Quoteexactly, the only person responsible for the financial mess shels found themselves in is Oillie Byrne and at Bohs the blame falls to the members , Fenlon worked on the budget agreed at board levelOriginally Posted by peadar1987
As I've said before, Fenlon will have been given a budget at every club he has managed. It's not his job to decide it, or question it, and if he had suddenly decided that he wasn't going to spend the cash that the money-men were throwing his way, they would quickly have replaced him with someone who would. Fenlon should be judged on his skills as a football manager, not on what went on in the boardrooms of clubs he happened to be managing.
exactly, the only person responsible for the financial mess shels found themselves in is Oillie Byrne and at Bohs the blame falls to the members , Fenlon worked on the budget agreed at board level
Did Fenlon not go over the budget agreed last season? Resulting in someone resigning when they found out?
To a degree, but managers can't just use "they gave me the budget"/ "I'll just bury my head in the sand" excuses forever. If fans at the club, and fans in the league in general, can see there's sustainability issues around the budget, is it right to give the manager a total free pass?
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
Rico decided not to spend money with Cork City after the league win cos he knew we could not afford too and was right to do so. but 2006 was a disappointing season as a cork city fan in the league.
west cork district league
west cork commandos
Did he have the final say on who gets what? I'm sure every financial decision has to be sanctioned by the board, every manager will ask for a few quid extra its up to the people in charge to say yes or no. I'd imagine the guy at bohs resigned due to the deciosions made by his fellow boardmembers.
No, Nutsey requested an increased budget which was signed off by the Board in the absense of the Financial Director who was on holidays. On his return he (Financial Director) felt obliged to step down. There was a number of other factors in the whole debacle but thats the nub of what happened.
Boards decide budgets and while every manager wants to maximise his budget the decision (and responsibility) is with the Board (or owner in Shels case)
How did last night go for ya's? any idea how much was raised?
It may have had to be sanctioned by the board but surely Fenlon should have known himself that with the financial constraints already on the club he should never have even asked. The board member may have felt pressured to grant it.
Nutsy requested an increase? Would the word 'demanded' describe his request more accurately?
Sorry, didnt realise you were there. or are you just assuming he demanded it?
I agree the buck stops with the board, but it's ridiculous to suggest that Fenlon bears no responsibility whatsoever, in particular given that he requested a budget increase at a time when every man and his dog knew the club was effectively insolvent. Fenlon surely knew better than most that even the current budget was completely unsustainable, and any increase was only likely to bring the demise of our great club even closer. So even asking for an increase was outrageous. But I suppose if your main ambition is to secure a bigger job in Britain, then short term results are more important than long term stability of the club. Looks like all's well that end's well for Pat.
Does anyone know how much Fenlon asked for the budget to be increased? The club finished one place off qualifying for Europe so a small increase wasn't necessarily an imprudent investment. In any case, it's not the manager's job to watch the club's accounts and it seems petty to criticise Fenlon for doing what every other manager in the league does.
The club clearly wasn't effectively insolvent. If the club was insolvent, they should never have started the season in the first place and any request to increase the budget would be irrelevant.
oh boy! I'd like to see if people here would have thought it a prudent investment at the time if it had been approved!! Unfortunately you cant predict the future precisely and when Bohs takes a chance it tends to get scorched - the board made the right decision in saying no. Otherwise youre spot on.
I think Fenlon simply just asked for more by the way, dont recall specifics...
I like high energy football. A little bit rock and roll. Many finishes instead of waiting for the perfect one.
I don't know the figure. But as I said, the previously approved budget was way too high, so he should at the very least have been prepared to live with that.
Are you suggesting that Bohs increasing their budget so recently might have been "prudent"? Seriously?
Players only got paid at the end of last season as a result of loans from supporters. We have no way of clearing a large debt with Zurich when it becomes due in a few months, without selling our main asset, and at present the general consensus is it can't be sold. That's effectively insolvency. In any case, I have no interest in getting into a semantic argument about financial terminology. The point is, as I assume you know, Bohs are in a whole world of financial trouble and have been for a quite a while now.
Eh, I'm not an insider, but it seems to be generally accepted that the board said yes! (Although they clearly should have said no).
I would've thought it should be part of the managers job to be concerned about the health of the club in general though. Of course ultimate responsibility is with the board, and the manager is way down the list of those culpable, it's just the total escape of any blame is what I don't agree with. Just because most managers are like that, doesn't make it right.
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
Yep. That's why he's called a manager (and not a head coach).
Well, like I said, it depends on what the numbers were. A small budget increase could be the difference between a league place, getting the last European spot, getting to a cup final...
... or tipping a club over the edge...
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
Like I said, it depends on the numbers involved. If Bohs were concerned with mere survival they'd have slashed their budget far more than they did, but clearly that's not what the fans or the board wanted.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks