QuoteWill this be discussed tom or will it be left to the legal people.
Have you inside info Foxford Red sounds like alot of money to sign on when funds are tight. Probably less i hope......
Will this be discussed tom or will it be left to the legal people.
i meant shamrock rovers and i have inside info
it's important to clear up the matter of chris turner getting k10 from "rovers".
it certainly was'nt from sligo rovers he got it. my own opinion is that he has got himself into very big trouble from a legal point of view. we shall wait & see. what seems now a very dark cloud over hanging sligo rovers will be much darker when it blows the way of the "shams".
can sligo rovers clear up why they told us a player was signed on a 2 year contract and 3 months later joins another club. kevin l said we should n0t blame the club but if a legal contract was signed how can the player sign another one for shams ??? this is the answer i want.
was the contract not binding as shams supporters say or has chris turner illegally signed for another club while still signed with sligo rovers ??? can we please have some answers !!!
How very dare you refer to Shams as 'Rovers'. There's only one Rovers in this country (well, we'll allow you Three Rock Rovers, the hockey team).Originally Posted by foxfordred
The contract wasn't binding until the player was registered and that could not be done until Jan 15th. It seems that, prior, the cailin kicked Chris out of the leaba, shouting things along the lines of 'they ate babies in Sligo and we're not going'. Now, the question is - do we want someone at the club who puts women and children before The Rovers?
so really and truely the contract was not worth the paper it was printed on !!! thats ridiculous the fai need to look into that and stop future clubs from been taking as mugs. shams are welcome to turner the dirty *******.shams can do what they like cos its suits the fai to have bohs challenged and glamourize the league and 6000 attendances. so again we see how this great country loves stepping on the little people and the rich become lawless......
would ya expect anything else........ shower of *****
That is simply not legal. If Chris signed a two year contract with rovers it is binding for a period of two years. End of. If these are the FAI rules they are easily challenged in court, meaning the FAI would owe rovers compensation. If not then Turner and Shams are liable.
I have little doubt that we'll do well out of this yet.
Don't forget Brittany and the Belfry. And when did you ever see us do well out of anything?
I still don't understand that analogy
This is different, the law is the law. There is no way a contract can simply be broken like that, the FAI is not at liberty to decide when contracts become valid.
[QUOTE=Rovers1;1314541]http://www.loi.ie/index.php/about/pr...g-chris-turner
in other words, the fai have rejected shams contract with turner as he is under contract with another club, us.
someone said today that first game of the season was us v shams in the showgrounds is this true ???
[QUOTE=bingoballs;1314561]There will be mediation to sort it out. Sligo will get a few quid for him.
Champions 2010
Champions 2011
Dick Brush 1 Sligo 0
Bohs are going bust.
[QUOTE=hoops1;1314584]We will be in the red over the deal. All the wages we have dished over to him will not be recouped. - Thats the word I've heard from my workplace, and thats fairly reliable.
ever the optomist inside man !!!
If there will be mediation and compensation payed that means that Turner was under contract.Does it not.No contract(as shams have repeatedly stated on here) no compo due.
The issues this throws up are that he will have signed For 3 clubs in the year and rovers will have illegally approached an under contract player(sanctions no?) .
I have no doubt the contract wasnt registered for this season as the FAI are not registering any contracts until budgets are approved.However i would be fully sure that turner has been paid on the back of and as per the contract he signed with sligo and im sure his payslips(licencing) will back this up.
I do expect Shams to get away with it on a technicality ie FAI rules prohibiting the registration but its very sneaky from the moral guardians of the league
If a club is sanctioned for giving 2 contracts to players then a player should be sanctioned for having 2 contracts with 2 different clubs.
I would like to see Turner given a 12 month ban. This sort of carry on cant be tolerated.
Hi Rovers100%,
I never said "Dont blame the Club"
I said this is going down a certain route and as soon as there is further developements, then the Club will make a statement.
At the end of the day, this is a message board and like life, everything will come out in the wash!
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks