Tells it's own story about Limerick. It was still a larger attendence then Munster were averaging in the Heneiken cup around 10 years ago.Originally Posted by an_ceannaire
11,300 tells it own story.....there will be 20,000 + there on Friday night for a Magners League game, not a henieken cup game, a magners league game........
Don't think Keogh was a bad as some are saying, thought he tracked back well to help out the full back and got some good tackles and blocks in.
Subs were the big plus, Best did well as did O'Dea, Lawrence grew into it after the goal, was quiet until then. Worth remembering that we were down to 10 men for a quarter of the first half which was when they had an awful lot of their possesion.
Happy enough to get a win and build some momentum, roll on next month and fingers crossed for a draw later tonight.
There was well over 11300 at this game . I was at both games and the crowd was slightly less than the game v Aus ( I think the attendance was 20k+ for that ). I would estimate there was about 18k in attendance when making comparisons.11,300 tells it own story.....
Might have to do with all the free tickets that were floating about.
Last edited by First; 09/09/2009 at 9:17 AM.
I'll update this next year.
it was 11,300 according to football365. There was no announcement at the game, and no confirmation on fai.ie
just like to to add that for the 5-10 minutes that Folan was off the pitch getting treatment, Ireland played with 10 men for the first time under Trapattoni. We settled into 2 banks of four, one in the penalty area, the next just inside the centre circle, with Doyle staying around the centre circle chasing the opposition defenders. South Africa had the majority of possession for this few minutes, but couldn't work the ball into a scoring position. This was obviously something that had been worked on in training and was pretty heartening to see
Spot on, you have to consider the mess we were in when Trap took over and the players we have at our disposal. We have a system finally, it takes time for the players to learn how the system operates and its even harder when you are under pressure to qualify.
The emphasis is to focus on how to not lose the game first, how the team can prevent the opposition from scoring/creating chances. Once the players have this down it becomes instinctive and they can start to exploit the attacking opportunities, knowing when to attack as a team.
It's a difficult process for the fans as the football is hard to watch, but it should be a lot easier to take when you are getting results....
Last edited by Oink; 09/09/2009 at 9:16 AM.
lads how does lawerence qualify for us ?? whats his connection ?
He's Irish.
"Can I have a Kit-Kat, chunky?"
"you mean a big one"
"No a normal kit-kat you fat bitch"
I just saw the replay from behind the ball (where it wasn't that apparent that the SA guy was charging the ball) where as soon as the ball was kicked Gibson was clearly annoyed.
Pat-anaccio?
Is that enough??
Liking that
I can’t believe this…I agree with Weldoninhio !!
Also, I’m astonished that no matter how obvious it is that our midfield are being destroyed that Trap still does not change. Quite obvious to any opposition that simply deploying a 4-5-1 against us will beat us!
I actually thought it was quite funny watching us without the ball. We were like a table football team, 4 across the bcak all in a line, 4 across the middle, all in a line and 2 upfront.
Boring as hell, but it works. Only two dreadful errors against Bulgaria mean that we haven't already nailed second.
Keep it tight, score from set pieces. Very Mourinho-esque, just without the star personnel.
I think criticism of the full backs' distribution is harsh. They really didn't have the options. They defended well which was the main thing.
I agree with eirebhoy's assessment. I think Italy away shows that there is another way we can play, but I think Trap thinks if it ain't broke don't fix it.
Funny thing is, if we get to SA I think it'll be like a mini-version of our qualifying group: one star team, one that we could compete well enough against and one team that is probably ranked well below us, maybe a NZ or someone like that. I don't think it's accurate to say that just because it's a WC that the opposition is necessarily all superior. Once you get to the last 16 then it changes.
Thought the 2nd half was a big improvement last night. Lawrence looks a good player but then he always impressed me for Stoke anyway, unlike Whelan. I'd seen very little of Best but he looks a good option, not afraid to have a go anyway. Folan hasn't let us down yet either, great attitude. He may have to leave Hull at this stage though as I can't see him getting too many games with Vennegor there now. Gibson needs a kick up the hole at this stage. Tactics or no tactics the guy offers no outlet whatsoever, even in comparison to Whelan or Andrews. He's in the squad ahead of a lot of other guys and it's not on merit, so he'd want to acklowledge that he's living the dream a bit and make an effort.
Yeah, I agree with the Gibson assessment, despite Trap’s assertion that he had a great game. By all means be disciplined and follow instructions without the ball, but that doesn’t mean you can’t show the courage & responsibility to take the ball.
It was quite telling for me that the biggest critics of the midfielders’ performance in last 2 games were Giles, Souness, Houghton & Whelan, all players who demanded the ball and used it smartly. I don’t recall them being critical of the system (I could be wrong) just that they wanted more positive involvement from the CMs.
I see no contradiction between having excellent discipline without the ball and wanting to use the ball properly when we have it. Maybe Trap just doesn’t think they have it and that it’s better to lose the ball up the pitch rather than nearer our box.
I think we looked very tight, they were moaning on the TV (Here in SA) that they weren't able to get behind us, except the one run from the left full at the end of the first half when he should have pulled it back.
What I liked especially from Lawrence was that when the ball came down his side he dropped into effectively the right full position with Kelly shuffling towards the centre to pick up a runner or a through ball, didn't notice it as much on the left but Keogh is a natural to that position.
Jack Charlton also placed major importance on not losing and then seeing if we could manufacture a win.
Maybe these two old geezers(Trap and Charlton) appreciated that this is the best way for us to approach international football. Afterall we are not Holland or Brazil.
Would it be an outrageous idea to play such a game for 20 minutes or so with 10 men?
Like Tets said, it was interesting to see how we adapted.
I was only watching a stream of the game but I really can't see where the heavy criticism of Keogh is coming from. No way should be start a competitive game on the wing but at a minimum it was useful experience for him and for us.
Right now I wouldn't be at all fearful if Lawrence was started at RM. Not saying he should but he would have been capable of playing there against Italy away.
I love how as the months tick on the critics have gone from saying we'd be destroyed by Italy and Bulgaria, to still not qualifying, to now it's getting to the stage of "sure we'll be hammered in South Africa anyway".
Lets say we had the exact same group as WC2002, Germany would be a similar situation to our games against Italy, keep it tight, won't be the better team but could sneak a point. Against a team like Cameroon I think we could easily get a draw, maybe sneak a win (like Bulgaria) and then I'd be confident we could beat a fourth seed like Saudi Arabia.
Then again we'd never be able to beat Spain in the final so what's the point?
If Vennegor was on his game then Folan would be a regular spectator, however on last season's evidence JVOH's game was far from that.
If it's a choice between Folan and (injury prone) JVOH to play, I'd say Folan will still get plenty of game time and possibly learn a few tricks from his rival.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks