No you didn't.
Don't say it ruins the thread; say why it ruins the thread.
No you didn't.
Don't say it ruins the thread; say why it ruins the thread.
The (admittedly somewhat vague ) idea is to provide an incentive for clubs not engaging in the wages bidding war that we have seen over the last decade. rather than recycling the same player pool via an inflated player transfer pool clubs would be encouraged to bring in newer players (probobly on lower wages) thus offering oppurtunities to young developing players and moving away from the current model. players would not necessarily come through the clubs youth set up but it would need clubs to interact more with junior and especially schoolboy clubs which should also better the game here.
I fully appreciate it is far from a "magic bullet" for the LOI ills and may well be similar to the restructuring model you allude to.
To be clear- I don't disagree with you at all, I was just pointing out the current problems and how they contribute to the 'recycling' of the same player pool within the league.
#NeverStopNotGivingUp
Yea agree RE limited pool - its not like clubs are not currently looking . The concept would need a bit of work but I do believe the focus on spiralling wages in the last decade has had a very negitive effect on the LOI. While deflation is making major inroads to the previous obsene wages payed to some players clubs do still engage in "bidding wars" for players. The short term nature of contracts (entered into for obvious financial reasons) is another factor as players are free agents after a short contract. One of the joys of LOI is how a player we "hated" last season quickly becomes a hero on signing for our club
I think that's a ridiculous analogy. Pouring money into one level of the game would cause a short term rise in the results there and cripple the other levels. In the medium term, a significant erosion of junior infrastructure would hurt the quality of players in the LoI and the national team, the latter curbing the FAI's income and leading to a long term decline in football in this country. To make a similar analogy to yours, what you're suggesting is like this country borrowing even more money and pouring it into the construction industry to prop it up at the levels of activity we had five years ago. Utter madness. I am fully behind the group of posters - people like Mr A, MariborKev and Pineapple Stu - who've seen what short term thinking has lead to in the league, and who believe in financial prudence and stable growth. What do you believe in? That a few million more ****ed into the league will magic up the crowds to pay for it? What did all the money Shels didn't have buy them, but a narrow defeat against Deportivo and years of struggling to pay for it?
You can't spell failure without FAI
Wow you really take everything literally don't you?
You're saying it as if I said we should forget all other levels of the game except the LOI - I didn't say that at all.
But your ignoring ther fact you said we shouldn't strive to become professional in the long term. Why? We need a professional league like most countries. And a professional industry will benefit everyone not just the clubs coffers.
Of course financial prudence should be rewarded, but we need to priortise marketing and facilites and linking with the other football levels, and get that mentality out of the clubs where they think paying higher wages will get the locals in.
No.
Where do you think the money will come from? Private investors? Someone else already ridiculed you for that suggestion.You're saying it as if I said we should forget all other levels of the game except the LOI - I didn't say that at all.
No, I didn't say that. I accused you of having a fetish with a professional league. Of course the league would benefit from becoming pro. I just think we can't get there by taking shortcuts and gambles.But your ignoring ther fact you said we shouldn't strive to become professional in the long term. Why? We need a professional league like most countries. And a professional industry will benefit everyone not just the clubs coffers.
I agree with every word of that.Of course financial prudence should be rewarded, but we need to priortise marketing and facilites and linking with the other football levels, and get that mentality out of the clubs where they think paying higher wages will get the locals in.
You can't spell failure without FAI
I didn't say all the money would come from private investors, I was suggesting the lack of private investment into the league. Did I ever suggest shortcuts/gambles with regard to a professional league? No, I'm suggesting more stronger efforts to get punters in which is priortising marketing/facilities instead of wages.
your suggestion to "Crop the number of clubs" and then to put more money into the LOI at the cost of junior leagues would first of all murder any potential for support from the wider footballing community clubs, leagues affilates etc which would be the death nail for your professional league.
your suggestion to get private investors is the reason the league is in the place its in right now.
all ideas are useless unless you have an overall plan because everything you do has a consequence, most of these things have been tried in the past and have failed
any hope of a professional league needs the full suport of all otherwise it is doomed to fail
I wish i did not know then what I dont know now
-Encourage clubs to merge as much as is possible by funding for clubs over a certain membership threshold for improving facilities. Obviously there is a huge potential for FAI fudging, but this could also help the nationwide spread of the game by targeting weaker areas
-Extra funding for "linked" clubs, so junior clubs that have a partnership with an LOI club get more funding
-A fairer compensation system for junior clubs whose players move to an LOI club.
-The possibility of dual registration, with an LOI club, and a junior club
With the ultimate aim of an LOI club in every major population centre (which would need a couple of more top level clubs; Mullingar, Meath, Kilkenny, etc.), with a pyramid of clubs below affiliated with the LOI club, actively trying to develop players for that club, as it makes financial sense for them to do it. The LOI clubs have loads of solid contacts with the football community at grass-roots level, the players at junior clubs aspire to play for the LOI clubs, and the league finally scrapes together enough money to hold weekly monkey knife fights. Everybody wins!
I think there the most important point to be made is that while wages have spun out of control in recent years, there has been no corresponding rise in attendances. I realise wages rose in every country, and Ireland had higher inflation than most places, but it still suggests that the reason players don't want to play in Ireland isn't just because the wages are lower.
Personally, having worked in PR, I feel Irish clubs have missed the boat completely with regard to promotion during the recession. Like most businesses, I presume the clubs reduced their promotion budgets when hard times hit when really they should have raised them to capitalise on the thousands of families who will no longer be able to afford trips to Manchester and Liverpool to see Premier League games. Rovers scored a major coup with the Real game, but they've done very little promotions-wise since.
My ma has been a teacher (and a member of the sports committee) in a school in Tallaght (I won't say which one) for years that is well within walking distance of Tallaght Stadium. The local GAA club that provided hurling and football classes to the school has recently withdrawn its football coach (in fact, he was laid off). The other local club offered to fill the gap but the original club has threatened to withdraw its hurling coach if they're allowed in.
Where are Shamrock Rovers in this? They've been in Tallaght for over a year and have yet to contact the school about any program. I know they have strong links with Tallaght IT, but they can hardly expect to tap into a steady stream of youngsters when they're all receiving GAA tutelage in school.
Exactly. The clubs should be visiting and promoting themselves in every school, pub, shop and sports club in the area, just to make themselves visible. Give out free pens, donate prizes to a charity raffle, sponsor bibs for a junior football team, have the players train in a school once every few weeks, run camps, just do something! Shams did really well with the original promotion of the club when they moved into Tallaght, but they can't afford to let up on it now.
The LOI is never going to be able to compete with the barstool leagues in terms of quality, or Andy Gray sensationalism. To get the crowds in, we have to differentiate ourselves from the competition, and the only real appropriate niche is as a competition firmly grounded in the community. As an example, most Corkonians would pay to watch tiddlywinks if there was a chance one of "their boys" was going to show up someone from Dublin
In fairness to Shamrock Rover they have some excellent connections with schools in Tallaght including a scholarship scheme with St Aidan's in Brookfield. I'd imagine some schools are a lot more open to inviting them in than others, information about the programme is here; http://www.shamrockrovers.ie/about/c...ools-programme
Charlie Darwin, maybe the school should make contact with the club? I know at least one school very close to the stadium (or at least it's principal) was one of the major forces trying to block Rovers getting into the stadium so it could be related to that?
Tallaght Stadium Regular
All these promotion ideas are all well and good, I don't disagree with them but what I will say is that even basic advertising is missing from our league. Take around Bray for example, if you never go near the ground for a week you'd never realise a game was on let alone a football club staged here.
Fully agree but WHO is going to do all this promotional work ? At Bohs players have gone to schools and done promotional work but they are full time. Not so sure that part time players already juggling a job (if lucky) training and playing would be too pleased to add further to their schedule. Similarly most club officials give voluntary of their time and imposing further on them is asking a lot. Again pens,prizes etc are not free - someone pays for them and as we all know there is not too much spare cash flowing around at clubs.
Not to knock the ideas proposed Peadar, far from it (all have merit) but when you start to look at implementing them it gets a little difficult.
I'd be firmly of the belief that if a club can scrape together the funds to pay a very average player a three figure sum each week, they have the capacity, with a little bit of prioritising, to scrape together the funds for a decent club promotion campaign. It's an example of the short-termism that blights the league. If you spend €100 a week on club promotion, and it attracts even 15 more people to the game, you've made a 50% return on your investment. Take, for example, donating club branded bibs to a local sports club or school. A set of six costs about €15. If one kid gets their dad to take them to one game, you've made back your investment almost twice over.
Bookmarks