Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 145

Thread: All-Ireland representative team survey

  1. #101
    First Team Sullivinho's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2010
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    1,755
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    436
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    730
    Thanked in
    366 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by The Fly View Post
    Good post Sullivinho.

    It's eloquent use of imagery successfully conveyed the central pertinent points; I especially enjoyed the poached salmon reference, and the iceberg metaphor.

    I was tempted to deduct a mark for the mispelling of 'honour', but.......I let that pass.

    10/10.
    Swing 'n a miss on 'supersede' too but I'm calling in with mondayitis. Which, continuing the theme, is also not a word.

  2. #102
    Seasoned Pro Fixer82's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ceatharlach
    Posts
    3,220
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,262
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    890
    Thanked in
    610 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sullivinho View Post
    Discomfort, Really? Personally, I see the fact that Gibson and co. don't have to dilute their nationality and settle for the representative XI of the gerrymandered jurisdiction they were born in as a cause for celebration. It makes me a little uncomfortable to see 'the likes' of Niall McGinn applying the panacea of a bowed head when required to observe an ode to his own misrepresentation when that iceberg dirges forth, Union Jack flying proudly from it's tip.

    The suggestion that jurisdiction supercedes politics is the kind of convenience that sees the individual motivations of the players disregarded in many of the pieces written on the issue, clearing a path for words such as 'poached'. Whenever their motives are given print or recognition, words such as 'honor' and 'country' come to the fore rather than the jurisdictionally-compliant blubs of freshly abducted salmon.
    Great post.
    Are you Con Houlihan in disguise?
    Folding my way into the big money!!!

  3. #103
    Capped Player
    Joined
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,925
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,880
    Thanked in
    2,796 Posts
    I see the IFA (and SFA and the FAW) don't want to be part of a GB team in the Olympics. Jim Boyce says he'll discourage NI players from playing.

    It reminds me a bit of Ian Paisley during the foot & mouth crisis. "Ulster beef is Irish, not British!"

  4. Thanks From:


  5. #104
    Reserves Fizzer's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    278
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    33
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    111
    Thanked in
    65 Posts
    1. So bored by the constant hijacking of a football site with barely-disguised sectarian bile, tired of skipping through the infantile novellas that pose as posts, that I really couldn't give a sh1te.
    2. Ditto
    3. Ditto
    4. Ditto

    I'll leave yis to it
    Le monde est a nous

  6. #105
    First Team Sullivinho's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2010
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    1,755
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    436
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    730
    Thanked in
    366 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuttgart88 View Post
    I see the IFA (and SFA and the FAW) don't want to be part of a GB team in the Olympics. Jim Boyce says he'll discourage NI players from playing.

    It reminds me a bit of Ian Paisley during the foot & mouth crisis. "Ulster beef is Irish, not British!"
    Strange one that. They'd have saved a fortune on flags. Her majesty won't be best pleased that some of her horses are refusing to run.

  7. #106
    International Prospect CraftyToePoke's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,849
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,323
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,503
    Thanked in
    979 Posts
    It is a strange one alright, the other three associations seem to be saying they had no part in the discussions and no intention of combining, whereas the London FA are saying something about an historic agreement having been reached to facilitate this. You couldnt make it up.

    The poor old IFA, they will have to employ some extra people purely to say 'NO', between the AI and GB lobby's attempts to assimilate them.

  8. #107
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fizzer View Post
    1. So bored by the constant hijacking of a football site with barely-disguised sectarian bile, tired of skipping through the infantile novellas that pose as posts, that I really couldn't give a sh1te.
    2. Ditto
    3. Ditto
    4. Ditto

    I'll leave yis to it
    Who on here is 'sectarian' ?? Do you even know what the word means?

    (Ok, know of one person from the other side who is on occasion, but the rest are anything but....)
    Last edited by ArdeeBhoy; 22/06/2011 at 10:55 PM.

  9. #108
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuttgart88 View Post
    I see the IFA (and SFA and the FAW) don't want to be part of a GB team in the Olympics. Jim Boyce says he'll discourage NI players from playing.

    It reminds me a bit of Ian Paisley during the foot & mouth crisis. "Ulster beef is Irish, not British!"
    Sure, knowing them, they want their cake and more....

  10. #109
    First Team Gather round's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2006
    Location
    West Midlands, England
    Posts
    2,045
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    106
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    221
    Thanked in
    170 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CraftyToePoke View Post
    It is a strange one alright, the other three associations seem to be saying they had no part in the discussions and no intention of combining, whereas the London FA are saying something about an historic agreement having been reached to facilitate this. You couldnt make it up
    You just have (OK, the English FA has). It's a dumb stunt by the BOA and EFA because ticket sales have been surprisingly low (compared with kayaking, badminton, tiddlywinks selling out).

  11. #110
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    It's got nothing to do with the BOA/FA, just the usual paranoia.
    They should grow some balls and strike out on their own if they really "don't want" to be British....

  12. #111
    International Prospect CraftyToePoke's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,849
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,323
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,503
    Thanked in
    979 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Gather round View Post
    You just have (OK, the English FA has). It's a dumb stunt by the BOA and EFA because ticket sales have been surprisingly low (compared with kayaking, badminton, tiddlywinks selling out).
    The BBC line on it, I read about it in todays i-paper but cant find a link to that article http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/olym...2/13873251.stm

    This is now drifting off topic but it seems very counterproductive of the EFA to impose this or to carry on without the support of the relevant other associations surely? Where is the good in that. Or indeed if a GB side made up of English players only is where this will settle.

  13. #112
    First Team Gather round's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2006
    Location
    West Midlands, England
    Posts
    2,045
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    106
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    221
    Thanked in
    170 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CraftyToePoke View Post
    This is now drifting off topic but it seems very counterproductive of the EFA to impose this or to carry on without the support of the relevant other associations surely? Where is the good in that. Or indeed if a GB side made up of English players only is where this will settle
    They aren't really imposing anything, just being msleading to the point of dishonesty about their supposed 'historic agreement' with the other FAs. All of whom have said that they want nothing to do with the idea, while having to acknowledge that the British side can pick any NI, Scotland or Wales players that they fancy and who agree.

    I'm guessing it will be just English in the end- the non-English players will back off facing hostility from the fans.

    There'll be no legal action from either the other FAs nor disgruntled players. The law ignores trivia. They wouldn't have a case.

  14. #113
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    Do we really care, though?

    Let them fester in their own colonial BS.

  15. #114
    Seasoned Pro Fixer82's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ceatharlach
    Posts
    3,220
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,262
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    890
    Thanked in
    610 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fizzer View Post
    1. So bored by the constant hijacking of a football site with barely-disguised sectarian bile, tired of skipping through the infantile novellas that pose as posts, that I really couldn't give a sh1te.
    2. Ditto
    3. Ditto
    4. Ditto


    I'll leave yis to it
    Hmmmm, don't see how calling for an all-inclusive All-Ireland team could be seen as sectarian
    Folding my way into the big money!!!

  16. Thanks From:


  17. #115
    First Team Not Brazil's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,414
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    244
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    207
    Thanked in
    131 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fixer82 View Post
    Hmmmm, don't see how calling for an all-inclusive All-Ireland team could be seen as sectarian
    It could, however, be seen as a call for a denial of choice.
    The Englishmen came over in the year 2005
    But little did they know that we'd planned a wee surprise
    Sir David scored the winner, and Windsor Park went wild
    And this is what we sang...

  18. #116
    Seasoned Pro Fixer82's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ceatharlach
    Posts
    3,220
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,262
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    890
    Thanked in
    610 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Not Brazil View Post
    It could, however, be seen as a call for a denial of choice.
    You're not gonna draw me into this one.

    Re a British Olympic soccer team...they have a British everything else in the Olympics so can't see how they could have just an English or Scottish soccer team. Surely it would HAVE to be Great Britain if they put out a soccer team. And that could include NI players unless those players opt for Ireland a la Wayne McCullough in 1992
    Folding my way into the big money!!!

  19. #117
    First Team Not Brazil's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,414
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    244
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    207
    Thanked in
    131 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fixer82 View Post
    Re a British Olympic soccer team...they have a British everything else in the Olympics so can't see how they could have just an English or Scottish soccer team. Surely it would HAVE to be Great Britain if they put out a soccer team.
    The Olympic football team will be called "GB".

    In practice, it will be dominated by English players - Bale from Wales is interested in playing.
    The Englishmen came over in the year 2005
    But little did they know that we'd planned a wee surprise
    Sir David scored the winner, and Windsor Park went wild
    And this is what we sang...

  20. #118
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Not Brazil View Post
    It could, however, be seen as a call for a denial of choice.
    Would that be the same 'denial of choice' inflicted upon Ireland and numerous other countries over time?

  21. #119
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fixer82 View Post
    You're not gonna draw me into this one.

    Re a British Olympic soccer team...they have a British everything else in the Olympics so can't see how they could have just an English or Scottish soccer team. Surely it would HAVE to be Great Britain if they put out a soccer team. And that could include NI players unless those players opt for Ireland a la Wayne McCullough in 1992
    Worthington today has come out and said his "players are free to play for the British Olympic team".
    There is however, one small problem with that scenario....

  22. #120
    First Team Not Brazil's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,414
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    244
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    207
    Thanked in
    131 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ArdeeBhoy View Post
    Would that be the same 'denial of choice' inflicted upon Ireland and numerous other countries over time?
    The people of Ireland expressed their choice in 1998.

    I'm talking about football - you know, the right of players born in Northern Ireland to have a choice.
    The Englishmen came over in the year 2005
    But little did they know that we'd planned a wee surprise
    Sir David scored the winner, and Windsor Park went wild
    And this is what we sang...

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. League of Ireland Representative Teams
    By Dodge in forum Premier & First Divisions
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05/02/2024, 12:08 AM
  2. Survey to the League of Ireland
    By robertob in forum Premier & First Divisions
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08/10/2008, 10:21 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •