Rovers Accounts

**dfx-** · 17/08/2010, 2:39 PM

The value is correct as Jicked also alluded to.

I'm talking about the interpretation of that value.

**pineapple stu** · 17/08/2010, 2:52 PM

The exchange was -

Originally Posted by macy

Really? Given the losses an the accounts with the CRO?

Originally Posted by Jicked

Yes. Even if you take that as gospel, which I certainly wouldn't by any means

Which seems fairly straightforwardedly silly to me. Now fair enough if it was just phrased badly, and absolutely there's different ways of interpreting the figures depending on what caused the losses.

**Jicked** · 17/08/2010, 3:29 PM

It was just phrased badly, my mistake. I was trying to suggest that the figure mentioned at the start of the thread isn't the full picture.

**pineapple stu** · 17/08/2010, 3:56 PM

Fairy nuff so.

**El-Pietro** · 18/08/2010, 3:45 PM

Originally Posted by Jicked

Yes. Even if you take that as gospel, which I certainly wouldn't by any means, the debt incurred is nothing like what Shels, Drogheda, Cork and Bohs have run up to. I have no idea what Pats financial sitaution is, but judging by the cutbacks made to their squad this year, I'd presume it's a manageable budget.

We were financially stable in 2005 when we won the league, our problems didn't start until 2008.