I see the Limerick manager is having a go at the "technology": http://www.rte.ie/sport/gaa/hurling/...erick-players/
The technology works fine; you just have to make sure some eejit doesn't set it incorrectly first. Didn't the GAA admit it was a human setting error rather than a "Hawk-Eye error"?“My view is that Hawk-Eye, at this moment in time, has let the association down. It has let players down and it has let managers down. It has failed.”
Wallace acknowledged that the introduction of the score detection system had received overwhelming support at GAA Congress last year, but now questions the basis on which delegates were convinced of the merits of the technology.
“We are all aware of (the support) but what was (the Hawk-Eye technology) sold on? Was it sold on the basis that it was infallible, that it could not make a mistake? Well we are now dealing with the reality of its mistake. It did not award a point to the Limerick minors who should have won that game.”
“Not alone do we not have confidence in Hawk-Eye at this stage, but how could Davy Fitzgerald and Jimmy Barry Murphy have confidence in a system that has proved to be not as infallible as it was claimed to be.”
Anyway, as Bonnie also points out, the system is simply an aid which the referee can ignore or over-rule.
Bookmarks