Not quite so shockingly emotively neat as you interpret and there is plenty of ground for my reply.
I did not write two side of the same coin, as in you claimed Danny was the same as bigot and a redneck, but I said you claimed Danny had the opposite reaction, on the other side of the outraged bigot, the us and them scenario, which you imply, the us (Danny) and the them (outraged loyalist), are equally to be an issue.
And that snip was what you regarded as the most pertinent point from Danny's missive.
This is what you wrote. Fair enough if it is not what you intended, but it's just a familiar refrain.
"From your perspective, he's one of 'us' doing something which pissed 'them' off, and you're pleasantly surprised and happy to play it down, just as they are outraged and happy to play it up."
Bookmarks