Of course I´m being arrogant, you dish it out by the jcb load , you should be man enough to take a little whiff of sarcasmI could agree with your post even if it does emit a fair whiff of arrogance if it weren't for a couple of fundamental flaws to your logic:
1. Lawrence has never had a good long chance in the team. How is one friendly game against Nigeria a good long chance? In any case he wasn't crap just fairly average which I would argue is still a step up from his competition.
2. McGeady and Hunt on the other hand have certainly had a good long chance to impress for Ireland and have never managed to do so. McGeady in particular has been dire from day one yet still he seems to be an automatic starter.
And finally what sort of drugs are the people taking that claim it would be foolish to bring in somebody untested at International level (though not at club level) because they possibly could make a mistake to replace someone like Kilbane and McGeady who in fairness have lots of international experience but are guaranteed to be rubbish and make mistakes. I could see the point if you were replacing average players who do their job with untested ones.
Please read these posts before submitting them and try to make sense of such statements.![]()
Lawrence was tested at international level like Foley, and found seriously wanting.
Means it would be a stupid managerial risk to use a player in a crucial game who has had the chance to impress and who played much worse than what you have got.
Likewise it would be stupid to replace the faltering Kilbane with Foley, i.e.suddenly throwing in Foley ahead of players who have shown much more promise when tested like Nolan and the more experienced Kelly (when match fit).
Bookmarks