Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 33 of 33

Thread: Chelsea banned from signing players till 2011

  1. #21
    Seasoned Pro
    Joined
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    2,660
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    12
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    97
    Thanked in
    38 Posts
    It's not in clubs' interest to undermine what Blatter calls the specificity of sport, particularly not the likes of Chelsea.

    Great day for football if FIFA stick to their guns. Although they'll almost certainly reduce it to one transfer period on appeal.
    A leading authority on League of Ireland football since 2003. You're probably wrong.

  2. #22
    International Prospect Razors left peg's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Just Another Emigrant
    Posts
    5,917
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,524
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,536
    Thanked in
    1,001 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GalwayRed View Post



    Hes effectivly been fined a years wages. Probably more. That to me is harsh.
    Im sure Chelsea will pay the fine for him... they are gonna have lots of spare cash lying around anyway since they cant use it to sign any more players
    Its really not that complicated!!!

  3. #23
    Seasoned Pro old git's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Location
    cooraclare
    Posts
    3,087
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    37
    Thanked in
    34 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr A View Post
    Chelsea intend to appeal, strangely enough: http://www.chelseafc.com/page/Latest...787070,00.html

    No doubt they're guilty, but that punishment is very harsh when you consider than most big clubs are at the same thing.
    fifa have to start somewere .. and were chelsea not in trouble with them not so long back with john obi makel did he not sign for utd and then change his mind and wanted to join chelsea .. chelsea had to pay utd a few million on this if i can remember... fifa have started process now so they will have to also punish any other clubs found guilty..

    " football is a simple game "

  4. #24
    Reserves
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Castlebar
    Posts
    353
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by old git View Post
    fifa have to start somewere .. and were chelsea not in trouble with them not so long back with john obi makel did he not sign for utd and then change his mind and wanted to join chelsea .. chelsea had to pay utd a few million on this if i can remember... fifa have started process now so they will have to also punish any other clubs found guilty..
    Every top club in europe are probably guilty at one time or another.

  5. #25
    Coach tetsujin1979's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Dublin, originally from Limerick
    Posts
    23,252
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,127
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,291
    Thanked in
    3,500 Posts
    Interesting article on football365 about this. Basically makes the point that when people with the financial clout of Abramovich are running clubs, fines become irrelevant. However, this transfer embargo is something that will affect the club in a very real way.
    All goals, yellow and red cards tweeted in real time on mastodon, BlueSky and facebook

  6. #26
    Seasoned Pro shakermaker1982's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    4,400
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    149
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    318
    Thanked in
    214 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tetsujin1979 View Post
    Interesting article on football365 about this. Basically makes the point that when people with the financial clout of Abramovich are running clubs, fines become irrelevant. However, this transfer embargo is something that will affect the club in a very real way.
    Exactly. Fining a rich club like Chelsea 1 million would upset them but it doesn't have the same impact as a transfer embargo for 18 months. The docking of points is another method that would surely deter clubs from breaking FIFA rules. I hope their appeal is unsuccessful because it might mean Chelsea and the rest of the big boys treat smaller clubs with a bit more respect when it comes to stelaing their talent.

    Chelsea must have done more than just make contact with the player e.g. "we're interested are you keen?". FIFA's statement hints at something a bit more underhand.......at a guess they probably outlined a financial package when he did jump ship from the off, offered him a house for his family and maybe even a job for his folks? I'm only speculating but it will be interesting to read the proper report.

  7. #27
    Seasoned Pro old git's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Location
    cooraclare
    Posts
    3,087
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    37
    Thanked in
    34 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rava View Post
    Every top club in europe are probably guilty at one time or another.
    i agree ... just that chelsea seem to have been more active in the last few years and more clubs complained to fifia .. obi makel / cashley cole / 2 young players from leeds and even tried it with eriksson when he was manager of england !! plus i also feel uefa / fifa , platini just want any excuse to hammer english clubs..

    " football is a simple game "

  8. #28
    First Team endabob1's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Welcome to Cape Town
    Posts
    1,501
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    10
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    13
    Thanked in
    11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by old git View Post
    i agree ... just that chelsea seem to have been more active in the last few years and more clubs complained to fifia .. obi makel / cashley cole / 2 young players from leeds and even tried it with eriksson when he was manager of england !! plus i also feel uefa / fifa , platini just want any excuse to hammer english clubs..

    Plus (ironically) Frank Arnesen from Tottenham

  9. #29
    First Team L37Ultra's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Limerick
    Posts
    2,044
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    Does anyone else think this is part of Plantini's overall plan to cut down on the English's clubs domination in the Champions League? He is looking for votes for the smaller countries.
    For all the latest League of Ireland news visit www.extratime.ie

  10. #30
    Coach John83's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    8,994
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,157
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,301
    Thanked in
    812 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by L37Ultra View Post
    Does anyone else think this is part of Plantini's overall plan to cut down on the English's clubs domination in the Champions League? He is looking for votes for the smaller countries.
    It depends on how much of a pragmatist and a politician he is. Mostly, he's seemed to make huge claims like that he'd make football non-contact or restore the CL to just the national champions, but he hasn't the capital to push anything through. Maybe he's trying to build it, but he's never shown signs of that before that I've noticed.
    You can't spell failure without FAI

  11. #31
    Seasoned Pro
    Joined
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    2,660
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    12
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    97
    Thanked in
    38 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by L37Ultra View Post
    Does anyone else think this is part of Plantini's overall plan to cut down on the English's clubs domination in the Champions League? He is looking for votes for the smaller countries.
    Unlikely, considering it's a FIFA sanction...
    A leading authority on League of Ireland football since 2003. You're probably wrong.

  12. #32
    Youth Team Infadel's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Dublin City University
    Posts
    194
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

  13. #33
    Formerly: Rafa B
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,875
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    196
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    46
    Thanked in
    39 Posts
    The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) have granted Chelsea's request to suspend their transfer ban.

    Fifa ruled against Chelsea in August when they ruled the English club had induced teenager Gael Kakuta to break his contract with Lens.

    As punishment for this, the world's governing body imposed a transfer ban on Chelsea and stated they could not register new players for two transfer windows.

    This meant Chelsea would not be able to sign a new player until 2011 - but now The Blues have successfully lobbied CAS that their ban should be suspended until their full appeal against Fifa's decision is heard by the Swiss-based court.

    That now means that Chelsea will be in a position to buy players in January, if they wish.

    CAS also ruled that Gael Kakuta - who was banned from playing for four months - has also had his suspension 'stayed' making him available for selection.

    The CAS statement read: "The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has granted the request for a stay filed by Chelsea Football Club Ltd and Mr Gaël Kakuta in relation to the decision taken by the Fifa Dispute Resolution Chamber on 27 August 2009.

    "The Fifa Dispute Resolution Chamber imposed, inter alia, a restriction of four months' ineligibility on Mr Gael Kakuta, and Chelsea Football Club Ltd was banned from registering any new players, either nationally or internationally, for the next two complete, consecutive registration periods.

    "Such sanctions are now stayed until the CAS renders its final decision in

    this matter."

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Players banned by FIFA rule
    By Trainee in forum Premier & First Divisions
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 22/03/2007, 10:52 AM
  2. Signing new players
    By cobhrambler 16 in forum Cobh Ramblers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22/08/2004, 3:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •