Last year it was €130,000 for that round
http://www.uefa.org/about-uefa/news/newsid=1979895.html
Oriel park would be a sell out too, further off-setting the (extremely high) costs. They wouldn't lose money
54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
---
New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/
Since everybody exemplifies the hardship of travelling in european competitions with kazakh clubs, on what basis were they admitted to UEFA? They are not in Europe, are not in the middle of a conflict that prevents them from playing against their neighbours like Israel is, they are not much better than their continental opponents making their continent's competitions useless like it happened with Australia. I have absolutely no clue of what happened back then when UEFA allowed them in since european teams gain absolutely nothing from playing against kazakh sides. If they were allowed in, I will suggest that the brazilian federation should apply to join UEFA, our clubs would benefit from competing in UCL and EL and definitely the Brazilian national team would be a great addition to the Euros (Germany would be specially rejoicing on this). I bet we are closer to most european countries than Kazakhstan is.
A leading authority on League of Ireland football since 2003. You're probably wrong.
May have something to do with the league Kazakh clubs were playing in or the national association they were members of prior to the break up of the USSR, Soviet Eurasian sides competed in UEFA legitimately then and i presume were simply allowed contunue to do so as an independent league? My guess without looking in to it.
*or as Sheridan says![]()
Last edited by Nesta99; 18/07/2014 at 3:58 PM.
For clubs who are located in a region where planes are available for charter and who have a large enough fan base, that 150 or so will fill out the seats to take the burden of the costs, then it's not so bad I suppose with a bit of preplanning. Still it's a lot to organise inside a few days.
Last season an (almost) amateur Icelandic club was paired with a Kazakh team in the 3rd round, it was a costly and lengthy adventure.
This season, FH travelled to Belarusia, commercial flight to Copenhagen, connecting flight to Warsaw and bussed the rest of the way across the border. You'd want to be returning home with something to smile about. I suppose the last thing they would want to hear about is someone questioning their mental and physical fortitude in the last 5 minutes when playing full time pro teams from a league a few steps up the quality ladder.
Duno how we didn't score last night. Split sat back as soon as they scored and we really should have punished them on more than one occasion. Guna be very hard to get through now going to a stadium were the fans will create a big hostile atmosphere for our lot.
Well they have nothing to lose whereas Hadjuk could be a bit cagey 1st competative home match. Any sort of counter attacking with menace could rattle them a piece. I get the impression that they are quite an expectant crowd who'd get on players backs quick enough. They're a young side too. SK has the experience of going to PSG. I dont think the big noisey crowd will bother us as much as the heat and the way they get on to the breaking ball so quickly.
The Ocean FM boys felt threatened the Norwie media were so cross, they are going mental on their forum calling us a Publagtem or pub team which made me cross until I thought about it. Say a Norwegian pub team has between players, subs, manager, and hangers on about twenty men, over here the publican would expect each player to spend a few quid each week so on the conservative side, each man has 15 pints x 18€ = 270, five bags of local tayto x 4.00€ = €20, a burger and chips or a pizza twice a week 2 x 38€ = 76, so that is if you are reasonable about €350 a week per man by 20 is seven grand add in insurance and bus hire and kit and washing it and remember the vast distances in Norway a Publag would have a budget of about 10k a week which is not far off or in excess of many LOI clubs.
Dundalk seemed to give Hadjuk an enormous levity in front of their back four, like the midfield didn't drop back at all, inexperience, only Pats it seems can do it consistently and play to their normal level in Europe, cooly conceived and taken goal. Hard to judge Dundalk from the Hadjuk stream, gang of minks were they?
Originally Kazakhstan played in the Asian football Confederation. It chose to move to UEFA in 2002
In all other Olympic sports, Kazakhstan remains part of Asia and goes through their qualification routes.
I'd guess the money earned from UEFA is a lot more than AFC. Shouldn't be allowed though IMO
54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
---
New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/
It's an interesting one alright, so I've set myself a topic for research... You say Kazakhstan is not in Europe, but would you say it's indisputably Asian? Why the Kazakh association opted to join the Asian confederation in 1992 is surely as valid a question as asking why they decided to join UEFA in 2002. Maybe it was a means of asserting their independence or separateness from the USSR and Russian influence? Russia, of course, succeeded the USSR and remained a UEFA member. Or did UEFA perhaps deny Kazakhstan access back then? I'm not sure...
And does "everyone" actually make an issue of Kazakhstan's supposed remoteness? Do other UEFA members and clubs on continental Europe complain about it? I'm not necessarily saying they don't; it's just that you presume they do with such seeming certainty. Surely Kazakhstan's admission in 2002 would have required broad support across the board of UEFA members at the time, so the potential travel difficulties posed by their then-prospective membership can hardly have been an over-riding issue for "everyone" at the time.
Article 5 of UEFA's regulations states that membership "is open to national football associations situated in the continent of Europe", but it does not identify how UEFA define the continent's boundaries. Who does define the continent's boundaries? The same article also outlines that "in exceptional circumstances, a national football association that is situated in another continent may be admitted to membership, provided that it is not a member of the Confederation of that continent, or of any other Confederation, and that FIFA approves its membership of UEFA". Likewise, UEFA once again fail to define here what amounts to an exceptional circumstance.
The hardship of travelling to Kazakhstan is of course amplified from an Irish perspective as we find ourselves at the very western tip of the European continent whilst Kazakhstan is to the continent's very far east. It perhaps seems unfamiliar and distant to western Europeans because we have very little day-to-day connection or interaction with it, but doesn't Kazakhstan associate culturally with (at the very least, eastern) Europe, especially Russia? The Soviet Union, of which Kazakhstan was part, was an integral member of UEFA. Surely, Kazakhstan would have as much of a case for UEFA membership as the likes of Russia, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia? Furthermore, drawing the likes of Tom Tomsk, Luch-Energiya Vladivostok or Sakhalin Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk from Russia - if they were ever to qualify for European competition - would see western European clubs having to travel much further east than they'd ever have to were they to draw a Kazakh club.
Turkey, Cyprus and Israel are similarly geographically-Asian, but their participation in UEFA is broadly accepted. These countries share a cultural-historical affinity with Europe; the state of Israel is predominantly European-derived and so wholeheartedly aligns itself with Europe and the West rather than with its immediate Arab neighbours. Kazakhstan doesn't identify predominantly with, say, China to its east, or am I mistaken? It might not be a member of the Council of Europe, but, then, neither is Israel. I guess what I'm saying is that geo-political boundaries can be rather blurred; there are no hard and fast rules or criteria that will offer surefire guidance as to what constitutes a definitively European country or as to which characteristics, in spite of the existence of the aforementioned regulations, definitively entitle an association to UEFA membership.
Importantly, it must, however, be noted that Kazakhstan has never participated in the critical matter of a Eurovision Song Contest!(Its state television company K-1 is negotiating to join the European Broadcasting Union, mind.)
Anyway, I've done a bit of reading around it all and managed to unearth some informative material, mainly with the aid of this thread on Boards.ie. Here's some information from the UEFA website on Kazakhstan's accession to UEFA: http://www.uefa.com/memberassociatio...id=945252.html
And the text of a Reuters report presumably from around 2001 or 2002 covering their then-intention to leave the AFC: http://www.aliraqi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=17Originally Posted by UEFA.com
According to this, they'd been trying to gain UEFA membership since 1996: http://www.espnfc.com/europe/news/20...azakhstan.htmlOriginally Posted by Reuters
Here's the take of James Dart of the Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/football/...nowledge.sportOriginally Posted by ESPN
Hope that provides some answers!Originally Posted by James Dart
![]()
Last edited by DannyInvincible; 19/07/2014 at 11:11 AM.
The way things are going with Irish football of late, the League of Ireland will soon be ranked better in Europe than the national team are.
LOI are 40th and Ireland are 35th.
Edit: Typo.
Last edited by gufcfan; 19/07/2014 at 11:50 PM.
Bookmarks