Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 29 of 39 FirstFirst ... 192728293031 ... LastLast
Results 561 to 580 of 768

Thread: France V Ireland - Wednesday, 18th November 2009 - World Cup 2010 Playoff Second Leg

  1. #561
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    92
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    Every bloody game would be challenged in the courts.
    http://www.goal.com/en-india/news/13...on-package-for

  2. #562
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    39,706
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,007
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,249
    Thanked in
    3,487 Posts
    Nothing to do with this case again. That was an ineligible player/illegal contract scenario. This is a ref making a mistake, which is covered under the rules of the game.

  3. #563
    Reserves
    Joined
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    462
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    14
    Thanked in
    10 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    And do you know what - it's happened before, and will happen again. Zola Budd for example? That race wasn't re-run.
    Are you French?

    Whose side are you on here?

    If FIFA said in the morning they were replaying the game I have a feeling you would lobby them not to have it played.

    I repeat Ireland were denied a sporting chance. From what I remember of Zola Budd the athlete who tripped her was disqualified.

    Still think there shouldn't be a replay?

  4. #564
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    92
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    Nothing to do with this case again. That was an ineligible player/illegal contract scenario. This is a ref making a mistake, which is covered under the rules of the game.
    Its a court case in relation to cheating.

  5. #565
    New Signing
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Toulouse, France
    Posts
    2
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    I would find more honest to replay this match.
    A French supporter.

  6. #566
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    92
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Remember when Arsenal agreed to replay with Sheff United ?

    http://www.arseweb.com/98-99/reports/130299.html

  7. #567
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    39,706
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,007
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,249
    Thanked in
    3,487 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by markmc View Post
    Its a court case in relation to cheating.
    No, in relation to illegal contracts. The rules of the game are quite clear in relation to last night's incident.

    Quote Originally Posted by Emmet7 View Post
    Are you French?

    Whose side are you on here?

    If FIFA said in the morning they were replaying the game I have a feeling you would lobby them not to have it played.

    Sorry for being right.

    FFS.

  8. #568
    Reserves
    Joined
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    462
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    14
    Thanked in
    10 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    No, in relation to illegal contracts. The rules of the game are quite clear in relation to last night's incident.



    Sorry for being right.

    FFS.
    Because you say you are right doesn't make you right I'm afraid.

    You clearly don't understand the concept of someone in sport gaining an unfair advantage or in this example a clear case of a performance enhancement.

    Handling the ball gives that player that extra edge over other players. Handling the ball is not within the rules. Players have been suspended for things referees did not see, such as with Robert Huth. Should Huth have been allowed get away with that punch because the ref didn't see it?

    Your argument hasn't a leg to stand on.

  9. #569
    Reserves
    Joined
    May 2008
    Posts
    304
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    13
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    No, in relation to illegal contracts. The rules of the game are quite clear in relation to last night's incident.



    Sorry for being right.

    FFS.

    haha dont you know you have to be pig ignorant when your country is involved and forget whats corret and whats not stu, its the rules of this board

  10. #570
    Director dahamsta's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2001
    Location
    The Internet
    Posts
    14,045
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    519
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    853
    Thanked in
    521 Posts
    Emmet7, drop the "are you french" crap. Reason it out or be quiet.

    stu, although I can understand your frustration, you know well to ignore that kind of "commentary".

  11. #571
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    39,706
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,007
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,249
    Thanked in
    3,487 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Emmet7 View Post
    Players have been suspended for things referees did not see, such as with Robert Huth.
    So give Henry a one-match ban.

    Do you see the difference between that and replaying a whole match?

    Do you want to reply to any of my other previous "Do you see the difference" questions aimed at you?

  12. #572
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    92
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    No, in relation to illegal contracts. The rules of the game are quite clear in relation to last night's incident.
    The rules of the game are clear in relation to deliberate handball.

  13. #573
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    39,706
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,007
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,249
    Thanked in
    3,487 Posts
    And they're clear in relation to referee errors.

  14. #574
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    92
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu View Post
    And they're clear in relation to referee errors.
    It not really a referee error, the ref could not have seen it. It was a very deliberate handball and done in a way that nobody could see it.

    The FFF should be offering to replay the game, simple as that.

  15. #575
    First Team Metrostars's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,534
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    33
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    79
    Thanked in
    52 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by markmc View Post
    It not really a referee error, the ref could not have seen it. It was a very deliberate handball and done in a way that nobody could see it.

    The FFF should be offering to replay the game, simple as that.
    I'm not sure what the ref saw. After all he did motion to Shay that the ball hit Henry's side. If that's the case, he is lying. He did not motion to Shay that he did not see it.

    And even if he didn't see it, why wasn't the two offsides called? Or the fact that Squalachi pulled Dunne's shirt?
    Last edited by Metrostars; 19/11/2009 at 4:36 PM.
    "Jacques Santini...will be greeted in every dugout of the country by "one-nil, one-nil" - Clive Tyldsley, 89th minute of France-England June 13, 2004.
    "Ooooohhhh Nooooooo" Bobby Robson 91st minute.

  16. #576
    First Team
    Joined
    May 2008
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    2,100
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    165
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    519
    Thanked in
    386 Posts
    The whole Henry affair is getting totally out of hand. Ireland should have had the game wrapped up in full time if Doyle, Duff or Keane took one their gilt-edged chances. They only have themselves to blame, same old hard luck story from the brave Irish. Fair enough Henry clearly handled the ball twice. The referee and assistants missed it. But these things happen in football, just have to roll with the punches, referees make mistakes. Perhaps it's karma with Ireland getting out of jail on a couple of occasions during the qualifying campaign with generous refereeing decisions (eg Jouni Hyytia awarding Ireland a penalty for a "dubious at best" handball against Georgia). How many Irish were crying foul then?! The FAI and Dermot Ahern (trying to score some cheap political points) are making asses of themselves. It is a good argument for video tech or to follow the Europa League example who have an extra assistant behind the goal to prevent it happening again. But nothing more will come of this affair. Its time to just accept it even though it's a bitter pill to swallow. These things happen in football, let sleeping dogs lie.

  17. #577
    Viva El Presidente! sligoman's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Town
    Posts
    19,975
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    595
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    383
    Thanked in
    224 Posts
    Just heard on RTE there that Cowen has asked FIFA for a replay and he's going to bring it up with Sarkozy at an upcoming summit. What an idiot.
    Life without Rovers, it makes no sense...it's a heartache...nothing but a fools game. S.R.F.C.


  18. #578
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    92
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sligoman View Post
    Just heard on RTE there that Cowen has asked FIFA for a replay and he's going to bring it up with Sarkozy at an upcoming summit. What an idiot.
    Shame Cowen cant get worked up about sorting out dodgy bankers and property developers.

  19. #579
    International Prospect tricky_colour's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Nottingham.
    Posts
    8,886
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,682
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    898
    Thanked in
    621 Posts
    It just brings the game into disrepute when a team qualifys through blatent cheating, the FIFA should not let it happen, nor should the French team, it makes a mockery of the competition, and it makes the trophy worthless.

  20. #580
    Director dahamsta's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2001
    Location
    The Internet
    Posts
    14,045
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    519
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    853
    Thanked in
    521 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sligoman View Post
    Just heard on RTE there that Cowen has asked FIFA for a replay and he's going to bring it up with Sarkozy at an upcoming summit. What an idiot.
    He'll probably offer him a pig as a bribe.

Page 29 of 39 FirstFirst ... 192728293031 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 54
    Last Post: 13/09/2016, 8:07 AM
  2. Italy V Republic of Ireland - Wednesday, 1st April 2009 - World Cup 2010 Q
    By Noelys Guitar in forum Archived Match Threads
    Replies: 463
    Last Post: 13/09/2016, 8:01 AM
  3. Replies: 766
    Last Post: 12/09/2016, 2:42 PM
  4. Replies: 53
    Last Post: 12/09/2016, 2:42 PM
  5. Replies: 462
    Last Post: 12/09/2016, 2:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •