O.k I certainly wouldn't say that they deserve everything they get because this is not every coalition soldier. I know someone who's brother is currently fighting with the British army out there and you cannot say that because some members of an army commit atrocities then everyone deserves to be killed. You cannot excuse the killing of every British soldier because of what went on in Northern Ireland. Pitch cappings and the like were nothing short of inhumane but this doesn't excuse every British soldier who is killed (anywhere in the world). Mabye my opinion would be different if I had close relatives in the North.
This aside the American soldiers who commited these atrocities were SICK and should be punished to the full extent. They may have seen friends and comrades killed but this does not give them any right or any excuse to torture the POW's.
Again, parreles can be drawn wioth Northern Ireland on all fronts.
We were reading the article today with some people on the train and at the bit about this being a violation of the Geneva convention I pointed out that the Iraqis had already broken it. "Oh so that makes it alright then?" asked somebody. No! The point I was trying to make was in this war the Geneva convention has gone out the window. I wasn't excusing it, simply pointed out that NIETHER side has kept to the genva convention which certainly is not good.
It gives a terrible impression of a coalition which has already recieved such bad publicity but now the soldiers are being targeted and not the leaders. I can almost gairantee that this is no reflection on the vast majority of soldiers out there but might be played that way by the press.
On a footnote the "We didn't have copies of the Genva convention" argument is worthless and will never stand. You don't need it written down to know it's wrong to wire prisoners genitals up to electrodes.
Bookmarks