I was correcting Danny's odd claim that "By and large, European territorial disputes have been resolved". And, as I explained, NI is dfferent to those places.Originally Posted by Bonnie Shels
I've answered you already. The Free State and later Republic chose not to revive a Border Commission because throughout they've been content not merely with a partition, but with the line drawn in the 1920s. Ostensibly, because they don't want to abandon Nationalists in a rump NI; in reality, because Governments and wider public opinion have been content with the situation. Put simply, their priority for decades has been not a united Ireland, but arguing a better deal for Nationalists within NI.Now I ask you, why were ther no alterations to the border? Have you got some knowledge of some other Border Commission plan?
Diddums, you big baby.Generally, I certainly criticise some aspects of Nationalism, as reasonably as I can offering evidence where appropriate; specifically, Dev was ridiculed as Eddie Coll throughout Ireland and during his lifetime, as it became clear that his claimed family background was baloney.Your constant sniping in and around various aspects of nationalism loses you any empathy towards what you may have initally stated. Your "Eddie Coll" statement par example
There are 'political structures' in place, ie regular elections to Stormont, Westminster and the rest. In poll after poll for decades they consistently fail to support a united Ireland.Irish Nationalists will never achieve their aims until there's a political structure in place for it to be achieved. As it stands the political structure in place is what we have and in order for it to take place it needs to be shown that there is a likelyhood of a border poll succeedin
Aye, they could start doing that. Do you accept that they haven't to date?The only thing that Nationalists can do right now is show how a United Ireland is in the best interests of every Irish person regardless of his or her political beliefs in the hope that if a poll was to take place it would succeed
You made a vague, generalised claim, were reasonably asked to detail and justify it, and couldn't/ wouldn't. Any awkwardness is your own.Again I think you are misreading what I am saying and are being deliberately awkward
Just repeating 'let's have a border poll' (which he's been doing for decades) isn't starting anything.In order for this debate to occur we have to start it somewhere. GA has done this
Embarrassment if they call the poll and it shows large-scale apathy/ hostility to a united Ireland. While FG, FF, Labour and co don't actually want a UI, equally they don't want to have to explain why not. Obvious solution: no poll.Embarrasment from a hypothetical referendum that may or may not need to happen?
It's a daydream. Politicians have always opposed it in private, knowing the implications; the wider electorate would in public once the immediate costs are clear to them.The aspiration of a united Ireland is a strong fact of life amongst the majority of people on this island
A united Ireland (which means taking over places like East Belfast and North Down with their less than 5% Nationalist electorates) is no more likely than you becoming the 17th Land of Germany.
Actually it shows what it says it does, a basic standard which for most of the last century has meant NI has been more affluent than the South.The talk of safety-nets shows the height of ambition...
If you choose to post rambling, borderline-racist theories (admittedly while clearly drunk, I realise not typical of you), you can hardly be surprised if they attract comment.If you choose to be literal, I can't help it
Bookmarks