Compiled evidence by UEFA observers and police reports, prove otherwise.
When is comes to hooliganism as we know it, as in street riots, stadium clashes, 'kerrufles', sectarion song, Rangers have that area cornered. The Rangers's brand of hooliganism doesn't travel well. Whatever Celtic fans get up to in bigoted Scotland, at least they behave themselves when they travel.
All that is peripheral as to why Lennon has become the focus of extreme hate and bigotry right from the time he signed for Celtic.
A trail of hate has followed Lennon around football grounds in Scotland and NI since he signed for Celtic, and not far behind this trail of hate are the predictable claims that somehow Lennon has brought it all on. That somehow his behaviour is responsible, just like the time he tried to smash Shearer's boot in with his head.
MON knew what Lennon was about and the peculiar brand of hate that was directed at him and made a point, time and time again of standing side by side with Lennon.
Why would I? A wee bit of a slur there?
(Why would any rational person want to be grateful for those d*ckheads? Whoever they are.)
Or just uninformed, which surprises me.
As you've made pro-Celtic noises in the past?
Currently, that's beyond dispute.So DannyInvincible, what you are saying is that while both are bad, it's just that Rangers are worse. Fair enough.
Though I accept the facts that a minority of Celtic 'ned-types' are starting to react on the same level to the actions of the R*ngers substantial xenophobic constituency.
How anyone could deny the latter, is beyond belief!!!
Which does make me feel sorry for their decent fans, one of whom I was out with just last week.
A BBC Scotland documentary called 'Bigotry, Bombs and Football' focusing on "a season marred by parcel bombs and sectarian chanting': http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode..._and_Football/
It's on BBC iPlayer though so only available to UK viewers, unfortunately.
Bookmarks