I know its moving a bit off-topic but hey! until 2nd legs why not figure out why we as a league could be sending clubs off to the other side of the world.
Interesting read Danny! As a former Soviet region it could be assumed that they would have been a stronger footballing nation than many in the AFC; going on current FIFA rankings they would be 21st from 46 nations in the AFC as opposed to being 48th from 53 as UEFA members. Crude way of comparisons I suppose but they may have been the bigger fish in a small sea with greater chances of some relative success. They have no chance of any qualification with UEFA for the foreseable future. So I wonder why they wanted to change from this perspective. Financial benefits may be the only real incentive I can think of. For travel the AFC Champions League is zoned East/West to keep costs down.
When Australia were parachuted in to AFC in 2006, New Zealand became the big guns of the OFC and have a much better chance of getting to the World Cup via a play-off which they won 2010 - which is an extreme version of what I was getting at by saying Kazakhstan could be more sucessful with the AFC. Im not going to try a similar comparisons with various leagues As dont know how you can really.
Bookmarks