QuoteHas to be older than 31, best days are long past.
bohs will not be renewing rutherford's contract in june and wabt rid of him before the end of january
even at 31,wouldnt be a bad signing
also bohs hope to have a full-time playing staff of just 17 for the coming season
Has to be older than 31, best days are long past.
Any condescension detected in this post is fully unintentional and is solely the perception of the reader. If I think you're an idiot, I'll tell you that. You won't need to intuit it.
17 players is enough if they are all quality players.
I assume that there will be 7 or 8 part timers on the fringes too for back up.If not then Bohs would be playing 5 a side by august.
I hardly think not offering a 31 year old winger who wasn't a regular last season is an indication that they're in more difficulty than they've already admitted to.
I thought that they were in the red by 400000 grand at the end of last season?????.
Let's get it going for this year the away support.
Bohs are 400,000 grand in debt.Whats that about 400 million?,christ and I thought leeds united were in trouble.
He's long past his best.Originally posted by thecorner
even at 31,wouldnt be a bad signing
Anyone watching Bohs in the Champions League last season could see that. He'll end up in Athlone or Dundalk or somewhere.
The fact that Bohs are not signing him up for another season wouldn't set the alarm bells off.
Have Boot Disk, will travel
I'm not surprised at this, he didn't do much for them last season. I'd say he would have gone with or without Bohs' money problems.
We're not arrogant, we're just better.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks