GAA branded Nazi-like over Rule 42
GAA branded Nazi-like over Rule 42
The decision of the GAA to remove from its Congress agenda any discussion on the controversial Rule 42 - which precludes the playing of any so-called foreign sports at Gaelic grounds - has been branded "Nazi-like" by one of the Association’s own delegates.
A statutory committee has ruled eight motions in favour of a change in the rules out of order and now the motion will not be even discussed at Congress.
Read more at www.eleven-a-side.com
The SFAI are the governing body for grassroots football in Ireland, not the FAI. Its success or the lack of is all down to them.
Here we go again with the Nazi-bashing.I'm not a fan of them, but I wish people would use the term Nazi in its proper context.
IMO, the use of Croke Park is the GAA's decision, and I'm happy with it either way. They see soccer as a competitor, and are afraid of losing players to it. They shouldn't be forced by anyone to promote it.
Neither should the taxpayer foot the bill for Croke Park's redevopment. Neither should football clubs in Britain or Europe lend their facilities to the sport. Neither should councils in Britain who adhere to any anti-discrimination legislation (all of them IMO) do either. F*cking bigots!Originally posted by brendy_eire
IMO, the use of Croke Park is the GAA's decision, and I'm happy with it either way. They see soccer as a competitor, and are afraid of losing players to it. They shouldn't be forced by anyone to promote it.
This is the cooooooooooooolest footy forum I've ever seen!
Calm down mucker hi. The government has a duty to promote our national games. They're part of our heritage and an integral part of our culture. It is entirely right for the government to pay for the redevelopment of Croke Park. The GAA are charged by the government with running the association games and promoting them as they see fit. If they see it fit not to open Croke Park to competing sports, fair enough.Originally posted by lopez
Neither should the taxpayer foot the bill for Croke Park's redevopment. Neither should football clubs in Britain or Europe lend their facilities to the sport. Neither should councils in Britain who adhere to any anti-discrimination legislation (all of them IMO) do either. F*cking bigots!
OK brendy: The nurse has given me my medication. Thing is in the real world there is a lot of cooperation between sporting bodies. There's much money to be made. It's time the GAA came into it.Originally posted by brendy_eire
Calm down mucker hi. The government has a duty to promote our national games. They're part of our heritage and an integral part of our culture. It is entirely right for the government to pay for the redevelopment of Croke Park. The GAA are charged by the government with running the association games and promoting them as they see fit. If they see it fit not to open Croke Park to competing sports, fair enough.
Imagine the 1994 World Cup without the aid of the American sporting bodies (OK many stadiums owned by feckless corporations but you take my point). The GAA should have nothing to fear from sharing their grounds and everything to gain (especially financially). This ban is based on bigotry, although I agree the term Nazi is too easily thrown around. Time I went to bed.
This is the cooooooooooooolest footy forum I've ever seen!
I know, I know they were terribly misunderstood.Originally posted by brendy_eire
Here we go again with the Nazi-bashing.
Originally posted by brendy_eire
They're part of our heritage and an integral part of our culture.
So is football! Anyway the GAA only represents as it claims themselves Gaels (whoever they were
i dont want football played in Croke Park. Let the apartheid era organistaion do whatever they want.
Are all those Presbyterians in Ulster with Scots Gaelic surnames beginning with "Mc", Gaels?Originally posted by eoinh
So is football! Anyway the GAA only represents as it claims themselves Gaels (whoever they were
Last edited by Paddy Ramone; 10/03/2004 at 8:03 AM.
I can't say I enjoy GAA bashing, but they've always struck me as an odd cabal. While claiming to stand for the protection of 'our sporting heritage' it has demoted what is one of the fastest, skillful and pleasing to watch game, an 'indigenous' game with a long history, in favour of a hybrid between soccer and rugby which even the GAA's hagiographer Marcus De Burca admits is synthetic, being devised after both rugby and football were both codified (indeed wasn't Michael Cusack originally a great follower of rugby?) and is doubtful anything like football played previously in Ireland.
Also this rule 21 was another own goal IMO. OK, policemen and chuckies in the same club are hardly conducive to the war of independence, but surely isn't this the case in any other part of society: eg: a soccer club? And as far as infilitration goes, the British seemed to be successful getting into the Ra, without sending in an overt policeman at a GAA club. Sean O'Callagahan? Snakebite (or whatever he was called)? The bloke that was taken for a bath? All this rule did (as did rule 27 (the ban) and rule 42 continues to do) was to underline that this association was more than just a sporting one, but a political one with a pillar of discrimination, whose only notable success was to prevent that boring sport, cricket, grabbing a foothold in Ireland.
This is the cooooooooooooolest footy forum I've ever seen!
I actually know someone who was a member of this 'GAA' thing, apparently they are actually all Nazis
Dav, in this part of the world, it's an excuse for a siesta. As for Lahore, well put in a fart lighting match between India and Pakistan, and it would kick off.Originally posted by davros
Who are you;Hair Bear?!
Turn up in Lahore this week....don't think you'd call the sport boring then.......
Steady on! Do they walk around in brown shirts whistling the Horst Wessel Song? No nazis would allow a half - Fijian (Sean Og whatshisname) to taint any sport fo theirs. Come on, there's plenty of ammunition out there without bringing out the NSDAP.Originally posted by wws
I actually know someone who was a member of this 'GAA' thing, apparently they are actually all Nazis
This is the cooooooooooooolest footy forum I've ever seen!
It seems fairly fascist to me that a small body within an organisation can arbitrarily rule perfecly good motions (I have it on very good authority) out of order just because they don't like the fact that most of the organisation wants to pass them.Originally posted by lopez
Steady on! Do they walk around in brown shirts whistling the Horst Wessel Song? No nazis would allow a half - Fijian (Sean Og whatshisname) to taint any sport fo theirs. Come on, there's plenty of ammunition out there without bringing out the NSDAP.
Words like totalitarian are being bandied about in the papers, and not without justification.
You can't spell failure without FAI
Very unfair. Even the Nazis used to play sport against other people.
EL grounds are like good episodes of The Simpsons, no matter how many times you see them they're still funny
"Soccer" just as much a "foreign" game to the Germans as the Irish was never banned in Nazi Germany. The GAA even make the Nazis look like lily-livered liberals.
There was a game called Caid played in Kerry and Cork which was forerunner to Gaelic and rugby in those areas. It's not as ancient as Hurling of course.Originally posted by lopez
in favour of a hybrid between soccer and rugby which even the GAA's hagiographer Marcus De Burca admits is synthetic, being devised after both rugby and football were both codified (indeed wasn't Michael Cusack originally a great follower of rugby?) and is doubtful anything like football played previously in Ireland.
And in some Irish speakers in Kerry refer to a ball as 'caid', most of the rest of the country uses 'liathróid'. The term is also used to refer to a game of Gaelic football.Originally posted by Paddy Ramone
There was a game called Caid played in Kerry and Cork which was forerunner to Gaelic and rugby in those areas. It's not as ancient as Hurling of course.
Munster 33-6 Gloucester
Aint revenge sweet?!
Apparently it was much more similar to rugby than Gaelic, the first attempt to codify the rules was at Jesuit Schools (Clongowes Wood and Belvedere) and this produced a code called ''Jesuit Rules'' this was so similar to Rugby they dropped it when IRFU started up. Also the reason Castleisland is a bit of a rugby stronghold (well relatively)Originally posted by Shed End John
And in some Irish speakers in Kerry refer to a ball as 'caid', most of the rest of the country uses 'liathróid'. The term is also used to refer to a game of Gaelic football.
EL grounds are like good episodes of The Simpsons, no matter how many times you see them they're still funny
I'll say!! The great Mick 'Gaillimh' Galwey hails from Castleisland. Absolute legend he is!Originally posted by TommyT
. Also the reason Castleisland is a bit of a rugby stronghold (well relatively)
Munster 33-6 Gloucester
Aint revenge sweet?!
......as do Moss Keane and Mick Doyle.
William Webb Ellis got the idea for his game while visiting the cousins in the auld country, to be sure, to be sure.Originally posted by TommyT
Apparently it was much more similar to rugby than Gaelic, the first attempt to codify the rules was at Jesuit Schools (Clongowes Wood and Belvedere) and this produced a code called ''Jesuit Rules'' this was so similar to Rugby they dropped it when IRFU started up. Also the reason Castleisland is a bit of a rugby stronghold (well relatively)
This is the cooooooooooooolest footy forum I've ever seen!
Posting Permissions
Quote
Bookmarks