Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 3 of 29 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 562

Thread: What the FAI thinks of progressive clubs:

  1. #41
    Banned bullit's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Shed End
    Posts
    1,988
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    505
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    459
    Thanked in
    305 Posts
    Riddickule,i wont argue on the Platinum1 issue(its been done),im a DFC supporter and the issue(their PLANS) do NOT sit well with me and/or most LOI fans.Plans C,D or E would be welcome though

  2. #42
    Reserves
    Joined
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    534
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts
    On the same date, July 31 the first ever match will be played in the Aviva Stadium, with a combined provinces rugby match between Connacht/ Munster and Ulster/Leinster.

    Could that be the 3rd party commercial agreement?

    Have the FAI got an agreement with the IRFU not to interfere in any way with their historic opening match in Lansdowne Road?



    I'd imagine Barca would steal all the sporting/news headlines that day?
    A transient, horrible, fantastic dream,
    Wherein is nothing yet all things do seem:
    From which we're wakened by a friendly nudge
    Of our bedfellow Death, and cry: "O fudge!"

    Ambrose Bierce

  3. #43
    Godless Commie Scum
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Co Wickla
    Posts
    11,396
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    138
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    656
    Thanked in
    436 Posts
    The FAI are spot on - you can't have meanlingness friendlies against glamour opposition mid season close to league fixtures...
    If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.

  4. Thanks From:


  5. #44
    First Team
    Joined
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,153
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    198
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    280
    Thanked in
    186 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DmanDmythDledge View Post
    I'm pretty sure that all friendlies have to FAI approved, although could get around it alright. Major stumbling block would be no insurance cover (I think; which is a big reason why they have to be FAI approved) so if somebody got injured I'd imagine the hosts (LFC) could be open to be sued.
    We played a friendly recently but as it wasn't FAI approved it was played behind closed doors. Maybe thats what Limerick and Barca should do!
    Manager: Fergal, have you your boots with ya?
    Fergal: Ya, I have them here.
    Manager: Ah good stuff, well give them to this man so, he forgot his!

  6. #45
    Seasoned Pro OneRedArmy's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Location
    London-Derry-Dublin
    Posts
    4,893
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    84
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    140
    Thanked in
    82 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Macy View Post
    The FAI are spot on - you can't have meanlingness friendlies against glamour opposition mid season close to league fixtures...
    .........unless all the money goes to them.

  7. Thanks From:


  8. #46
    Like the Fonz. Only a dog. Mr A's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2004
    Location
    In the gutter, but looking at the stars
    Posts
    11,554
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,761
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,355
    Thanked in
    1,550 Posts
    Irish Times piece on this: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...270378351.html

    Pretty mad that any club would budget for (and be allowed to do so) 100k profit from an unconfirmed friendly at licensing time, as is claimed in the article.
    #NeverStopNotGivingUp

  9. #47
    International Prospect Jofspring's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Limerick City
    Posts
    6,683
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    300
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    558
    Thanked in
    402 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Buile Shuibhne View Post
    On the same date, July 31 the first ever match will be played in the Aviva Stadium, with a combined provinces rugby match between Connacht/ Munster and Ulster/Leinster.

    Could that be the 3rd party commercial agreement?

    Have the FAI got an agreement with the IRFU not to interfere in any way with their historic opening match in Lansdowne Road?



    I'd imagine Barca would steal all the sporting/news headlines that day?
    I think you could be right here. There is no way the IRFU would allow the FAI santion a match that would jepordise the selling of tickets for the Rugby.

  10. #48
    Reserves A N Mouse's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    877
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    81
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    162
    Thanked in
    108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jofspring View Post
    I think you could be right here. There is no way the IRFU would allow the FAI santion a match that would jepordise the selling of tickets for the Rugby.
    Who owns Thomond Park?

  11. #49
    Seasoned Pro OneRedArmy's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Location
    London-Derry-Dublin
    Posts
    4,893
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    84
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    140
    Thanked in
    82 Posts
    I would imagine the FAI have the clubs over a barrel as presumably the participation agreement gives the FAI veto power over any game, but the reality is that this decision shows the FAI's vision of how football should look in Ireland.

    Its effectively franchise football, with any real revenue going centrally and clubs forced to cede control to Abbottstown and in return the clubs get to bring their begging bowl to queue for some more gruel.

    The FAI's statement is blatant that Limerick have stepped on their toes and encroached on revenue that they want for themselves. The reference to Platinum One above is apt. What we're seeing is no different.

  12. #50
    Banned marinobohs's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in the bar celebratingl
    Posts
    3,629
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    360
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    645
    Thanked in
    427 Posts
    CONGRATS TO THE FAI ! barely had they time to bask in the "glory" of the man ure fixture announcement (all genuflect) than they were upstaged by, God help us, a LOI club heavily armed with own initative. Quickly identifying the potential disaster that could ensue including
    - good PR generated by a LOI club
    - badly needed money injection to the game here
    - great advertisement for football in the region (and beyond)
    - a full Thomond for a game of football (something beyond the ability of the FAI)

    Fortunately our esteemed administrators sprung into action (no need for investigation here, boyos, speedy action needed) to ban the proposed game. In their infinite mercy the FAI will not impose sanctions on Limerick for this grave offence (but remember your place in future) and the good people of Limerick (and beyond) are spared the sight of the marquee team of world club football. Truely a great days work, how officialdom of rugby and bogball must look in awe at the wonderous manageement of the FAI.

    RE the possible clash with rugger game at Lansdowne (120 miles away !!!!) what remit do the FAI have to "protect" the interest of rugby ? The same one that will lead to the IRFU cancelling the Munster/Leinster match because it would detract from the SETANTA Cup final (roughly same distance apart) ?
    Last edited by pineapple stu; 20/05/2010 at 12:43 PM.

  13. #51
    Now with extra sauce! Dodge's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Insomnia
    Posts
    23,528
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    663
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,676
    Thanked in
    1,454 Posts
    BTW on the "independent" game, its a non runner as all games have to be sanctioned by national federations (ie barcelona won't play in a non UEFA sanctioned game (throuigh the FAI)), add in refs etc and its a complete non runner
    54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
    ---
    New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
    LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/

  14. #52
    Reserves
    Joined
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    534
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by marinobohs View Post

    RE the possible clash with rugger game at Lansdowne (120 miles away !!!!) what remit do the FAI have to "protect" the interest of rugby ? The same one that will lead to the IRFU cancelling the Munster/Leinster match because it would detract from the SETANTA Cup final (roughly same distance apart) ?

    The FAI and the IRFU are jointly funding the construction of the new Lansdowne.

    Have the FAI sold all the requisite seats / Vantage scheme to contribute their share?

    Do they owe the IRFU anything?
    A transient, horrible, fantastic dream,
    Wherein is nothing yet all things do seem:
    From which we're wakened by a friendly nudge
    Of our bedfellow Death, and cry: "O fudge!"

    Ambrose Bierce

  15. #53
    Reserves bluepowers's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2009
    Location
    limerick
    Posts
    485
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    28
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    hopefully limerick can get this match its huge for the club to succeed in the future ....

  16. #54
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    39,708
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,007
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,250
    Thanked in
    3,488 Posts
    What happens if Limerick go ahead and play the game anyway?

  17. #55
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    I don't even see why this is an issue. We all like to have a go at the FAI now and again, and it's utterly depressing that third-party commercial agreements (assuming the FAI wouldn't straight out lie about having them in place) with very little to do with Limerick, never mind the prospect of Limerick ever benefiting an ounce from them, would put a spanner in the works, but if these agreements do exist, the game just can't proceed.

    Indeed, it sounds like a really lame excuse to prevent a game of such magnitude from taking place, which is probably why they felt the need to provide another pretty lame-sounding excuse regarding Limerick being obliged to retain ownership of the date for league fixtures. As a poster earlier pointed out, it's likely that this is a UEFA rule of some sort and is probably in the participation agreement, up to which Limerick willingly signed. If it's in the participation agreement, then it was a bit daft of Limerick to go ahead and organise this without first consulting the FAI. I think some people are getting ahead of themselves. I have as many reservations about the FAI as the next man, but to believe that they "banned" this game out of spite, jealousy or some anti-Limerick/pro-Dublin bias is tinfoil hat talk. In this instance, I'm sorry to say that it's Limerick's fault for getting everyone's hopes up in the first place.

    I do admit, all this assumes that the reasons the FAI gave for refusing to sanction this game are not sly concoctions. I doubt the FAI would have such imagination.

    Unless, of course, someone "in the know" knows otherwise... If so, please share you knowledge, O fountain.

  18. #56
    Godless Commie Scum
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Co Wickla
    Posts
    11,396
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    138
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    656
    Thanked in
    436 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr A View Post
    Pretty mad that any club would budget for (and be allowed to do so) 100k profit from an unconfirmed friendly at licensing time, as is claimed in the article.
    Licencing shown up as total farce, never would've seen that happening.

    All those posters that defended Delaney, and the "success" that they claimed the FAI running the league is a couple of months ago should be hanging their heads in shame.
    If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.

  19. #57
    New Signing joeSoap's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2003
    Location
    nomadic
    Posts
    5,828
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    18
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    23
    Thanked in
    18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    What happens if Limerick go ahead and play the game anyway?
    Who knows, but as was said earlier, theres no way Barca will agree to play a non-sanctioned game, for insurance purposes alone if nothing else.

  20. #58
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,738
    Thanked in
    2,284 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    What happens if Limerick go ahead and play the game anyway?
    Ha, that's actually a good question. If the punishment was the imposition of a fine, maybe it would be insignificant enough compared to the potential moneys that the game itself would bring in if they went ahead and played it. I'd guess the punishment would be much more severe than this though. Maybe they'd be kicked out of the league or relegated. Still, didn't someone mention something about insurance and that any player who was involved in the game would have to be released from their contracts and re-registered again after? Sounds like a complete legal quagmire.

  21. #59
    Banned marinobohs's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in the bar celebratingl
    Posts
    3,629
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    360
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    645
    Thanked in
    427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DannyInvincible View Post
    I don't even see why this is an issue. We all like to have a go at the FAI now and again, and it's utterly depressing that third-party commercial agreements (assuming the FAI wouldn't straight out lie about having them in place) with very little to do with Limerick, never mind the prospect of Limerick ever benefiting an ounce from them, would put a spanner in the works, but if these agreements do exist, the game just can't proceed.

    Indeed, it sounds like a really lame excuse to prevent a game of such magnitude from taking place, which is probably why they felt the need to provide another pretty lame-sounding excuse regarding Limerick being obliged to retain ownership of the date for league fixtures. As a poster earlier pointed out, it's likely that this is a UEFA rule of some sort and is probably in the participation agreement, up to which Limerick willingly signed. If it's in the participation agreement, then it was a bit daft of Limerick to go ahead and organise this without first consulting the FAI. I think some people are getting ahead of themselves. I have as many reservations about the FAI as the next man, but to believe that they "banned" this game out of spite, jealousy or some anti-Limerick/pro-Dublin bias is tinfoil hat talk. In this instance, I'm sorry to say that it's Limerick's fault for getting everyone's hopes up in the first place.

    I do admit, all this assumes that the reasons the FAI gave for refusing to sanction this game are not sly concoctions. I doubt the FAI would have such imagination.

    Unless, of course, someone "in the know" knows otherwise... If so, please share you knowledge, O fountain.
    The only thing we "know" is the facts before us - that is the respective statements of Limerick and the FAI. Based on that people have surmised that it is yet another balls up by the Abbotstown muppet show.
    None of the reasons put forward by the FAI todate are deserving of any credence and until that changes people can only judge them on their own words.

  22. #60
    Youth Team
    Joined
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    168
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    23
    Thanked in
    16 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DannyInvincible View Post
    I don't even see why this is an issue. We all like to have a go at the FAI now and again, and it's utterly depressing that third-party commercial agreements (assuming the FAI wouldn't straight out lie about having them in place) with very little to do with Limerick, never mind the prospect of Limerick ever benefiting an ounce from them, would put a spanner in the works, but if these agreements do exist, the game just can't proceed.

    Indeed, it sounds like a really lame excuse to prevent a game of such magnitude from taking place, which is probably why they felt the need to provide another pretty lame-sounding excuse regarding Limerick being obliged to retain ownership of the date for league fixtures. As a poster earlier pointed out, it's likely that this is a UEFA rule of some sort and is probably in the participation agreement, up to which Limerick willingly signed. If it's in the participation agreement, then it was a bit daft of Limerick to go ahead and organise this without first consulting the FAI. I think some people are getting ahead of themselves. I have as many reservations about the FAI as the next man, but to believe that they "banned" this game out of spite, jealousy or some anti-Limerick/pro-Dublin bias is tinfoil hat talk. In this instance, I'm sorry to say that it's Limerick's fault for getting everyone's hopes up in the first place.

    I do admit, all this assumes that the reasons the FAI gave for refusing to sanction this game are not sly concoctions. I doubt the FAI would have such imagination.

    Unless, of course, someone "in the know" knows otherwise... If so, please share you knowledge, O fountain.
    ---

    I do admit, all this assumes that the reasons the FAI gave for refusing to sanction this game are not sly concoctions. I doubt the FAI would have such imagination.

    ----

    The FAI are broke because of non-sales of over-priced Premium tkts and need all their imagination to pay their debts.

    It's clear from this that any attempt to take potential earnings away from their coffers is met with the screech of brakes. 'Third party' muck is a smoke-screen.

    Football in this country is run on a Nazi basis - with John Delaney as Hitler.

Page 3 of 29 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. What the FAI thinks of progressive clubs:
    By bluepowers in forum Rubbish
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 17/05/2010, 12:10 AM
  2. Progressive Democrats Future
    By pete in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 24/09/2008, 7:22 AM
  3. No wonder the Chinese are so progressive
    By A face in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 23/10/2007, 12:07 PM
  4. What Roy thinks
    By beautifulrock in forum Ireland
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12/10/2004, 6:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •