i think its a case of a lot of wishful thinking .... on both sides
Incidently does a deal have to be completed before the financial submissions deadline
I wish i did not know then what I dont know now
You can be forgiven for concluding that the previous few pages relate to the SCP, they don`t.
The potential "deal " with Albion has no impact on the 2009 SCP or on financial projections for the 2010 SCP . It may however have future financial benefit for the club in that it would ensure that the Danninger deal is unencumbered and can proceed if Danninger has the funds (unlikely as that might be.) In the event that Danninger cannot proceed it will be a matter for the club to consider other offers, one of which may be from Albion.
"The Sun" is hardly the paper of record, there was absoloutely no connecton with the SCP made by those club officials proposing a settlement with Albion. There may, if an arrangement is concluded with Albion, be consequential income to be taken into account in future calculations of future SCP`s.
Through the hard work and financial contributions made by members supporters players and club employees and stunning successes on the field of play, we just about made it under the wire on the 65%. Get over it.
As for next season, I would say that meeting the new SCP arrangement will be difficult for us but will be acheivable. If there is some arrangement finalised with a purchaser of Dalymount which can legitimately be counted as income in accordance with the SCP in 2010,then obviously that will make acheiving the SCP a lot easier.
Ah now. The tabloids are usually very good with regards LoI rumours. I don't think you can dismiss an article just because it's in The Sun. If you have other reasons, feel free to put them out there, but you can't dismiss things just like that. Or are you accusing the paper of deliberately misrepresenting the Bohs EGM?
No, I`m just stating that they mistakenly mixed up two quite seperate matters. Admittedly its a complex set of issues which at times has confused even the most assiduous posters on the topic on this site
I would agree that the Sun does have a track record of reporting rumours as facts.
I attended the said EGM and know what was proposed.
Sorry Stu, don't have a link (and not aware of one) but it was mentioned at the EGM that the new arrangement would take away the need for an appeal (Thank God, judging on our form in the Courts ) I expect it would be included in the terms of the agreement with Albion when finalised.
I doubt very much they 'got it wrong'. Id imagine they chose to ignore it and subsequently got punished.
This time however, if they choose to ignore it, the embargo wont (shouldnt) be lifted therefore theyll be paying money to players that cant play.
None of that means they dont know one way or another, its still quite easy to work out 65%.
1) They know they are under the 65% therfore are signing players
2) They know they are over the 65% are signing players anyway in a show of financial recklessness Tom Coughlan would be proud of and hoping for the best.
Either way they know one way or another if there accountants(or anyone with a calculator) can count.
When will the FAI decide if teams were under the 65% SCP for the season just finished? And when will/did the relevant paperwork have to be submitted? Is/was it possible to alter/amend the paperwork after the deadline has passed?
I'm pretty sure there's a meeting coming up on Monday to do with some aspect of licensing.... Could be wrong though
what recommendations did the league make on the 22nd of December and to whom? And can you disclose the nature of the recommendations made on the 22nd of December and if you could provide a link that would be great too.
Also, you were coming out with this definitive line (embargo will not be lifted for Bohs) well prior to December 22nd so was that all a big steaming pile of sh**e too like the rest of the guff you spout?
I like high energy football. A little bit rock and roll. Many finishes instead of waiting for the perfect one.
Linky.
*Waits for some manner of apologies from Bohs fans...*
so where does that say that the embargo will not be lifted for Bohemians which is BY's claim?
I like high energy football. A little bit rock and roll. Many finishes instead of waiting for the perfect one.
BYCTWD's claim is that the embargo hasn't been lifted. He's correct, it seems.
The link doesn't say it won't be lifted, but it does a hell of a lot more to back up his posts on the topic so far than Bohs fans'.
no, his claim has always been that Bohemians will not have the transfer embargo lifted.
And the link itself doesnt amount to much - importantly there are no quotes from the FAI. Maybe the Star article goes into more detail, gives sources and quotes, i dont know.
What would be interesting is if any other clubs who were placed under transfer embargo (im pretty sure we werent the only ones) have had theirs lifted. Then i would start to get concerned as to whether we were in trouble after all.
I like high energy football. A little bit rock and roll. Many finishes instead of waiting for the perfect one.
Bookmarks