ORA, do you (as the setter of the poll) get to see which option people voted for?
I work in the private sector and I have taken a paycut since the start of 2008 or been made redundant
I work in the private sector and my pay has increased or stayed the same since the start of 2008
The main economic bodies, both Irish and internationally and the private sector see the obvious solution to the country's spending deficit as a fairly significant pay cut across the public sector.
Obviously the public sector have come out against this and feel they will be sharing an undue burden of the economic pain. They have specifically denied that paycuts in the private sector have been widespread.
So, I thought a simple poll would be informative.
Only to be answered by those in the private sector. Simply, since the beginning of 2008, have you either taken a gross pay cut (i.e. before tax or government intervention) or have you been made redundant (the ultimate pay cut).
OR
is your gross pay the same, or more, than at the start of 2009.
The poll is private BTW.
Last edited by OneRedArmy; 14/10/2009 at 10:26 AM.
ORA, do you (as the setter of the poll) get to see which option people voted for?
No, it's a private poll.
I think its missing the point a bit.
If a private sector firm was spending way more than it was taking in then cuts would happen. Isnt that the case with the government? Expenditure way exceeds income.
I am in the private sector and do not know of anyone taking a pay cut.
I do know a lot of people who have been made redundant.
Also if your on minimum wage then you cant get a pay cut.
The ERSI issed a report about 10 days ago stating that private sector wages have increased this year, although the data was about 7 months out of date.
If you can get public sector wages cut on the basis of a myth on private sector wages, then you can piggyback on those public sector cuts to reduce private sector wages. Unfortunately, much of the population has fallen for it.
Right wing organisations and Groups with an agenda such as the ERSI and IBEC are not finding the evidence of these pay cuts, so I'm not sure what this will add to it.
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
In HP all permanent employees were asked to take a 5% wage reduction. As far as I'm aware most refused though. It remains to be seen what the next move will be- probably some more layoffs.
Contractors in our group have all had to take some unpaid leave- only 1/2 a day for each of three months though.
In the States they simply tell the employees how its going to be and they get no choice or say in the matter.
#NeverStopNotGivingUp
" I wish to God that someone would be able to block out the voices in my head for five minutes, the voices that scream, over and over again: "Why do they come to me to die?"
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
There's two arguments for wage cuts in the public sector:
1) the public sector is better paid in comparison with the private sector. This comparison is difficult to make definitively as its difficult to put a price on guaranteed pensions and job security. So this can never been definitively proved without making judgement calls and relying on individual situations and anecdotes. It also changes over time making comparison even more difficult.
2) there is a structural public sector deficit that requires spending to be reduced to avoid fiscal meltdown, and as wages are the biggest expenditure, then they need to fall.
We could argue 1) until the cows come home but 2) is hard to argue IMO.
What if the gross pay is the same but the perks are down the beers after work and expenses etc. being checked more these days.
63.00
The only bodies that have ever done a like for like comparison are the Benchmarking bodies. Average pay comparisons aren't valid, even the ERSI admit so (but then do another flawed comparison that doesn't compare actual jobs).
The overall wage bill - there's more than one way to skin that cat that needn't mean wage cuts.
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
No private sector , they still fiddle the expenses and mileage in the public sector its considered one of the perks of the job along with sick pay. It seems that all ancillairy spending on staff is chopped in the private sector have yet to hear of anyone having the traditional paid for lavish Xmas party with the free cabs home this year.
63.00
Bit harsh there Macy. I know very few people, in either sector, that don't fiddle their expenses on some level. It's a sad fact of life, people take advantage if they think they'll get away with it. Usually they do, because the Irish tend to turn a blind eye to it. If they didn't, Bertie wouldn't have become Taoiseach, never mind lasted as long as he did. Sadly, it's our nature. (And it seems to be human nature, we just excel at it.)
In our place, mileage is checked using routeplanner (or similar). You may get away with a mile here or there, but it wouldn't be open to widespread abuse. Subsistence is at set rates.
To be honest, it's more the sick days thing that bugs me. An O'Leary myth that people have picked up on, run with, and it's now accepted as fact.
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
I have been told on a number of occasions, by people I trust, of new joiners being told by shop stewards to treat the sick day allowance as holiday and being threatened that they should use them in order that the "benefit" isn't removed.
IIRC sick days are published and whilst not all areas of the public sector have a problem, some have outlandish figures. The unions try to claim that the figures are inflated by a small number of long-term sick leave outliers but this is simply a smokescreen.
Bookmarks