Well at least remove your insinuation, gibberish so thanks.
I'll address one before we start to move, while I understand he was reluctant to name names (if he had them), he shouldn't have brought this element into the situation (in the same way as he does in his articles) because he was stirring the pot. You may see this as bizarre, okay. I don't know what you mean about the articles - if you read them you'll see a common thread in how he addressed this matter, again, I restate that this is stirring, and not fully truthful (truth=disclosure, a pov). To repeat the exact lines he used on the radio I'll have to listen to it so as to sate you, I won't begin to quote him without 100% accuracy.
Bookmarks