Originally Posted by geysir
I would not disagree with your point about the wearing of the poppy being hijacked by right wing elements. But McClean himself has stirred things a bit with some very silly political comments and has now left himself open to such disgusting, disgraceful attacks. This guy will not be charged as there are too many like him out there and that unfortunately is reality. McClean should know by now that twitter creates a lot of problems for him, so why continue to use it?
When I mentioned McClean's position as being unique, I was referring to him being an English based Irish international from Derry who has refused to wear a poppy (I apologise for not being clearer).
I mentioned McClean should clarify his position last year and again this year, not to appease idiots, but so the general public and media have a better understanding of his motives. This tweet is one of many issues surrounding McClean and his refusal to wear the poppy. Last year he was booed for quite a number of weeks after not wearing a poppy, this year we had the issue of was he sent home by Wigan or not and now this crap. If anyone wants a fall guy around this time of the year, James is your man. Explaining his situation may not end all of this, but might at least take the spotlight off him at this time of year.
Last edited by gastric; 14/11/2013 at 8:45 AM.
Anybody with half a brain would understand why McClean doesn't wear one. Those without even half a brain still wouldn't understand (or care to understand) after an explanation. There's no need for a statement, it would only put him in the firing line further due to the publicity it would attract. He should be forced off twitter though, for his own protection, seeing as he's too thick to do it himself.
Last edited by DeLorean; 14/11/2013 at 3:08 PM.
I believe he's been back on Twitter since the day he left Sunderland.
Anyway, James doesn't have to explain or justify his choice not to wear a poppy (most certainly not a unique situation; the poppy is a very contentious symbol in Derry and throughout the north of the country for obvious reasons) to anyone, nor does his opting not to do so mean that the abuse he receives is remotely warranted. Even if he was in some unique situation, the abuse would still be inexcusable. The above message is at the very least verging on legally criminal. Neither can James be responsible for simpletons equating any decision of his not to wear a poppy with anti-Britishness.
Modern-day heroes...
Are you implying James is at fault? What comments are you referring to exactly and what has he said to warrant hate speech?
The lad probably gets a buzz out of it, to be honest, but that by no means excuses hate speech.McClean should know by now that twitter creates a lot of problems for him, so why continue to use it?
His motives are to be respected in a supposedly-free society, whether they remain private or are made public. Will the general public write him a letter of apology after their collective eureka moment or what? If uncouth idiots want to crudely simplify his stance down to a case of anti-Britishness, is it likely a public explanation will force them to drop their prejudicial agenda and amend their outlook? Those abusing him aren't necessarily abusing him because they misunderstand or lack insight. In fact, that former soldier knows full well why James would take issue with sporting a poppy and is, despicably, publicly baiting him and his community over it.When I mentioned McClean's position as being unique, I was referring to him being an English based Irish international from Derry who has refused to wear a poppy (I apologise for not being clearer).
I mentioned McClean should clarify his position last year and again this year, not to appease idiots, but so the general public and media have a better understanding of his motives. This tweet is one of many issues surrounding McClean and his refusal to wear the poppy. Last year he was booed for quite a number of weeks after not wearing a poppy, this year we had the issue of was he sent home by Wigan or not and now this crap. If anyone wants a fall guy around this time of the year, James is your man. Explaining his situation may not end all of this, but might at least take the spotlight off him at this time of year.
Last edited by DannyInvincible; 14/11/2013 at 9:16 AM.
Remember it is by and large 'uncouth idiots' (I like that one Danny) who are creating the fuss about James not wearing a poppy. I came across the following piece in an English paper last year (can't remember which one) that shows most English people are very reasonable about his subject and couldn't give a toss about the poppy.
''Now, McClean has not yet articulated the reason he chose not to wear a poppy (although the very idea that he should be forced to do so is itself laughable) however let’s suppose that he did, in that case the reason might include the words “Bloody Sunday Massacre”. McClean grew up on the Creggan estate in Derry from which came six of the 14 unarmed peaceful protestors killed by our heroic boys on that fateful day. I’d say McClean, an Irish Republican has at least six very good reasons why not to wear a poppy.
Is it really a “lack of respect” to refuse to honour an organisation which murdered innocent civilians on your doorstep before covering-up the exact circumstances of what happened, let alone acknowledging blame? “But,” the neo-Patriots say as the froth of indignation drips from their mouths “what about the 49,000 Irish soldiers who died fighting with the British in the First World War?” What about them? Those 49,000 soldiers died protecting freedom and personal choice. Should we trample across their graves simply so we can get the nod of approval from The Daily Mail and the meatheads on Twitter? Surely the best way of honouring the fallen is to preserve the freedom they fought and died to protect''
Why should the fact that he's from Derry make it easier to understand why he wouldn't wear a poppy? Would it be even more of an outrage if a Dublin born English-based footballer refused to wear it?
Folding my way into the big money!!!
Because he's from the same area as 6 of those killed by the British Army on Bloody Sunday, and the sentiment presumably runs a lot deeper there than it does in Dublin, where there hasn't been significant British military action since 1922.
Allegedly there was one in 1974 (ie the UVF are generally accepted to have been responsible, but suggestions of collusion persist).
Without wishing to add to the McClean debate nor downplay any atrocity, those were two incidents of thousands during the troubles. The sentiment generally runs deeper all over the place, in both parts of Ireland and beyond.
Yes. We, er, know.
It would seem I am out of step with everyone else on here in relation to James, but hopefully the controversy in relation to him wearing thepoppy will die down ove rhte next few years. At least we can all heopefully agree on that!
What Jon Snow dubbed "poppy fascism" has been steadily worsening year on year.
No longer take any notice of poppy-wearers. If they want to, fine.
But no longer feel the slightest empathy with this cause as it's been hijacked by morons and who use it as propaganda to, partially at least, try to con 'the masses' into following their misguided and unnecessary militaristic agenda.
Not quite as spectacular or in your face as these bad boys.............
Dignity brother......
I thought you were off the drink Ronnie?
"No, I drink to help me mind my own business....can I get you one? (c) Ronnie Drew
Hmm, a poppy tribute from a tribute club...
How quaint!
The poppy what patriotic, imperialistic nonsense. A leftover from a Victorian mentality. Why should any Irish person honour the people who died fighting in the British armed forces? To whitewash history to suggest they did it to preserve Irish people's, or even working class English people's freedom is a nonsense. For every Second World War there were a dozen wars that they specifically were used to prevent people from attaining their freedom. Offhand I can think of:
The first and second Boer Wars
The Anglo-Irish War
The 3 Anglo-Afghan wars
The 3 Anglo-Burmese wars
The Anglo-Zulu War
The 2 Opium Wars
The Anglo-Ashanti Wars
The Anglo-Egyptian Wars
The notion that they fought preserving people's freedom in World War I is also a fairly inaccurate portrayal of historical fact. A more pointless war you couldn't imagine it was simply a result of an unrestricted arms build up and the inevitable tension that resulted from the imperial powers of Europe trying to jostle for their positions of power in the world order. The British and French were no more interested in preserving people's freedom than the Austrians or the Germans. In fact I think from our point of view here In Ireland the Germans provided us with weapons to help us to fight the British for our freedom.
Where's the remembrance day for all those people who have selflessly devoted their lives to helping to improve the lot of people born in more unfortunate circumstances than themselves instead of us celebrating what are essentially trained killers?
I have to add I live in England so it only annoys me because I have to put up with the hypocrisy of it all year in and year out.
Last edited by youngirish; 17/11/2013 at 7:37 PM.
http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/socc...aper-1.1598019
Good man James.
Nothing new there. Only a matter of time before MO'N bars him from Twitter?
Though if people constantly have a dig, you can understand why he has a go back.
Expect the IFA to issue a statement soon,
a threat has been detected, a baseless attack on their vanguard, the BT.
When did altruism ever govern the foreign policy of Western powers?
I can't remember through all the drivel they've spouted over the past couple of years, but did the Belfast Telegraph actually refer to McClean as a "turncoat" or were they quoting some other bitter idiot?
Over on OWC, numerous osteriches are under the impression that the Belfast Telegraph is very much an anti-IFA/NI paper.
This article originally began with the phrase "Turncoat James McClean".
Posting Permissions
Quote
Bookmarks