Last edited by killer"B"; 22/04/2013 at 2:24 PM.
Because that was his first league game and we were made aware of it before the next game and he signed then, its a disgrace and the AUL prove once again how ridiculous the whole lot of em are, if someone is doing well they tend not to like it. They will be sorry when everyone wants no more to do with them an players start leaving to play MSL and MJL
Donnie, are you saying that the AUL are vindictive? surely not! Had a few strange decisions from them over the years myself and sometimes you feel they make up the rules as they go along. Wasnt the problem with the Clonmel game that the player in question had his name on the card but he wasnt playing? A player that was signed within the 14 day rule played illegally under his name? Common knowledge but i agree it should have nothing to do with the League points. Thats a shocking decision imo.
Il give 1 incident on how different msl is to aul when castleview season in the msl finished I signed for Cobh (summer soccer) then signed back from Cobh when castlview started back after 4 games the msl asked castleview where s this players registration and they said we sent it in when he came back with the transfer form Cobh confirmed it had been signed!
Msl just said they never received it but used there heads and said no problom and just registered me again why didn't aul just do this instead of docking killumney points
Theirs only one problem with common sense and that's it's not common![]()
How have macroom jumped ahead of us when they havent played according to all results on website.?
AUL appear to have gone after a few teams 1for. Can't be accused on that front.
Bookmarks