I’ll take you at your word SkStu, but if you are anticipating an unqualified defence of the Dundalk board here, I think you might be disappointed!
Gerry Mathews, the Dundalk CEO. has been a strong advocate of the club not having an end-of-season deficit. Part of the “checks and balances” system that he has installed has been the requirement that he and another director sign off on each individual player contract, and therefore each of the July signings was approved by the board.
The players signed during the transfer window were mostly replacements for players off-loaded previously (O’Callaghan, Singh, Rogers, O’Brien, and Sinott) – with little change in the original wage budget. The belief was that these signings were a necessity in order to maintain a competitive squad of circa 17-18 players.
Significantly, there are a number of events which have adversely affected Dundalk’s financial situation since the transfer window opened
Postponement of Barcelona and Celtic friendly matches,
Lower then anticipated gate for Atletico match.
Dave Rogers award
Elimination from FAI Cup
In my view, most of these factors could and should have been considered in the context of new player contracts during the transfer window, and the existing players should have been consulted about the possibility of wage cuts, prior to making these signings. Additionally it is wrong to offer contracts to new players without reference to possible pay cuts.
That said, it is not unreasonable to ask staff to take voluntary pay cuts where the employer is facing a financial deficit, and it is to the players credit if they have agreed to play their part in cutting costs.
The clubs statement due later today should provide further clarification
Bookmarks