If you are suggesting that the situation at Cork is better than the situation at Bohs then you are seriously deluded and I would recommend you ask any Cork fan about it. Still a lack of clarity around Drogs current position so difficult to comment too definitively, my point was that shams don't appear too concerned about (possible/alledged/etc) breaches of finanacial regulations there thus showing the "concern" about Bohs alledged transgretions to be little more than oppurtunism.
by the way, unlike shams I would wish nothing but the best for all clubs in finanacial difficulties (real or imagined) we are all in the League together.
Bohemian FC is a member owned club slightly (!!!!!) longer than shams so if Cork or Drogheda want any advice I doubt they will go to a club that previously slagged off member owned clubs in their match day programme.
Last edited by marinobohs; 25/01/2010 at 12:13 PM.
Can you not accept that the ultras messageboard quite clearly posted details of the Fenlon/Dundee Utd story before they became public knowledge the whole way through. There's cold hard facts to back that up, it simply can't be brushed aside as bs. So if they were proved right about all other aspects of that deal, could they not also be correct about the final one? I say they could be believed at this stage having been proved to have insider knowledge the whole way through. If it is true, then I'm sorry but it does raise serious questions as to Bohs budget for this season. How can you not see this and just brush it aside as idle speculation and nothing to be worried about?
That's not actually true. (Couldn't be bothered going to through the thread to were this was pointed out previously), but the again that isn't any different to the majority of posts by Shamrock fans on this thread.
Thread title should just be changed to Bohs/Fenlon Rumours or alternatively What's going on at Bohs courtesy of Shamrock's fans.
[QUOTE=Jicked;1311794]Can you not accept that the ultras messageboard quite clearly posted details of the Fenlon/Dundee Utd story before they became public knowledge the whole way through.
Ě`ve no idea as your message board has been private members access only for some time now. The last time I had access to it they were ridiculing the notion that PF would be considered for the job by DUFC
There's cold hard facts to back that up, it simply can't be brushed aside as bs.
Now we`re getting somewhere , cold hard facts....and they are?
So if they were proved right about all other aspects of that deal, could they not also be correct about the final one?QUOTE]
Proved right about which rumour? That Fenlon can walk free from Bohs for breach of contract?
or
Fenlon stays with Bohs after getting 90k bonus paid?
or
Fenlon signs two year deal with DUFC?
None of the above rumours have come to pass.
We`ve also had to put up with dross from Hooped rumour mongers aided and abetted by some Stillorgan Road Tech perennial undegrads on this Forum about our budgets being based on three trophy wins and dodgey deals with Development companies to evade the SCP, being sued by Liam Carroll, not getting a fee for Deegan etc etc etc . Each and every one a malicious fabrication, so I think we can be forgiven for being sceptical about any "rumours" coming from a hooped direction.
I think its regrettable that the focus of this thread has been on responding to the unsubstantiated rumours/lies rather than on the real achievement of ordinary League of Ireland fans in raising tens of thousands of Euro in 2009 to keep our club successfully in business against the odds within the 2009 SCP.
Last edited by Dalymountrower; 25/01/2010 at 5:22 PM.
the always ultras message board is somewhere I have never been or want to be but the "details" posted here were that Bohs were in breach of contract and that Nutsey WOULD walk for free.
Now whatever world you are living in this did not occur on Planet Earth.
it is true that there was some outstanding bonuses, but this was, believe it or not, known beyond the confines of Tallaght
Those of us who did not accept the above (bolded) line will hardly accept any more "facts" from such an unreliable source.
PS wrong thread but as long as it is having a go at Bohs.......![]()
Sure arent yisser all the sameTo be fair some posters here have raised fair questions and some bohs posters have tried to respond (with our limited knowledge) but unfortunately the wind up merchants made a farce of it with unsubstanciated rubbish.
Nobody from UCD would ever indulge in WUMMING![]()
False hope is worse than no hope. Ask Sligo.
We are all aware that shams "invented" the members owned club in 2005 (previous quotes about 50 pound directors were the OTHER crowd) I never said either club was waiting to approach Bohs just suggested that a club which previously slagged off memebers owned clubs is hardly the place to go for advice about same.
Perhaps (given experience here) shams think membership entitles them to run every club in the League but afraid it isn't true.
Step one would be to become Irelands most succesful football club thus creating a sporting institution that just enough people wont let die ,throw in a couple of decades of blood sweat and tears from those individuals and a bit of luck then you might just have enough trojan fans left who would take out personal loans to try and wrangle a deal with the revenue and other creditors,at this point if you have become an integral part of a huge working class community through educational and sporting scholarships ,charity work etc and you have grown your schoolboy section in said area well the local council just might see it in their intrest to finish a ground for ya,
Bookmarks