That article was written in the context of how we like to perceive ourselves on the world stage i.e. worlds greatest fans, everyone loves the Irish etc.
His point was that the world cup would manage just fine without us and by the time it came around Thierry Henrys handball would be a distant memory as far as the rest of the football world was concerned.
He didn't mean WE wouldn't care.
I'm a bloke,I'm an ocker
And I really love your knockers,I'm a labourer by day,
I **** up all me pay,Watching footy on TV,
Just feed me more VB,Just pour my beer,And get my smokes, And go away
True enough.
In fairness I phrased it badly but what I meant was the rugby fans viewed the IRFU as being 'shackled' to the FAI.
Now that doesn't make it true necessarily but it is a view that is quite widely held in my experience.
Most of the rugger heads I know would be south dublin based so they are the hardcore Ross O'Carroll-Kelly types in fairness.
Rugger heads are no more representative of the general rugby population as we are of the general barstooling population. The IRFU and FAI have a very good relationship that benefits both sides and sport on the island in general and long may it continue, no matter how upset it makes people on message boards.
That Munster Leinster game was on TG4.
300k sounds a lot, considering the question - just how many Rugby fans would have been able to find this station on their tv?
Any idea what a Man United game would have got this time last year?
Looking at these tables, Man U v Bayern & v Barca attracted fewer viewers than an Ireland friendly.
Viewing figures
Rugby fans have more money and there's less games which helps its profile.
There are 13-14 rugby internationals a year...
They have 4 friendlies in a row coming up, maybe the IRFU are more desperate for funds.
What was usual in a season, 2 or 3 Six nations and 2 or 3 profile friendlies any time Australia/NZ /SA and now Argentina, would visit. In a WC year, you get a few more friendlies.
6 nations means 5 games Geysir!
I think the autumn internationals have always been 3 games, no?
WC year maybe means 4.
You can't mean both "the sport in general" and "at home," unless you consider English Premier League matches to be "home"
I kinda assumed that ArdeeBhoy's reference to Rugby supporters - having more money and fewer games to attend, was in regards to home intl. games.
I wasn't paying attention to the context. My error.
Bookmarks