Weekend Latest

[pineapple stu]

It would, yeah. Wonder if he could bulk up any? Don't think he's that much smaller than Gary Dicker was with us, and Gary's doing grand in England.

[Lamper.sffc]

Not that close actually. About a yard wide. I'd imagine we had a better angle than you in fairness. How good is Finn btw? If I could sign any player in the league it'd be him. Still thought McAllister was the best player on the park. His goal showed everything a midfielder needs. Wins the ball, runs 50 yards with it, plays it through, continues his run, collects a poor enough ball back and buries it with his supposed weaker foot.

Great feeling walking out of the ground last night. Any nuetral watching would've been happy to see two good teams give eveything too

Well ill just wait to see it on mns before ill take your word for it. Iv seen your post on our crowd so im guessing your judgement may not have been the best last night

Finn is pure class. Him and williams will be the two players we will find it hardest to hold onto for next season. I think they may get moves across the water.
McAllister is pure class. Watched him at Shels and the guy was nearly always there best player. Good Rush man, sure why wouldnt he be.

As for the game, it was great game alright. Its even harder to be on the losing side when its as good a game as that.

All the best anyway, Hope ya push the Rovers all the way and we can nick 3rd

[Dodge]

Pats goals now up if you want to relive the moments lamper

http://www.stpatsfc.com/main.php

That McAllister goal;

[osarusan]

Pats goals now up if you want to relive the moments lamper

Some lengthy bans there for inciting your own crowd.

Also, the defender claiming offside for the 3rd should be shot.

[Dodge]

They're in reverse order on the website (e newest vid first) so that'd be our first goal (Vinny faherty's)

[Lamper.sffc]

Pats goals now up if you want to relive the moments lamper

http://www.stpatsfc.com/main.php

That McAllister goal;

They where all offside.

On a side note, I dont think mahon was watching the same game I was, the better side in the second half? Dont think so. Biased views methinks. For the first 10 or so minutes, maybe. And as for the first half, well its hard to break down a team who just come to defend and pack out the midfield. I love the way he mentions how people are saying we are a good footballing side and he calls that a load of old guff or something to that effect, when earlier in the season he was talking about how fingal where a good footballing side Anyway I think the statement was more out of frustration at others claiming Pats dont play good football, but it would be appreciated if he would leave us out of it.

[Dodge]

Clearly the better side in the 2nd half lamper. We "won" that half 3-1 btw.

[Lamper.sffc]

Clearly the better side in the 2nd half lamper. We "won" that half 3-1 btw.

Cant agree. Obviously goals win games (dont forget we did have what looked to be a good goal disallowed to make it 2-0) and I dont begrudge you the win (not much anyway).

There is more needed than just playing nice football, i know this, but there is no way you will convince me Pats where the better team in a footballing sense, as in more posession, more chances, better passing, which is what mahon is trying to make out in order to try and get across his idea that Pats played the better football and do play good football.
If its down to being more clinical in front of goal then fine but outplaying us in a footballing sense, nah I aint buying it.

[pineapple stu]

Who said anything about outplaying in a footballing sense?

[Dodge]

I think thats what he was indicating in fairness, and he has a point.

Don't see how lamper can say Pats packed the midfield when we played the same amount of players there as yourself? We did have more chances, we had similar levels of possession and I felt we dictated the pace for the majority of the second half. There were plenty of hurried long clearances from Fingal defenders too.

Its not like mahon criticised Fingal either. He just said we were the better side in the second half. Something borne out by the win IMO

[Lamper.sffc]

I think thats what he was indicating in fairness, and he has a point.

Don't see how lamper can say Pats packed the midfield when we played the same amount of players there as yourself? We did have more chances, we had similar levels of possession and I felt we dictated the pace for the majority of the second half. There were plenty of hurried long clearances from Fingal defenders too.

Its not like mahon criticised Fingal either. He just said we were the better side in the second half. Something borne out by the win IMO

Fair enough. I guess we all see these games how we want to see them and we both have different ideas on how the game went and when all is said and done, fingal still lost.