Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Irish parties in NI

  1. #21
    First Team The Fly's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,442
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    398
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,103
    Thanked in
    603 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by backtowalsall View Post
    Not sure about FF. Probably whatever the most used notes can be shoved into. Any suggestions?
    Waders.

  2. #22
    Coach John83's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    8,993
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,157
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,299
    Thanked in
    811 Posts
    At the cost of using an Americanism, sneakers.
    You can't spell failure without FAI

  3. #23
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Gather round View Post
    The DUP hardly have a hegemony, just domination in the slightly bigger half of a tiny pond. UUP and TUV barely have hegemony over their own back gardens.

    As usual, you're arguing that there's no point the Brit parties standing in NI (or generally anyone standing anywhere new) unless they win all or most of the seats, which is unnecesarily negative. Even a handful of seats in NI could be crucial in a future hung vote situation. In the bigger picture, the Tories should stand in their own name in all NI seats for the same reason that logically Fianna Fail should; anything else weakens their claim to be a fully 'national' party.
    The DUP have taken advantage of the polarisation of politics in the North and reduced their opposition to barely any credible presence. If that isn't a hegemony, I don't know what is....

    As for the Tories being inflicted on the North, given their record in Britain, why would even the insane in the Ballymena 'bible belt' be remotely interested in their latest form of aiding the rich and moral bankruptcy in general.
    Similarly Labour, LD's & FF who whilst not as bad, have hardly covered themselves in glory in recent times.

    They're hardly going to add anything positive to Northern politics, which based on electoral evidence isn't remotely interested in them.

    They're totally unionist only in the sense of being non-nationalist (ie like every party in Britain bar SNP, Plaid Cymru and, er Meibion Kernow). Although you could say they're closer to unionist than nationalist politics and get most of their support in majority-unionist areas.
    Except they're standing just in the North of Ireland.
    And maintaining the 'status quo' is a default unionist position in my book.
    And again that of most nationalist voters. 90% of whom would never consider voting for them, unless it was to get rid of a bigot like Peter Robinson. Which is the only thing they'd ever be good for.

  4. #24
    Coach BonnieShels's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wilkin's Ridge, Blackpool
    Posts
    12,087
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,431
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,662
    Thanked in
    1,825 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by backtowalsall View Post
    Personally I think they should merge with Labour and give the left a united voice.
    Finally reuniting the SF of old. Bleugh.
    DID YOU NOTICE A SIGN OUTSIDE MY HOUSE...?

  5. #25
    Seasoned Pro
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Tralee
    Posts
    2,846
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    275
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    281
    Thanked in
    221 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BonnieShels View Post
    Finally reuniting the SF of old. Bleugh.
    Except Labour never formed part of Sinn Féin, as they were founded in 1912, long before independence. Ritchie is ruling out mergers with any Southern party, but it's hard to see how they can regain ground otherwise.

  6. #26
    Coach BonnieShels's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wilkin's Ridge, Blackpool
    Posts
    12,087
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,431
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,662
    Thanked in
    1,825 Posts
    Sorry for the implication of Labour being part of SF. I was mainly talking about the Workers Party etc and its various iterations.

    You may find it hard to believe that they can't gain ground any other way other than through a merger but I can't understand how some people believe that the SDLP will be invigorated by the dynamic souls of FF.
    DID YOU NOTICE A SIGN OUTSIDE MY HOUSE...?

  7. #27
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    You're right.
    SDLP & Labour makes far more sense. Though agree their policies don't match currently. More of a Lib-Lab.pact to give it a British analogy.

  8. #28
    Seasoned Pro backstothewall's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,781
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    256
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    775
    Thanked in
    503 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ArdeeBhoy View Post
    You're right.
    SDLP & Labour makes far more sense. Though agree their policies don't match currently. More of a Lib-Lab.pact to give it a British analogy.
    There would be incredible social tension in that arrangement. Southern lefties just couldn't do business with northern "Green Tories". The SDLP are no longer the "we shall overcome" party. They have grown old, rich, and their membership have moved to the right.

    The problem with SF over the last decade has been the "whiff of sulphur" as Ryan Tubridy referred to it tonight when talking to Eamon Gilmore. But that is changing. After the next election SF in the Dail will be a selection of people like Pearse Doherty (33), Tomás Sharkey (34), Toiréasa Ferris (30), Pádraig MacLochlainn (35/36) and Mary Lou McDonald (41). Given that at the time of the ceasefire they were 17, 18, 14, 19/20 and 25, its hard to attach so much as a whiff to them, compared to the current SF TD's.

    Which is probably part of why Gilmore was trying to draw the distinction with SF on policy rather than moral grounds (he himself was in Official Sinn Fein). He recognises that eventually he will have to do business with them, and that he probably can do business with them.

    The likelihood is that after the next election no party will have a mandate to govern, or even be the senior party within a coalition. The bookies suggest something along the lines of

    Fine Gael: 51-55
    Fianna Fail: 46-55
    Labour: 46-50
    SF: 6-7
    Green: 1

    Having watched the PD's and Greens be destroyed by government, I doubt SF will be willing to race into government as a small coalition partner, and a FG-Lab coalition doesn't need them anyway. Obviously there will be a few independents, but it is very possible to see a scenario where some kind of arrangement between Labour and SF comes about to make them the biggest party in the Dail and make Gilmore Taoiseach.

    Furthermore, if SF and Labour can take the best of both parties they could become a very credible outfit. Labour get republican credentials, experience of government in the north, and a name seeped in history from SF, SF get respectability and serious economic and European policy platforms from Labour, and together they unite they reunite the traditions of Connolly and Pearse. I know it sounds a bit pie in the sky, but anything can happen in coalition negotiations.

    If they pulled it off, FF and the SDLP would hop into bed quicker than 2 arts college freshers, and FG would be stuck between a 'Fianna Fail - The Republican Party' rock, and a 'Sinn Fein - The Labour Party' hard place. They couldn't possibly put FF back into power, so they would be forced to become a junior coalition party, and take all the sh1t that comes with the job.
    Bring Back Belfast Celtic F.C.

  9. #29
    International Prospect
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    571
    Thanked in
    446 Posts
    That argument definitely has its merits and recognise SF is a more natural bedfellow to the ILP, though they don't seem as credible or respected (unsurprisingly!) in the current Irish state over their status in the North.
    And the ILP voters I know seem closer to the SDLP in their stance on many issues, though would be delighted to be proved wrong generally.

  10. #30
    International Prospect bennocelt's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Basel (Allschwil)
    Posts
    5,829
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,823
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    436
    Thanked in
    335 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by backtowalsall View Post
    The problem with SF over the last decade has been the "whiff of sulphur" as Ryan Tubridy referred to it tonight when talking to Eamon Gilmore. .
    Stopped reading after that!!! I mean come on!!!! Ryan Turgidy, please!!!!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 226
    Last Post: 29/04/2007, 12:38 PM
  2. Best Man and Stag Parties
    By A face in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 27/06/2006, 1:33 PM
  3. Political Parties
    By max power in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 03/03/2006, 8:06 AM
  4. Halloween Parties
    By pedro in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 29/10/2005, 8:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •