I'd guess that if cash payments were being made to players, the Directors were persuading (deluding?) themselves that it was justified from the on-field success etc which would follow
From there, it is a small step to concluding that if the players deserve it for their efforts on the field, then we deserve it for our "efforts" (guarantees etc).
In which case, the loss of those guarantees should be the minimum sanction applied (imo).
And let's not impugn other posters for claims they have never actually made.
Or for not "knowing football", for that matter...
Bookmarks