Sadlier in today's Indo

**bennocelt** · 21/08/2013, 2:13 PM

Originally Posted by Dodge

To be fair, a lot of it is perception. The league has been going for 90+ years and every weeks thousands go to see their teams. For most, they go and enjoy themselves (even if sadomasochists).

The clubs would be far better off saying "look we're here, we're not going away, now either join the party or shut up" to all the people who can't wait to see the league fail.

As long as clubs can pay their way, and people get entertainment each week, the league will be fine.

Stop comparing it to GAA or EPL and enjoy it for what it is.

Its hard to be constantly compared to the EPL. Wondering is the LOI getting similar crowds to nations with the same co efficients on the uefa table (ie small time leagues)- Estonia, Iceland, Montengro, Malta, Finland, etc? Without looking Id say we are.

**gormacha** · 21/08/2013, 2:22 PM

Originally Posted by Dodge

enjoy it for what it is.

I love it for its quirkiness, and not despite it.

**wonder88** · 21/08/2013, 3:09 PM

The league always had poor enough crowds. I remember the takings of a Shelbourne game in Tolka being stolen in a raid and the sum of money was 100 pounds, I think it was in the 1980's. Costs have gone up a lot in the last two decades, with bigger squads, medical expenses etc, ask anyone involved with a GAA club know how much more difficult it is now to field teams.

**Closed Account 2** · 21/08/2013, 3:51 PM

Originally Posted by bennocelt

Its hard to be constantly compared to the EPL. Wondering is the LOI getting similar crowds to nations with the same co efficients on the uefa table (ie small time leagues)- Estonia, Iceland, Montengro, Malta, Finland, etc? Without looking Id say we are.

http://comparetheleagues.com/

Looks like the average attendance is above Estonia, below Finland, can't compare with other leagues as they are not on the list... But to be fair to Estonia it's population is only a quarter of Ireland's.

**Dodge** · 21/08/2013, 3:55 PM

Originally Posted by wonder88

The league always had poor enough crowds. I remember the takings of a Shelbourne game in Tolka being stolen in a raid and the sum of money was 100 pounds, I think it was in the 1980's. Costs have gone up a lot in the last two decades, with bigger squads, medical expenses etc, ask anyone involved with a GAA club know how much more difficult it is now to field teams.

Shels moved out of Harold's Cross for the 1989/90 season (replaced by Pats for a little while)

**Sean South** · 21/08/2013, 4:48 PM

Originally Posted by Dodge

To be fair, a lot of it is perception. The league has been going for 90+ years and every weeks thousands go to see their teams. For most, they go and enjoy themselves (even if sadomasochists). There is FAR too much naval gazing within some LOI circles.

There's loads of problems with the clubs, but there's loads of good points too. Continually focussing on the negative and trying and justify their existence to shtehawks like sadlier who wouldn't **** on the league if he wasn't being paid to watch the games is counter-productive IMO

The clubs would be far better off saying "look we're here, we're not going away, now either join the party or shut up" to all the people who can't wait to see the league fail.

As long as clubs can pay their way, and people get entertainment each week, the league will be fine.

Stop comparing it to GAA or EPL and enjoy it for what it is.

Would you go away with that common sense post and let Peadar1987 write a long post for the 2233rd time about what the "league" should do to make it a top top league.

**peadar1987** · 21/08/2013, 5:24 PM

Originally Posted by Sean South

Would you go away with that common sense post and let Peadar1987 write a long post for the 2233rd time about what the "league" should do to make it a top top league.

That's a load of crap. I also write long posts about Termonbarry and wall construction.

**ArdeeBhoy** · 21/08/2013, 10:27 PM

Richie S suddenly gets 'famous'...

**TonyD** · 22/08/2013, 8:15 PM

Originally Posted by Strongbow10

Players like McClean, Long, Fahey, Doyle, Forde will never be in the top bracket of players. They simply went to UK to late. The made good careers for themselves but after making an initial splash, they plateau in terms of develeopment. Their glass ceiling is alot lower so to speak. This is mainly due to the level of coaching received in Ireland in their formative years.

Seamus Coleman is the excpetion, he has the makings of a top quality full back.

Players like this in the LOI are the exception to the rule. Fans know this is the exception to the norm. Lets do something to make this more "the norm". As for fans not paying attention even if there was a young Lionel Messi in our league? Such is the gulf in quality of coaching across the water, all of our top young talent have departed the island by the time they are 16.

I personally know myself that the level of coaching is on another planet over there. And keep in mind the UK is seen as one of the more backward countries in terms of new methods.

We simply need to treble the number of coaches (Pro licence qualified). Build from the very bottom.

I wouldn't disagree too much with most of that. Except to say that as recent international players all of the names mentioned are clearly in the top 20-25 Irish players of the past few years. So exactly what standard are players required to reach in this league before they are "worth" going to watch ? Do you expect us to develop a whole raft of top drawer european standard players ? Do you realise how unlikely that is, even with improved coaching ? And even if we did, I ask again, how are the general public going to discover how good these players are before they inevitably go to England anyway ? Because you can be damn sure they won't bother going along to find out for themselves, and the media are equally unlikely to develop any interest.

Don't misunderstand me, I'm not for one second arguing that we shouldn't try to improve coaching and the quality of player in the league. Of course we should, and I'd love to see it. But it's a red herring to suggest that quality of player is the reason attendances aren't bigger. Most people who slate the standard, or the entertainment value of the league have absolutley nothing to base their prejudice upon. (And whatever about the first, I think they're way off about the second) My original point stands. It's clubs/teams we need to foster an allegiance to, not players, who will be here today gone tomorrow.

**DannyInvincible** · 28/08/2013, 10:53 AM

Originally Posted by ArdeeBhoy

Richie S suddenly gets 'famous'...

**TonyD** · 28/08/2013, 7:46 PM

Not exactly on topic, but I watched Man U/Chelsea the other night, and was I the only one bored stupid ? Dull as ditchwater I thought. Or maybe it's just the fact that I have no real interest in either team (always a good laugh to see Unireh lose though)

**oriel** · 29/08/2013, 12:20 PM

It was an awful game, watched it in slots of 15 mins, thinking it would spring to life, it never did.

But..................you will never hear anyone give out about it, if that was a LOI game, comments would be qued up 'I`m not watching that s##te'

**sadloserkid** · 29/08/2013, 2:09 PM

Originally Posted by oriel

It was an awful game, watched it in slots of 15 mins, thinking it would spring to life, it never did.

But..................you will never hear anyone give out about it, if that was a LOI game, comments would be qued up 'I`m not watching that s##te'

Agree completely, could have counted the moments of genuine quality on your fingers. All that said there were plenty of defenders of it on my facebook feed as well as a few critics, I was genuinely staggered by that.

**Charlie Darwin** · 29/08/2013, 2:27 PM

It was good in parts. United were a surprise in that they were utterly dominant but they didn't have the creative players to win the game. Chelsea were just atrocious - no ambition. I couldn't believe what I was hearing about Rooney having a great game.