Yes, I'm familiar with Co Adriaanse's CV. He has spent the last 10 years jumping between mid-east clubs to set himself up for his retirement. Now he has retired, but international football might be the gig he is looking for. And the FAI can afford him.
I've noticed a few articles lately saying that the next manager should attend underage games more often, and a caller mentioned it on Today FM earlier. Not sure why this is only coming up now, and why people are suddenly so insistent on it. As I posted elsewhere, Trapattoni did give out a large number of new caps, and promoted players from the U21's regularly, so I'm wondering why it's suddenly become an issue after he's left?
Originally Posted by geysir
Perhaps Bennocelt then, you guys all moan the same.
Please excuse the mix up.
Ha what! Moaning, thanks.
At least I dont have my head in the sand. Remember it was 1/3 tournaments good or bad for 8 million? Value for money? I dont think so.
Some people would celebrate any old rubbish (ole ole)
Yes, that really really sounds like the basis for an appointment.
Stan returning would make more sense.
Last edited by ArdeeBhoy; 21/09/2013 at 8:49 PM.
You're the voice of reason on here. Brine3 has some good points also.
And glad you mentioned Brady, who was one of the players in my original creative players that Trap had no time for argument.
Well Benno, you never do tire of repeating that rancid juvenile sarcasm.Ha what! Moaning, thanks.
At least I dont have my head in the sand. Remember it was 1/3 tournaments good or bad for 8 million? Value for money? I dont think so.
Some people would celebrate any old rubbish (ole ole)
Could we have got better than Trap? possibly yes and possibly we could have got worse, like your hero Beenhakker
At least we didn't have to cheer the rubbish Leo served up for the people of Poland, regardless of what he cost.
The Beenhakker Slump, a synonym of a dive to the bottom of European international football.
We don't have the players of Uruguay, Denmark and Croatia at the moment.
If we'd tried to play like Spain with the players we had at our disposal, we probably wouldn't have qualified for Euro 2012. Maybe it would have made you happy, but I prefer to have been there at the top table, even if ultimately, we were one of the worse teams who were good enough to qualify.There's no point in playing hoofball if the most it leads to is a first round exit. We may as well give it a proper lash as far as playing football is concerned.
I'm not deriding tippy-tappy football, it's very good when done right. We just don't have the players to play it like Spain can. And there's nothing wrong with ballet, just you shouldn't expect to get the same experience out of football.There is something seriously wrong with Irish football culture if passing the ball is derided as "tippy tappy" and compared unfavourably to ballet (what's wrong with ballet, by the way?).
How many players from 2002 are still playing for Ireland? 2? Maybe if we had Holland, Kinsella, Duff, Kilbane, McAteer, Keane and Kelly in their prime, we would be able to play a more passing game.That attitude is something that needs to be addressed at all levels. We can play football. We outdid Germany and Spain for possession at the 2002 World Cup. Trap has told us that we are no good and that we have no choice but to play hoofball and certain people are lapping it up.
That said, I think Trap should have played a more attractive style of play because it would have been more effective with the players we have now. You, on the other hand, seem to think that tiki-taka is the solution to any footballing problem, even if you have a team of technically-limited giants at your disposal. If nothing else because you think it's pretty, and you feel entitled to have the national side play in a style you personally enjoy.
So you agree with me that we should play passing football because our players would be more effective to play like that, but because you don't want to be seen to agree with me, you make up a straw man about me being a tiki-taka aficionado. I don't like Barca's tiki-taka, it bores the life out of me... and it's not entirely effective either, they need some proper centre-backs in that team. God knows why they didn't buy Kompany and Vertonghen before Man City and Spurs snapped them up.That said, I think Trap should have played a more attractive style of play because it would have been more effective with the players we have now. You, on the other hand, seem to think that tiki-taka is the solution to any footballing problem, even if you have a team of technically-limited giants at your disposal. If nothing else because you think it's pretty, and you feel entitled to have the national side play in a style you personally enjoy.
Passing the ball (I'm not referring to tiki-taka) is the most effective way to play football, you cold say the sport was designed to be played that way. Even the likes of New Zealand and Trinidad and Tobago managed to acquit themselves quite well playing a passing game at the World Cup, and they have players that are far, far inferior to ours.
Hoofball is the enemy of football. It's the quickest way to lose possession and put yourself straight back under pressure again. No international team ever won a major tournament playing it, and there's a reason for that. It doesn't work. Even Greece 2004 knew the basics of possession football - they didn't need to resort to hoofball. They were negative, defensive and disciplined, but they weren't hoofing it. Same with the great defensive Italian teams, I have a lot of time for them too.
Would you say Jack Charlton's teams played 'hoofball'?
And incidentally which international side currently plays your 'ideal' football...
He got 1/2 for Poland, first time they got to a Euros, also got Tnt to a world cup. Granted he might not be doing a whole lot at the moment.Well Benno, you never do tire of repeating that rancid juvenile sarcasm.
Could we have got better than Trap? possibly yes and possibly we could have got worse, like your hero Beenhakker
At least we didn't have to cheer the rubbish Leo served up for the people of Poland, regardless of what he cost.
The Beenhakker Slump, a synonym of a dive to the bottom of European international football.
Why then are you not sticking up for Trap to continue? At least I have not changed my position from day one, but you have, funny that!
yes, he did but he often chose strange players and at strange times, so mere numbers don't present the full picture. I'm sure there was a line of communication between King and Trap, but it's simply a part of the senior manager's responsibility to be aware of all the available talent and also to inspire and encourage the underage managers.
When the facts change I change my mind. What do you do sir?
That quote is often attributable to John Maynard Keynes, though some say it was Churchill.
The reality is that Trap's methods were effective at first but when it became obvious the methods were not working then it was time to reassess. I supported Trap in campaign 1, tended to think on balance he was doing well in campaign 2, despite serious concerns, and then thought he was awful in campaign 3. I suspect Geysir and many others were similar.
Yes, Charlton's teams were under instruction to hoof the ball up the pitch. It's possible we may have done slightly better had we been a bit more constructive.
I don't have an "ideal" type of football. You can play passing football in a number of different formations with a number of different styles (defensive, attacking, etc.). It depends on the players and opposition.
Hmm, so the real answer is, you "don't know". Which is what I suspected all along...
Yes, credit to Trap for cleaning up Stan's mess in the 2010 qualifiers. In the 2012 qualifiers the team player poorer than the 2010 qualifiers, but scraped through nonetheless. It was clear we were going to be destroyed in Poland unless we sorted out a few issues that Trap ignored. He continued to ignore them in Poland and right up to last week in Austria. He's a one trick trap a pony, and his one trick was found out long ago.
Stop being abrasive. I said it depends on the opposition. If you are playing the Faroe Islands you might play a more attacking passing football, if you are playing a top team then you might play a more defensive form of possession football, e.g. like Greece did in 2004.
But if you want to lose possession as quickly as possible and put your own team under pressure as quickly as possible, then hoofing it up the pitch is the way to go.
It's not abrasive. You're bleating on about our 'style' and have come up with the name of one washed-up Dutch coach who seems virtually retired and hardly any more 'in touch' than Trap...
Need to be realistic, not a whole lot of idealistic nonsense, which is what this sounds like. Sorry!
You have nothing to contribute yourself except to have a go at me all the time.
No, am just pointing out the flaws in your 'argument'.
That's all.
Isn't that the whole point of a MB?
But sure its handy to say that, but the facts are his system hasnt changed throughout all these campaigns.
So when he was doing "well" he was great, not so great when not qualifying. I get ya,lol
Last edited by bennocelt; 22/09/2013 at 9:13 AM.
Posting Permissions
Quote
Bookmarks