Ignoring the poster and of course ALL the comments underneath:
Unionism would never stoop so low surely?
---
You have to admit regardless of the reasoning behind the call for the vote and change, the Unionust reaction is rather brilliant. Always measured and calculated. How in Gods name did they ever have the wherewithal to be "the People"?
DID YOU NOTICE A SIGN OUTSIDE MY HOUSE...?
Mopery alert Bonita.
OMOV has applied in all NI elections for decades.
Apart from the Europeans, of course. And the assembly. Other than that, you're one hundred and ten percent correct (adjusting the percentages for the obligatory historical gerrymander!)
Last edited by Eminence Grise; 24/07/2015 at 10:37 PM.
Hello, hello? What's going on? What's all this shouting, we'll have no trouble here!
- E Tattsyrup.
You said OMOV (one man one vote) applied in all NI elections - it doesn't. So, you were factually wrong.
And, yes, it was all couched in a gag - nothing gets past your eagle eyes!
Hello, hello? What's going on? What's all this shouting, we'll have no trouble here!
- E Tattsyrup.
Just think of me as your sub-editor.
NI elections featured plural voting (ie some people mainly business premise owners or university graduates had two or more) until the start of the Troubles in 1969. So 21 years after the practice was abandoned elsewhere in Britain.
So basically what everyone locally understands OMOV to mean.
I'd hate you to think that 'sub' was the first prefix anybody here would usually apply to you.
What part of the Assembly and European parliament elections using PR-STV are you mixing up with plurality/one man, one vote/first past the post? BTW, plural voting isn't plurality.
Hello, hello? What's going on? What's all this shouting, we'll have no trouble here!
- E Tattsyrup.
File under Ignore, EG.
Ah come on GR, surely as a loyal man who had the wherewithal to leave his island you can see just how idiotic it all is from the PUL leaders [sic].
DID YOU NOTICE A SIGN OUTSIDE MY HOUSE...?
Bookmarks