Just to set you right on the historical basis to Derry City being in the LOI. There were no security reasons why DC could not have gone back to the IL. During the 80s, the then RUC, make it clear that Derry City could play IL football in the Brandywell. It was the powers to be in Windsor Park that used security issues to stop it. It's also not right to say that the IL couldn't have prevented DC joining the LOI. They could and indeed it was your very own Mr. Crosson, who was the then chairman of the Irish League, that allowed DC to join the LOI. This was agreed at an inter-league meeting that took place in Oriel Park, Dundalk in 1984.
Neale Fenn on retiring: 'I think once you finish you might as well finish rather than making all sorts of comebacks.'
I think the point is that if the ownership of DCFC changes then the IFA membership can't move with that transaction- presumably DCFC would have to reapply.
#NeverStopNotGivingUp
If such behaviour were to prevent a club playing in a certain location, then the likes of Rangers and Celtic would not be permitted to play in Scotland. or Linfield and Cliftonville in NI.
The fact is, DCFC were prevented from playing IL football at the Brandywell and were unwilling (naturally) to play "home" IL games elsewhere, so were permitted to enter the LOI instead.
There are no longer any extraordinary reasons which would prevent them participating in the IL like every other NI club; therefore the principle that clubs should ordinarily compete in a League within their own National Association's jurisdiction should prevail (imo).
Twenty five years experience which also (effectively) included three bankruptcies and a string of debts and unpaid creditors in their wake... Their experience in the LOI might have been happy for them, but theirs are not the only circumstances which bear considering.
In any case, DCFC were not granted their exemption on the basis that they would be happier in the LOI than the IL; rather it was because continued participation in the IL was not feasible. That latter is no longer the case.
Fair point, though whatever the merits and demerits of the Gibson case, I don't think it should have any bearing on DCFC's situation; if nothing else, Gibson was a product of Institute FC, not the Candystripes...
P.S. If the FAI have their way, I suspect the admission of "Derry City Lite" to the LOI will actually be the easiest of "slam dunks". In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see Delaney himself holding the steps steady under the basket...
I could be mistaken, but I thought I read on this forum that it was made clear by UEFA (possibly with a nod to European Law?) that the IFA could not object to DCFC playing in the LOI.
Whether or when the IFA actually did object at any stage is a separate issue, though I'm suspect they may have wanted to, if nothing else out of fear that other clubs might have tried to follow DCFC's example.
Mind you, the example of Alton United of the Falls League in Belfast in the 1920's may be instructive:
"In late 1923, the FAI was admitted to FIFA on condition that it confine its operation to the Irish Free State. Thus, the Falls League was disaffiliated. In 1924, Belfast Celtic re-entered the Irish League, and the Falls League faded"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alton_United_F.C.
Quite correct that the RUC considered that the security reasons should not prevent DCFC playing home games at the Brandywell - and you might expect them to be authoritative on that score!
However, a slim majority (I think) of the other 11 IL clubs felt that security reasons made it unsafe for them to play at the Brandywell, hence DCFC's withdrawal from the League. You may consider that majority to have been misguided, even prejudiced, but their view held sway.
(Btw, do you really mean "Windsor Park" - home of Linfield - or Windsor Avenue - home of the IFA? Either way, DCFC's withdrawal was effectively forced by the Irish League (even if the IFA chose not to override them)
Which is it then? If the IL (and IFA) really were out to "get" DCFC (hence the Brandywell ban etc), then why would they also willingly facilitate them in their desire to join the LOI?
I'm not saying you're wrong, and different individuals within the IL held differing views, but I shouldn't be at all surprised if it was the IL/IFA's inability to object which led directly to the inter-league agreement in 1984 on DCFC joining the LOI.
No offence EalingGreen, and reading about Alton United is interesting, but there's no source for that quote on wikipedia. And as the IFA was not a FIFA member at that time I'd question if the FAI's admission to FIFA was subject to this condition especially in consideration of how loosely the make-up of the international teams was regulated back then. Indeed it could be argued that FIFA did not become actively involved in the "Irish/ Northern Irish question" until the 1950s.
If I understand you right, are you saying that DCFC do not have to transfer their membership of an Association from the IFA to the FAI?
If so, then that much is true, for I'm pretty certain that any club which is located in NI has to be a Member of the IFA, whether or not they participate in an NI League. This explains why, for instance, Cardiff C and Swansea C are still both members of the FAW.
The issue in DCFC's case is twofold however (imo). Since the old DCFC/Wellvan is no more, then its membership of the IFA must presumably also have ceased to exist.
Therefore, any new club setting up in NI, regardless of the background circumstances of its incorporation, must presumably have to apply to the IFA for membership.
Thereafter, assuming that membership was approved, they presumably would have to seek permission, either from UEFA or the IFA (or both), in order to participate in a League outside the jurisdiction of their own Association.
Whether that permission is a mere formality, or would have to be substantively justified, I'm not sure. In principle, however, I feel it ought to be the latter.
Back in the real world, it is clear, as stated above, that the biggest issue is the IL creditors.
Whilst the IFA probably has good right to object on other grounds, politically, there is no reason to. The IL has been happy with Derry not being members and the FAI has been happy to have them. Therefore, realisitically, unless there is a reason for someone to rely on the law to object, then there is no reason to open what would be a huge political can of worms.
However, the 3 IL clubs being creditors is a very good reason to object (I'm assuming C'Ville have a legal agreement that we would pay a portion of Celtics cost, otherwise its two IL creditors). Some way has to be found to make good this debt, otherwise the IFA is almost duty bound to object to NewCo joining the FAI, on behalf of its out of pocket members.
Solve that, and the other problems solve themselves IMO.
Not that that will stop Ealing Green constructing and destructing numerous arguments to the contrary. All on his own.
that is correct. a club MUST be a member of the appropriate fa for it's physical location.
that club CAN play in a different fa's jurisdiction, but only with permission (ultimately sanctioned by uefa?) though they will ALWAYS remain as a member of the fa governing their physical location.
and now to the big questions......are derry city a new club? as what you state above about application and re-application would seem correct if they are.
also, derry city no longer are a member of an fai league structure due to their expulsion. isn't that correct? wouldn't any attempt at re-application to the loi require a re-application for their permission to play outside their own fa jurisdiction?
Larne FC for Larne Town. Inver Park for the people.
have to say i have the opposite view.
there is no genuine reason why derry city (new entity or ongoing entity) need to be in the loi anymore.
the political views or wishes of any club's fans are irrelevant to the need or lack of need for a club to play in a different jurisdiction.
Larne FC for Larne Town. Inver Park for the people.
1) There's obviously a genuine reason to you that they should be in the IL, otherwise you wouldn't have made the point. Laws don't make themselves and people don't hide behind them for no reason.
2) By politics, I meant football politics, not the political beliefs of our fans.
I meant anyone who wants to prohibit a Derry City team re-joining the IL.
You are hiding behind the law in my view if your only justification for your position is "because thats the law".
Derry fans have given reasons why they don't agree with the law, but nobody has actually presented a positive reason why Derry City should go into the IL, other than "because the law says so".
Ergo bad law, apply for an exemption.
because i'd like to see derry city back in the irish league. even though i support the club that replaced them, i'd still rather they never felt they had to leave. they are a club in northern ireland and should be playing alongside the rest of the clubs from northern ireland. i just don't like the halfway house situation derry city have been in since 84/5. it seems messy to me.
an il with derry city in it would be improved, to a degree. it's another "bigger" club who might at some stage help break the stranglehold the big 2 have on the competitions and make things a bit interesting and since northern ireland is quite a small place we can't afford not to have a team with the size of derry city's fanbase waltzing off elsewhere without a genuinely strong reason. that's the very simple answer. the reasons may have been strong in the past, but i can't see how they are nowdays.
ps. are you sure that's what you meant to say?! and if so, did you mean in the present or in the past?
Last edited by -lamb-; 13/11/2009 at 12:44 PM.
Larne FC for Larne Town. Inver Park for the people.
Bookmarks