http://web.archive.org/web/200103041...s/Under18.html
The only appearance I could find mentioned is in a friendly against Germany in 1999, he definately didn't appear on the pitch in any of the 4 U18 qualifiers ROI played in 1999, so I doubt he is tied to the FAI, hence he wouldn't need to request a change of association.
He still should approach the IFA if he wants to play for NI, he's a 30 year old man ffs.
If wikipedia don't record it, then it never really happened anyway.
Were okay for goalies, ye can have Doherty.
The Englishmen came over in the year 2005
But little did they know that we'd planned a wee surprise
Sir David scored the winner, and Windsor Park went wild
And this is what we sang...
? McClean was tied by virtue of playing in an official competition at international level. (e.g UEFA qualifier U17-19-21).
If you've only played friendlies(at youth level) for a certain country, you don't have to request a change of association. I don't think that's nonsensical.
Last edited by Closed Account; 01/02/2012 at 9:25 PM.
Exactly. Read about all those Qataris, Portugese et al way back up thread.
Most of them just seemed to have played and not bothered their ass with anything else...
And we thought you were here to open up your mind and get edgercated, Not Brazil. Life's too short to be wasting your time here
How do you think Tony Kane could be capped for NI, then be capped for ROI and then back again to play for NI?
Sure anybody and everybody can play for everybody...
It's a p*ss-take of FIFA, FFS.
Read the whole thread.
![]()
Yep, it has been cast in stone since Jan 2004 that a player can only change once.
Kane played underage for NI before dandering down South in 2006, from where he defected/returned to the fold, in 2007.
Not Brazil, you need to brush up on the eligibility statutes
The debate has long since moved on to FIFA's flip flop wording of 'a player may only once request a change' and 'a player may only change once'.
The DUP's Dianne Dodds raised the eligibility issue in the European Parliament yesterday during a discussion on the Report on the European Dimension in Sport.
Video here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/...1328132566045#
She seems to believe it is appropriate to raise the issue of "naturalisations of convenience" in this context. Dismissing in such terms the Irish nationality of players who opt to play for the FAI is an insult. I don't know if she's going out of her way to offend or if she's just a bit thick.
Our friend Sam (Hello) just keeps on delivering
http://niandthebeautifulgame.weebly.....html#commentsHeard an interesting story about James McLean from a very reliable source prior to his switch to the FAI. Not only pressure from the FAI but pressure from other bodies and groups.
Was it the KKK?
Danny, I noted you spelt it Elite Player Menor (sic). we all know it's spelt NENTOR!
well done lad. But seriously, Get some sleep!
DID YOU NOTICE A SIGN OUTSIDE MY HOUSE...?
Interesting indeed. I'd like some clarification on this as Gary McAllister made a similar accusation the other week on Twitter, stating that "elements" were pressurising, abusing, intimidating and maybe even threatening players out of playing for the IFA/into playing for the FAI. Are they referring to political organisations or even paramilitary groups or what? And Sam wants to report Foot.ie to the police?!
Bookmarks