Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 81 of 98 FirstFirst ... 3171798081828391 ... LastLast
Results 1,601 to 1,620 of 1952

Thread: FAI Junior Cup 2009/10

  1. #1601
    Reserves
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Location
    sligo
    Posts
    721
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    32
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    40
    Thanked in
    23 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Longshanks View Post
    lads, didnt Westport lose a semi a fews years back but got the game replayed as the winners had played an ineligible player, they won the replay and went of to lift the cup. point being that if there is a bit of skullduggery or cute whoreism going on y'd better have all the i's dotted and t's crossed cos at this stage of the competition its not just on the pitch that games are won and lost. Now I'm not trying to stir but wasnt it a Limerick team who Westport found out, correct me if I'm wrong
    hate to be quoting meself, but......deja vu???
    'I can live with disappointment, its the hope I cant handle'

  2. #1602
    Banned serpico's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    O connell st
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    There's a awful lot of thanking goin on when people are not aware of the facts.why not just wait and see until the truth comes there will be an awful lot of people very surprised indeed

  3. #1603
    Reserves
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Location
    sligo
    Posts
    721
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    32
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    40
    Thanked in
    23 Posts
    Sure while I'm quoting meself.................'You'd have to wonder about the integrity of Junior football when you read these threads. Play suspended/ineligible players and if you get away with it well and good, if you dont its one of your rival clubs who 'ratted' you out and in that case its the 'ratting' thats worse than the cheating.'

    Just as you sow you shall reap
    'I can live with disappointment, its the hope I cant handle'

  4. Thanks From:


  5. #1604
    First Team leather's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2005
    Location
    WORK
    Posts
    1,564
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    38
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    19
    Thanked in
    15 Posts
    serpico... what is the truth??? had a club in the St micks v Pike match an illegal player???(honest mistake or not) Was the objection that was then lodged also illegal????
    2 simple questions.... if the answer to the second question is yes then the matter should be closed, winners advance.. if the answer to the second question is no and the answer to the first question is yes, then the team with the illegal player should be expelled...very simple....
    not trying to pick on any club, just trying to have a conversation on the integrity of the competition..
    Last edited by leather; 26/03/2010 at 10:24 AM. Reason: addition
    sick of narcissists.....

  6. Thanks From:


  7. #1605
    Banned serpico's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    O connell st
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by leather View Post
    serpico... what is the truth??? had a club in the St micks v Pike match an illegal player???(honest mistake or not) Was the objection that was then lodged also illegal????
    2 simple questions.... if the answer to the second question is yes then the matter should be closed, winners advance.. if the answer to the second question is no and the answer to the first question is yes, then the team with the illegal player should be expelled...very simple....
    not trying to pick on any club, just trying to have a conversation on the integrity of the competition..
    As I've said in previous posts let's just wait until the final outcome and I'm sure people will find out exactly what happened instead of all this hearsay.

  8. #1606
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    Location
    A house
    Posts
    59
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    4 Posts
    You mention hearsay, Serpico - that's a little ironic given that the Pike committee did not represent themselves at the Junior Council hearing but sent the LDMC in their stead. Maybe Micheal's should have sent TSDL officials to represent them?

  9. #1607
    Banned faces's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2008
    Location
    county limerick
    Posts
    539
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    28
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by leather View Post
    serpico... What is the truth??? Had a club in the st micks v pike match an illegal player???(honest mistake or not) was the objection that was then lodged also illegal????
    2 simple questions.... If the answer to the second question is yes then the matter should be closed, winners advance.. If the answer to the second question is no and the answer to the first question is yes, then the team with the illegal player should be expelled...very simple....
    Not trying to pick on any club, just trying to have a conversation on the integrity of the competition..
    to be honest leather no matter what people think or say this matter is strictly between pike,st micks and the fai and no one else needs to know the ins and outs only these parties.people are coming on here guessing and trying to find out whats going on when in fairness its a serious situation for both sides not to be discussing it on this forum.i know everyone has ther own views on it but as serpico said lets wait for the final outcome which could take awhile.

  10. #1608
    First Team leather's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2005
    Location
    WORK
    Posts
    1,564
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    38
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    19
    Thanked in
    15 Posts
    the truth and outcome in this matter is of great importance to all clubs that enter the FAI junior cup....if either one of the clubs or the fai are seen to be subverting , twisting or just disregarding the rules of the competition, then what is the point in having the competition in the first place.....
    sick of narcissists.....

  11. Thanks From:


  12. #1609
    Banned the bandit's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    110
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leather View Post
    the truth and outcome in this matter is of great importance to all clubs that enter the FAI junior cup....if either one of the clubs or the fai are seen to be subverting , twisting or just disregarding the rules of the competition, then what is the point in having the competition in the first place.....
    Leather it is none of your or your clubs business what is going on between pike and st michaels.write to the fai if you want to know what is goin on and see what they will tell you.

  13. #1610
    Youth Team
    Joined
    May 2008
    Posts
    164
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by leather View Post
    the truth and outcome in this matter is of great importance to all clubs that enter the FAI junior cup....if either one of the clubs or the fai are seen to be subverting , twisting or just disregarding the rules of the competition, then what is the point in having the competition in the first place.....
    Well said. It is imperative that the integrity of the competition is upheld. It remains to be seen what bearing this latest episode will have on it.

  14. #1611
    Banned faces's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2008
    Location
    county limerick
    Posts
    539
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    28
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by the bandit View Post
    leather it is none of your or your clubs business what is going on between pike and st michaels.write to the fai if you want to know what is goin on and see what they will tell you.
    exactly my point bandit.well said.

  15. #1612
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    Location
    A house
    Posts
    59
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by redcardrory View Post
    i just checked rule 44 in the fai rule book and it looks like pike are safe and if an appeal goes in it goes to the domestics committee and it will be thrown out cos those players played in the summer season and regraded to amature satus for the begining of the winter season and they can not reg for thirty days after leaving pro-status so that means all ex loi players are free to play in this cup once regraded to amature.www.fai.ie/ policies and regulations(rule book)
    Red,

    Could you post a link to the actual rule book? I can't find it anywhere on FAI website.

  16. #1613
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    Location
    A house
    Posts
    59
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    4 Posts
    It was good to read back through this thread and see Connie had apologised for his ropey celebrations in Cooke Park (it was was the man, himself, who had posted). I think everyone accepts that people in football get over excited and impulsive when their team comes from two down to go ahead in a game. Similarly, most Saints people had no problem with Pike supporters running on to the pitch when the fourth goal went in. One issue, which was a cause for concern and will be a bigger one if a replay goes ahead, is that of Pike supporters sitting on top of the Michael's bench in Cooke Park. They were asked to move on the day and flatly refused. They were young looking fellas but by no means, kids/teens. Hopefully, common sense will prevail if a replay takes place and Pike officials will take steps to ensure this kind of nonsense does not reoccur.

  17. #1614
    Coach
    Joined
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Wicklow
    Posts
    7,252
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    490
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    339
    Thanked in
    250 Posts
    Just to reiterate lads,this objection thing is no picnic for anybody,I'm trying my best to let you talk about it but I'll suspend anybody I think is messing up your avenue for discussing it.

    There are enough sensible posts already here as proof that it can be done without getting personal about it.

  18. #1615
    Reserves mulla's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    660
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by the bandit View Post
    Leather it is none of your or your clubs business what is going on between pike and st michaels.write to the fai if you want to know what is goin on and see what they will tell you.
    well if thats the case maybe pike and st micks should set up there own thread for this,otherwise its a public forum and if leather or the man in the moon(providing he's got internet access) want to provide there opinion they are free to do so.
    On another note firstly you had pike supporters on saying they had nothing to worry about,then when the "truth" came out it was the LDMC's fault and now no one from pike is commenting until the real truth comes out,its laughable,they were found in the wrong by the FAI knowingly or unknowingly doesn't come into it.What else can there be too it Serpico??

  19. #1616
    Reserves mulla's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    660
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by are you serious View Post
    why did the ldmc represent pike so?
    I think for the good of the competition everyone needs to know the ins and outs tbh

  20. #1617
    Banned kev08's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    222
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Damo View Post
    You mention hearsay, Serpico - that's a little ironic given that the Pike committee did not represent themselves at the Junior Council hearing but sent the LDMC in their stead. Maybe Micheal's should have sent TSDL officials to represent them?
    in all fairness your wrong here pike had 3 commitee members there sec,chaiman were def two of them

  21. #1618
    Reserves mulla's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    660
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by redcardrory View Post
    you should study the findings from the fai junior councill meeting with both clubs before you comment about something you know nothing about and any one on this thead from limerick and not supporting limerick teams should hang their heads in shame
    ah ya like i said nice to see pike supporting carew a few years back too!! short memories as i said before!why should i study the findings aren't they all on here sure!! or better still you know it all so tell me, and i'd actually prefer to support a fully legal team like say regional
    Last edited by mulla; 26/03/2010 at 12:40 PM. Reason: added to post

  22. #1619
    Banned serpico's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    O connell st
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mulla View Post
    I think for the good of the competition everyone needs to know the ins and outs tbh
    And I'm sure they will given time.the two clubs are the only people that know what is goin at the moment and as I have said on numurous occasions the outcome will be known soon enough.when you haven't got the facts you can only presume which is quite understandable.as for you damo go back to your sources.

  23. #1620
    Banned daisycutter's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2009
    Location
    limerick
    Posts
    129
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leather View Post
    the truth and outcome in this matter is of great importance to all clubs that enter the FAI junior cup....if either one of the clubs or the fai are seen to be subverting , twisting or just disregarding the rules of the competition, then what is the point in having the competition in the first place.....
    leather i am sick of you bickering on,let pike,st micks get on with it will you,its none of your buisness your team are out now,another couple days and the grass will growing up in the boro and you can get on your lawnmower and worry about the things your employed to do up their........

Page 81 of 98 FirstFirst ... 3171798081828391 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. FAI Junior Cup 2009/10
    By the 12 th man in forum Junior League
    Replies: 189
    Last Post: 10/06/2010, 10:26 AM
  2. Munster Junior Cup 2009/10
    By Goals4fun in forum Junior League
    Replies: 518
    Last Post: 09/06/2010, 8:57 AM
  3. Connaught Junior Cup 2009/10
    By rava in forum Junior League
    Replies: 109
    Last Post: 17/05/2010, 11:54 AM
  4. Leinster Junior Cup 2009/10
    By sheriff2 in forum Junior League
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06/10/2009, 1:40 PM
  5. Munster Junior Cup 2009/10
    By Get a life in forum Junior League
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08/09/2009, 11:19 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •