Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 289 of 392 FirstFirst ... 189239279287288289290291299339389 ... LastLast
Results 5,761 to 5,780 of 7823

Thread: Eligibility Rules, Okay

  1. #5761
    Capped Player
    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,333
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,737
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,827
    Thanked in
    1,928 Posts
    I'd give him the women in shorts one, if it came from anybody else but but a sweaty, plump, elderly, panting man who's smaller than Danny DeVito.

  2. #5762
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ArdeeBhoy View Post
    Anyway, anyone care to put even The Guarniad out of their misery...
    http://www.theguardian.com/football/...zaj?CMP=twt_gu
    Never mind 'Fatter', you all missed the chance to correct various eejits on the previous link and now even "Ingerland's finest" has waded in...
    http://www.theguardian.com/football/...and?CMP=twt_gu

  3. #5763
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie Darwin View Post
    What we can be sure if is that FIFA statutes only allow for one instance in which a player can represent two separate national associations in competitive A internationals:

    There is obviously a special instance here, and it is when a new association is formed on the former territory of another association. It seems to be consistent with the aforementioned rules that any new association that is formed would be entitled to cap previous representatives of the former association, provided they had permanent nationality and fulfilled any territorial requirement to be eligible for the breakaway association. There is no such clarity when a player tied to a third, unrelated association should decide they would like to change associations.
    Does article 8.2 definitely cover the situation of a new state/nationality or states/nationalities being formed from the splitting up of a former state? Did Montenegrins (without heritage or territorial ties to Serbia) automatically lose any right to post-split Serbian citizenship (assuming the pre-split citizenship was not continuous) when Serbia & Montenegro was divided into two?

    What situation exactly does "without his consent or against his will due to a decision by a government authority" cover and does the phrase create strict criteria? Did Montenegrins lose their former citizenship without their consent or against their will, for example?

  4. #5764
    Capped Player
    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,333
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,737
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,827
    Thanked in
    1,928 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ArdeeBhoy View Post
    Never mind 'Fatter', you all missed the chance to correct various eejits on the previous link and now even "Ingerland's finest" has waded in...
    http://www.theguardian.com/football/...and?CMP=twt_gu
    I suppose the English FA, can if they want, opt out of the UK agreement in order to pick a few free willing resident players in their middle to late 20's, forgotten by the country of their birth.
    ATM, they assume any player would willingly wait 5 years, just dying to don the 3 lions shirt, that no player in their right mind would give a fiddler's fart for a backwoods place like Albania and it's completely out of the equation that the kid would ever consider a move (inside the 5 years) to a club in another country, because of his pure love for England.
    Didn't this (eliminating residency from the criteria) part of the UK agreement come about because the other 3 FA's were concerned about the FA scooping up their best players?
    Does the dog wag the tail in this UK agreement thing, or does the tail (sfa wfa ifa) wag the dog (FA) in the form of a democratic vote?
    The English FA could get fed up with puny, servile, annoying whiny accented mini brits like the IFA, telling them what's what.

  5. #5765
    Banned. Children Banned. Grandchildren Banned. 3 Months. Charlie Darwin's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,577
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,890
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,310
    Thanked in
    3,368 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DannyInvincible View Post
    Does article 8.2 definitely cover the situation of a new state/nationality or states/nationalities being formed from the splitting up of a former state? Did Montenegrins (without heritage or territorial ties to Serbia) automatically lose any right to post-split Serbian citizenship (assuming the pre-split citizenship was not continuous) when Serbia & Montenegro was divided into two?

    What situation exactly does "without his consent or against his will due to a decision by a government authority" cover and does the phrase create strict criteria? Did Montenegrins lose their former citizenship without their consent or against their will, for example?
    I don't know the situation with the break-up of Serbia and Montenegro, whether people from the latter were offered citizenship of Serbia. I can't see that article being complete enough to cover all instances though.

  6. #5766
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie Darwin View Post
    I don't know the situation with the break-up of Serbia and Montenegro, whether people from the latter were offered citizenship of Serbia. I can't see that article being complete enough to cover all instances though.
    Can we be certain its purpose is to cover such a situation at all? Wasn't the split democratic, consensual and willing (by and large)?

  7. #5767
    Seasoned Pro Crosby87's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,767
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    307
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    595
    Thanked in
    417 Posts
    Yeah would people of the later want citizenship to Serbia?
    No Somos muchos pero estamos locos.

  8. #5768
    Banned. Children Banned. Grandchildren Banned. 3 Months. Charlie Darwin's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,577
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,890
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,310
    Thanked in
    3,368 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DannyInvincible View Post
    Can we be certain its purpose is to cover such a situation at all? Wasn't the split democratic, consensual and willing (by and large)?
    I don't think its intention is to cover that at all, and I suspect the lack of a formal rule for such cases is down to FIFA not wanting to encourage breakaway associations.

    Quote Originally Posted by Crosby87 View Post
    Yeah would people of the later want citizenship to Serbia?
    There's a Serb minority in Montenegro like everywhere else in the former Yugoslavia. There are a few Kosovan Serbs in the current Serbia set-up.

  9. #5769
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie Darwin View Post
    I don't think its intention is to cover that at all, and I suspect the lack of a formal rule for such cases is down to FIFA not wanting to encourage breakaway associations.
    But you do still maintain that it covers such a break-up situation though (even if unintentionally)? Unless I've misunderstood, isn't that what you were arguing in post #5758? I'm not so sure if it does at all.

  10. #5770
    Banned. Children Banned. Grandchildren Banned. 3 Months. Charlie Darwin's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,577
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,890
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,310
    Thanked in
    3,368 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DannyInvincible View Post
    But you do still maintain that it covers such a break-up situation though (even if unintentionally)? Unless I've misunderstood, isn't that what you were arguing in post #5758? I'm not so sure if it does at all.
    Sorry, I wasn't clear. I was saying that's the only situation FIFA statutes cover formally and breakaway associations is a separate case that's not covered in the statutes but nevertheless occurs.

  11. #5771
    Capped Player
    Joined
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,925
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,880
    Thanked in
    2,796 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie Darwin View Post
    I suspect the lack of a formal rule for such cases is down to FIFA not wanting to encourage breakaway associations.
    That's my view too.

  12. #5772
    Capped Player
    Joined
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,925
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,880
    Thanked in
    2,796 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ArdeeBhoy View Post
    Never mind 'Fatter', you all missed the chance to correct various eejits on the previous link and now even "Ingerland's finest" has waded in...
    http://www.theguardian.com/football/...and?CMP=twt_gu
    I think young Jack has his eye on this job vacancy

    http://news.sky.com/story/1151663/to...n-from-the-edl

  13. #5773
    Capped Player
    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,333
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,737
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,827
    Thanked in
    1,928 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie Darwin View Post
    Sorry, I wasn't clear. I was saying that's the only situation FIFA statutes cover formally and breakaway associations is a separate case that's not covered in the statutes but nevertheless occurs.
    I think FIFA are actually more supportive and proactive in this area, ready to do a deal (if the price is right).

    The rule was always there, that a parent association had to approve of a split/separation, like with Catalonia or Basque country, if they wanted to go solo. Naturally there's no question of the parent association's permission mattering, if a separated region has won independence and gained recognition.
    The problem Kosovo has, is more to do with the UN status being used as the criteria for acceptance. As it currently stands, the UN does not deserve that status because of the power and the exercise of the veto.
    It should be, that if a region has a majority of UN members in favour of recognition, then after 3 or 5 years period, it automatically becomes a member, regardless of Russia or China or US opposition. Kosovo independence is supported by the vast majority of European countries, not Russia or Serbia.

    It's UEFA who are the thorn in Kosova's cause to be recognised. It was UEFA who pulled back FIFA after FIFA gave Kosovo permission to play intl friendlies. It's Platini in particular who has a bee in his bonnet about Kosovo.

  14. #5774
    Banned. Children Banned. Grandchildren Banned. 3 Months. Charlie Darwin's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,577
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,890
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,310
    Thanked in
    3,368 Posts
    That's a mere supposition, geysir, based on no existing evidence. On the other hand, we have the FIFA statutes which clearly forbid a player from representing two separate associations at competitive A level and we have the word of the reputable anti-slavery campaigner Herr Blatter.

  15. #5775
    Capped Player
    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,333
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,737
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,827
    Thanked in
    1,928 Posts
    The thread has evolved to a better place Charlie, keep pace with your own theory.

  16. #5776
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts

  17. Thanks From:


  18. #5777
    Seasoned Pro
    Joined
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    3,021
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    860
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    687
    Thanked in
    491 Posts
    Watched Mclaughlin playing on the left of a front three for liverpool 21s on Monday. Serious footballer, scored, won peno, brought a couple of good saves from keeper and some nice crossing. Hopefully he comes into the fold. He looks ready for first team football. Tottenhams irish winger was there best player very light though very hard to see him playing premiership football.

  19. Thanks From:


  20. #5778
    Reserves
    Joined
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    883
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    71
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    252
    Thanked in
    156 Posts
    McLaughlin is supposed to be terrific and a lot of Pool fans reckon he will get game time this year, though it might depend on whether Liverpool remain challenging for the Champions League places.

    I've been very impressed with McEvoy. Hope you're wrong about him not making it though!!

  21. #5779
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by liamoo11 View Post
    Tottenhams irish winger was there best player very light though very hard to see him playing premiership football.
    Due to his physique? He could always bulk up, like his doppelgänger did.

  22. #5780
    First Team
    Joined
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Torquay, Australia
    Posts
    2,324
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    665
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    510
    Thanked in
    358 Posts
    The London Indo has compiled a list of English sporting individuals who would not have been able to represent England under Wilshere's theory of eligibility. It would be interesting if we listed our own list as I think it would pretty long too!

    http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/f...gallery&ino=50
    Last edited by gastric; 14/10/2013 at 6:37 AM.

  23. Thanks From:


Similar Threads

  1. Eligibility Rules, Okay
    By TheOneWhoKnocks in forum Rubbish
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03/02/2017, 11:17 AM
  2. Eligibility Rules, Okay
    By geysir in forum Rubbish
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12/11/2013, 9:47 AM
  3. Problem - eligibility
    By SkStu in forum Support
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 25/05/2011, 8:14 AM
  4. Eligibility proposal
    By paul_oshea in forum Ireland
    Replies: 1111
    Last Post: 02/01/2008, 8:20 AM
  5. Eligibility Rules
    By Stuttgart88 in forum Ireland
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10/11/2004, 5:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •