Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 128 of 392 FirstFirst ... 2878118126127128129130138178228 ... LastLast
Results 2,541 to 2,560 of 7823

Thread: Eligibility Rules, Okay

  1. #2541
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by joe_denilson View Post
    Why I'm assuming he's used up his request, is because the rules say you are only allowed one 'request', not one 'change of association'.
    Wouldn't Zamora, Kane or O'Connor have had to make such a request twice though if they indeed made two switches each?

  2. #2542
    Closed Account
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3,443
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    266
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,166
    Thanked in
    646 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DannyInvincible View Post
    Wouldn't Zamora, Kane or O'Connor have had to make such a request twice though if they indeed made two switches each?
    All conjecture obviously, but my reading into it is this. The ruling was brought in for players who've been tied to a nation by playing competitively at underage.
    So requesting a 'change of association' would simply redeem your dual nationality.
    Kearns was born eligible for Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, but played competitively for NI, thus tieing him to them. When he requested a 'change of association' it simply brought back his dual nationality.
    When he subsequently played for ROI, the 'change of association' came into effect and he was tied to ROI.

    Similiarly, Zamora was tied to England, requested a change of association, got his dual nationality back, but then played for England again and is tied again, but this time for good as he has no requests left. But again, all conjecture.

    Tony Kane, never played competitively for ROI U21's so never got tied, and O'Connor never even joined an U21 squad.
    Last edited by Closed Account; 24/01/2012 at 3:43 PM.

  3. #2543
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    I mentioned the fact Zamora had played competitively for England at under-21 level to Ó Raghallaigh but he said "the FAI and other source was adamant that it's a once only call".

    Just reading around Zamora's apparent switch to Trinidad & Tobago, it appears that Jlloyd Samuel attempted to switch to Trinidad & Tobago from England at the exact same time: http://www.ttgapers.com/News/2009/8/...dad-passports/

    English Premier League footballers, Bobby Zamora of Fulham and J’Lloyd Samuel of Bolton Wanderers, have secured Trinidad and Tobago passports, making it highly likely that both will be selected for the Soca Warriors in their important World Cup Qualifying game against El Salvador next week.

    As of yesterday, both players are now officially Trinidad and Tobago citizens, and also recognized by FIFA to represent the twin island republic in the seemingly stalled World Cup 2010 campaign. It is expected that Soca Warriors head coach Russel Latapy will certainly call up the England-based duo for their first caps for Trinidad and Tobago.

    Soca Warriors manager David Muhammad has confirmed that both players will join the team on Monday with other foreign-based professionals. The 18 man squad is also expected to be named on Monday.
    However, whilst Zamora pulled out of that squad and attributed this to an injury, Samuel similarly failed to make the El Salvador fixture, but not due to injury. This piece claims he had failed to meet FIFA's registration deadline and so wasn't yet eligible: http://www.bwfc24.co.uk/2009/08/11/j...inidad-tobago/

    Bolton Wanderers defender Jlloyd Samuel will have to miss out on playing for his country, Trinidad and Tobago as he missed the registration deadline. Trinidad and Tobago currently lie at the bottom of the World Cup CONCACAF qualifying group having gained just 2 points in 5 games.

    Samuel was due to join the Soca Warriors when they play El Salvador tomorrow (August 12) at the Hasley Crawford Stadium in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago’s capital Pot of Spain.
    Is it possible then that Zamora had also failed to meet the same registration deadline meaning no switch ever went through as his documentation was never actually processed by FIFA?

  4. #2544
    Closed Account
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3,443
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    266
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,166
    Thanked in
    646 Posts
    Yourself and O'Raghallaigh have thrown the cat amongst the pidgeons again Danny. If the Zamora case is possible because he never completed the forms, then their are ways to explain all the others with other loopholes.

    So I've reverted back to Tony Kane.
    Here's what we know.
    Tony Kane had played U-18 and U-19 for Northern Ireland but I can't find out if they were competitive.
    But he was in their U19 Elite Qualifying Squad in 2006

    Tony Kane made his first appearance for ROI U-21s on 18/10/06
    Which Don Givens said this about:
    Givens said that all the paperwork had been completed and verified with FIFA regarding his change of association, including Kane's formal written request to represent Ireland.
    The fact that he needed to change association would deem his NI caps competitive.

    The Statutes as of Sep 2006 were:
    Up to his 21st birthday, a player may only once request changing the Association for which he is eligible to play international matches.

    Any Player who wishes to exercise this right to change Associations shall submit a written and substantiated request to the FIFA general secretariat. After submitting the request, the Player is no longer qualified to play for his current Association’s team.
    Then we had this from Ealing Green 10 days before TK played for NI U-21's
    UEFA ASK FAI TO SHUN THEIR FRIENDS IN THE NORTH

    Article in today’s Sunday Times states that UEFA asked FAI to omit players until the dispute was sorted out. Claims that this was why Tony Kane was left out of U21s by Don Givens and subsequently opted for NI.

    The article goes on
    "A spokesman for FIFA said on Friday:

    "The FIFA legal committee reviewed the question of eligibility of players from the Republic of Ireland to play for Northern Ireland and vice versa during its meeting in mid-August. Following that meeting FIFA requested the FAI and IFA to provide their position on the matter and is currently in consultations with both member associations. At this stage we cannot speculate when a final decision will be taken"
    The Statutes as of 17/10/06 when TK made his debut for NI U21, had changed to:
    If a Player has more than one nationality, he may, up to his 21st birthday, request to change the Association for which he is eligible to play international matches to the Association of another country of which he holds nationality.

    Once the player has filed his request, he is not eligible to play for any Association team until his request has been processed.
    So there is quiet clearly a rule change between the time Kane changed association to the FAI and then played for NI again.

    I'll try to track down, when exactly the change was made and if any circulars went out explaining it at the time.

    But judging by all that, my reading of it, is that there was a time that a request for a change of association ruled you out for your old association, but that rule appears to have changed, or at least the wording of it, between 06 and 07. But they'd crucially also taken out the 'only once' part of it. Maybe that's the loophole that allowed Zamora, Kane make the changes?
    Last edited by Closed Account; 25/01/2012 at 12:35 PM.

  5. Thanks From:


  6. #2545
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    Good research, although would that change in wording have changed the effect of the rule. I'm not sure it would have or could have. By my reading, the latter text would still limit a player to just one switch to "the Association of another country" (rather than "the Associations of other countries"), in spite of the removal of the "only once" phrase. A player cannot be "administratively" eligible (for want of a better description) to play for two associations at once if already registered with one, so if, as Givens said, Kane was registered with the FAI after having filed a request for change of association, he'd have no longer been eligible to play for the IFA and would presumably have had to file another request to revert back. Or is that too much to assume?

    A change in text surely wouldn't retrospectively cancel out any previous switches made by players either. I think the above appears to support geysir's view on matters.

  7. #2546
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    Just reading through that article from the latter regulations again and it indeed mentions "a player may exercise this right only once" in article 15.3(b).

  8. #2547
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    Anyone wanna have a stab at explaining how goalkeeper Danilo Clementino has been eligible to play for Equatorial Guinea since 2006? He's Brazilian-born and appears to be a naturalised citizen of Equatorial Guinea. He doesn't seem to have resided there for even a year, however, never mind five (he played his club football in Brazil prior to 2006), nor is there any suggestion that his parents/grandparents are from Equatorial Guinea. In spite of FIFA having tightened their eligibility criteria in 2004 after Qatar and Togo naturalised Brazilian citizens in similar fashion, his eligibility to play for Equatorial Guinea appears to have been approved two years later.

    The Equatoguinean national team happens to be littered with such players, mostly Spanish-born.

  9. #2548
    Reserves
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    506
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    327
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    181
    Thanked in
    107 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DannyInvincible View Post
    Anyone wanna have a stab at explaining how goalkeeper Danilo Clementino has been eligible to play for Equatorial Guinea since 2006? He's Brazilian-born and appears to be a naturalised citizen of Equatorial Guinea. He doesn't seem to have resided there for even a year, however, never mind five (he played his club football in Brazil prior to 2006), nor is there any suggestion that his parents/grandparents are from Equatorial Guinea. In spite of FIFA having tightened their eligibility criteria in 2004 after Qatar and Togo naturalised Brazilian citizens in similar fashion, his eligibility to play for Equatorial Guinea appears to have been approved two years later.

    The Equatoguinean national team happens to be littered with such players, mostly Spanish-born.
    Equatorial Guinea was a Spanish colony so I think these Spanish-born players are of Equatoguinean descent probably, but that goalkeeper case looks very suspect seeing as he has continuously played in Brazil so I have no idea how his eligibility was met. Maybe it's a case of the paperwork being filed before the rules were changed or something. What a joke these players are who play for countries that they have no links to.

    Edit - Maybe he is of Equatoguinean descent seeing as they describe the Spainish-born players of Equatoguinean descent as being naturalized as well. Although the Brazilian goalie was brought through under that Brazilian coach who was naturalizing players for Togo and then Equatorial Guinea. Who knows.
    Last edited by Irwin3; 25/01/2012 at 11:02 PM.

  10. #2549
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    Surely it's obvious?

    Deep down FIFA don't care...

  11. #2550
    Seasoned Pro ifk101's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2003
    Posts
    3,894
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    134
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    599
    Thanked in
    386 Posts
    Bribery within FIFA is unheard of so we so can rule that out before anyone suggests it ......

  12. #2551
    First Team Predator's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,633
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    768
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    362
    Thanked in
    228 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DannyInvincible View Post
    I suspect the same. Barry Maguire represented us at under-16 level before going on to represent Holland at under-age level. In spite of this, he's still eligible to play for us as the under-16 game for us would not have been considered an official/competitive fixture. That's not to say I'm sure as to whether or not the games he played for Holland were deemed competitive either. Anyhow, Zahavi's international career to date appears to prove this. He's been able to line out for Israel and the US whilst being officially tied to Portugal.

    Weren't there also two England-born players with Irish-sounding names who represented us at under-age level before it later transpired they weren't even eligible to play for us? Names escape me at the minute.
    The English born lads were James Wallace and Gerard Kinsella, who both played with Everton. Wallace, who scored for our u16s in a game against the Czech Rep. went on to represent England while Kinsella seems to have fallen into obscurity. I'm not sure how far out they are in terms of meeting criteria, but I am almost sure that they do not meet the criteria. Either that or they did and were keen to get some international bonuses .

    http://www.fai.ie/index.php?option=c...rticle&id=1964
    End Apartheid Now! One Team in Ireland!

  13. #2552
    Reserves SolitudeRed's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Belfast/Galway
    Posts
    372
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    31
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    26
    Thanked in
    18 Posts
    Another article on the eligibility issue this time by Ewan McKenna seems to have incurred the wrath of the OWB loyal...

    http://eircomsports.eircom.net/News/...rk-lights.aspx

    It was in March 2003 that John Dallat, the SDLP MLA for East Derry, brought up the issue of ‘God Save the Queen’ before Northern Ireland soccer matches. He said that the song was being exploited by bigots and that it was a deterrent for members of the Catholic community that wished to attend games. In two months’ time, it will be nine years since he raised an obvious and pressing issue, a timeframe in which nothing has changed regarding a song those involved in Northern Irish soccer believe is representative of their territory and people. Yet, it is against this background, that new manager Michael O’Neill has expressed his frustration and unhappiness about players declaring for the Republic.
    “I have never hidden behind the fact that I think it is wrong,” O’Neill said at his first official press conference, only a minute later to dodge a question that is very much entwined with his grievance. “The situation around the anthem is not something I have given any consideration to,” he added. “That’s a decision for other people; my focus is on building a competitive and fully inclusive international team.” But there, in just a few words, he managed to talk out of both sides of his mouth simultaneously.

    Being from Portadown, of course O’Neill understands the exclusion that exists in Northern Ireland soccer circles and exactly why some decent players, that he would have chosen, aren’t available to him. And of course he was always going to play the political game so early into his new job. But therein lies the rub. It’s about time the Irish Football Association and everyone connected with them stopped trying to play that political game and tried to develop something for all, and not just the some who choose to sing the British national anthem with interjections of ‘No Surrender’ in front of a Union Jack.

    It has been James McClean’s form with Sunderland that has started this latest debate, as the winger from Derry played under-21 with Northern Ireland but more recently switched allegiances. But who could possibly blame him? Of course his move was about more than just a song but anyone who thinks it was to do with playing with a better team clearly hasn’t experienced life in nationalist estates. Instead his move was helped along because of an unwillingness to adapt and incorporate in Northern Irish soccer. Indeed if anything summed up that rigid stance, it was this misfiring paragraph printed in the Belfast Telegraph.

    “The campaign has made Windsor Park – in spite of its name, the history of Linfield as a Protestant-dominated club, the playing of God Save The Queen at internationals and the flag-bedecked Village area – a less-unwelcoming place for Catholics.” And there you have it. For all that the IFA have tried to do in terms of supporters’ associations and rhetoric, they are unwilling to move on the major issues. Instead, they’ve laid down new carpet without bothering to fix the leak in the roof.

    Already, nationalists consider themselves to be Irish, not British, and the fact there are two teams on the island is, in terms of basic facts, because of a British presence here. So ask anyone on the Derry estates – where McClean and another Republic recruit Darron Gibson grew up – where they come from and it will become obvious why they have chosen the Republic of Ireland. Remember, these are players who grew up in a different era. Whatever about life away from sport, any nationalist kid who went to Windsor Park in the 1980s or ’90s will have decided there and then where their future’s lay courtesy of UDA flags, ‘The Billy Boys’ and even a refusal on one visit of the Republic of Ireland to play ‘Amhrann na bhFiann’ because it might upset the locals.

    But how much have things changed? Of course there have been improvements and campaigns run by the IFA but just last year a game between supporters of the Republic and the North had to be called off because of security fears surrounded the latter group. A leaked email from a Police Service of Northern Ireland officer spoke of the “unfortunate anti-social/sectarian behaviour of a number of our fans at the Scotland game” which had taken place in Dublin last February. But actual incidents aside, there is a mindset amongst many in Northern Irish soccer that is equally troubling and stagnant.

    Few seem to see that it is progressive that on an island of duel citizenship, players from Northern Ireland now have a choice. (And remember, this would have worked both ways only for the IFA to turn down an FAI proposal because they saw it purely as a numbers game rather than an acceptance of background and culture.) That members of the IFA want compensation for those who move shows up their draconian side. But nether cent nor penny seems to have dropped because not all that long ago a representative of the Northern Irish supporters’ association went on Ulster radio and talked about players who declare for "the other country" and when called up on his remarks refused to alter his wording.

    Some may talk of bigotry in the GAA as a defence but that is a cultural organisation that has never claimed to represent both sides of a community, in the same way that Ulster-Scots events aren’t meant for all. And some may talk about the fact that the likes of McClean played underage with the North but ignore the fact that kids don’t always have a choice, travel is an issue, being recognised by a separate association is very difficult as a youth and there isn’t that same atmosphere of anger and unease at underage games as there is when Windsor Park internationals are in full swing.

    All in all, anyone in Northern Irish soccer who has a problem with players declaring for the Republic are making the same mistake as those that have gone before and making sure that another generation of nationalist children will do just the same and make the switch. If those running Northern Irish soccer can’t see why it’s happening, then they are blind to the problem of exclusion that has been created. And therefore, they can never properly address it and the cycle will happen all over again.

  14. #2553
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    Hmm, seems a fair summary to me...

  15. #2554
    First Team Sullivinho's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2010
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    1,755
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    436
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    730
    Thanked in
    366 Posts
    IFA have serious fight on their hands to keep young stars.

    So in a long way around I ask myself how do the born and bred Irishmen feel about the likes of McLean, Duffy and Kearns making their way into the Irish senior ranks. If I was indeed in their shoes I would be incredibly annoyed and frustrated.

  16. Thanks From:


  17. #2555
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    Heh, yer man obviously doesn't know how a sizeable proportion of the North's population feel about their national identity...

    Or noticed the existence of the GFA, CAS ruling et al.

  18. Thanks From:


  19. #2556
    First Team Predator's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,633
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    768
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    362
    Thanked in
    228 Posts
    Your man Sam Gamble is a raving luny, if his tweets are anything to go by.
    End Apartheid Now! One Team in Ireland!

  20. #2557
    Banned. Children Banned. Grandchildren Banned. 3 Months. Charlie Darwin's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,577
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,890
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,310
    Thanked in
    3,368 Posts
    As a qualified journalist following four years studying Journalism at the University of Stirling
    How on earth he earned a degree with ****-poor constructions like this I'll never know.

  21. Thanks From:


  22. #2558
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    I've frequently dissected pieces on the eligibility issue point-by-point here, but that one's already a train-wreck.

  23. #2559
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    Lifted this from OWC:

    According to the the Sunday Times today Michael O'Neill phoned Martin ONeill to ask him to have a word with McClean. Martin did so but McClean refused to change his mind.

    Quote from Martin O'Neill:

    "I spoke to James and he had made up his mind about it. That really would be the end of it......Players have that choice now. I'm not sure on what grounds. They used to say that Jack Charlton picked up players because they had a pint in Dublin but it is a personal choice"

    He goes on to say he thinks McClean will have difficuly getting into the RoI side but he is not in a position to be able to dissuade the turd from defecting.
    I also tackled Sam Gamble about his piece in Twitter. He wasn't keen on a debate, resorted to insults and blocked me.

  24. #2560
    Coach BonnieShels's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wilkin's Ridge, Blackpool
    Posts
    12,087
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,431
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,662
    Thanked in
    1,825 Posts
    Ah yes... a turd... better than that douche Sammy Clingan...
    DID YOU NOTICE A SIGN OUTSIDE MY HOUSE...?

Similar Threads

  1. Eligibility Rules, Okay
    By TheOneWhoKnocks in forum Rubbish
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03/02/2017, 11:17 AM
  2. Eligibility Rules, Okay
    By geysir in forum Rubbish
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12/11/2013, 9:47 AM
  3. Problem - eligibility
    By SkStu in forum Support
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 25/05/2011, 8:14 AM
  4. Eligibility proposal
    By paul_oshea in forum Ireland
    Replies: 1111
    Last Post: 02/01/2008, 8:20 AM
  5. Eligibility Rules
    By Stuttgart88 in forum Ireland
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10/11/2004, 5:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •