In the sense it devalues the Olympics?
Oi, I see what you did there!
Why do you think it strange though? I have no opinion on its supposed "strangeness" either way; to clarify my position, it's as "normal" or "strange" as any other Olympic sport, surely. Is your thinking along the same lines as osarusan and do you see Olympic football as similarly strange then?
On McIlroy, I wonder what McIllroy's NI faithful make of his wavering? Will he too be accused of being a bigot if he declares for Ireland?...
McDowell reckons a denial of choice is the solution: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/golf/22291923
I heard they were fairly lax; being born in a stable does not make one a horse.As an aside but still on track, I wonder what the eligibility rules were for those horses and did the winning horse take home the medal?
Except most of their fanbase in the North are paranoid. So what's new?
And it will be none or all who have the choice;though ultimately any selection criteria is down to the IOC and that sport's governing body.
But golf shouldn't be in the Olympics anyway;just another tournament. Like the tennis.
McIlroy enjoys cross community support amongst the golfing fraternity in Northern Ireland - I play golf at a "mixed" Club, and in a "mixed" fourball most Saturdays - we'll all be supporting McIlroy whoever he decides to play for -if he plays at all.
I suspect most of the venim directed at him when (if) he makes his choice of whom to represent will come from those who don't care much for golf - it'll come from those for whom "themuns" and "usuns" is about the limit of their understanding of "identity" in this part of the world.
The Englishmen came over in the year 2005
But little did they know that we'd planned a wee surprise
Sir David scored the winner, and Windsor Park went wild
And this is what we sang...
The Englishmen came over in the year 2005
But little did they know that we'd planned a wee surprise
Sir David scored the winner, and Windsor Park went wild
And this is what we sang...
The religious divide is all down to old principle of 'divide-and-rule' as practiced by a certain dubious empire, amongst others.
This article, I feel, encapsulates the opinions of many on McIllroy and golf in the Olympics. It is interesting for me, as I do not experience all the hype and debate surrounding McIllroy.
http://www.independent.ie/opinion/co...-29246542.html
Last edited by gastric; 08/05/2013 at 11:27 PM.
I was disturbed to find myself broadly agreeing with Ian O'Doherty but luckily he padded the article with enough inane nonsense to allow me to continue to sleep peacefully.
McIlroy clearly identifies more with Britain than Ireland, as is his wont. I don't really understand why since being Irish is ****ing deadly, but we all have our minor eccentricities. But most of all he identifies with himself and his flip-flopping over the nationality issue is primarily an attempt to balance the commercial tightrope that is his life as a professional sportsman. It's hard to imagine McIlroy playing in the Olympics at all if there weren't millions of sponsorship dollars to be made from it.
These are the ages at which the following players started representing Ireland: Wilson (16), McCarthy (16), Gibson (15), Duffy (18). Very lazy journalism. McCarthy never switched from anyone, Gibson only played for the schoolboy team and they're all very young in the first place.
The Englishmen came over in the year 2005
But little did they know that we'd planned a wee surprise
Sir David scored the winner, and Windsor Park went wild
And this is what we sang...
Will be interesting to see what McIllroy does.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/ro...-1226642627657
The plot thickens...
http://www.irishgolfdesk.com/news-fi...d-south-a.html
Bookmarks