labourer by day,
    I **** up all me pay,Watching footy on TV,
    Just feed me more VB,Just pour my beer,And get my smokes, And go away

  22. Thanks From:


  23. #540
    Coach tetsujin1979's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Dublin, originally from Limerick
    Posts
    23,250
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,127
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,291
    Thanked in
    3,500 Posts
    Of course, McGeady has previous in turns like that: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1h...-rangers_sport
    All goals, yellow and red cards tweeted in real time on mastodon, BlueSky and facebook

  24. Thanks From:


Page 27 of 31 FirstFirst ... 172526272829 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 605
    Last Post: 13/09/2016, 8:38 AM
  2. Replies: 683
    Last Post: 13/09/2016, 8:31 AM
  3. Replies: 682
    Last Post: 01/09/2016, 11:46 AM
  4. Replies: 604
    Last Post: 29/08/2016, 12:34 PM
  5. Replies: 612
    Last Post: 25/08/2016, 12:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •