Dundalk increase Match Day prices

**Dodge** · 23/05/2009, 7:17 PM

Originally Posted by Ezeikial

Dodge, do you have an alter ego posting here? The 1st Dodge thinks penalty was "debatable", the 2nd Dodge says "absolutely correct decision"

Should we just disregard all your posts as being a contradiction?

I said it was "as debatable" as the other crucial decisions. Meaning he got them right

**brianw82** · 23/05/2009, 7:21 PM

Originally Posted by Ezeikial

You complain about this thread going off topic, and then you continue by speculating on the motivation behind Dave Rogers' sacking (even though there is a thread dedicated to this).

Strange!

I hadn't seen that thread when I made the reply.

**Ezeikial** · 23/05/2009, 7:31 PM

Originally Posted by Dodge

I said it was "as debatable" as the other crucial decisions. Meaning he got them right

Stop digging Dodge - it only makes the hole bigger (no pun intended)!

**Mr A** · 23/05/2009, 7:40 PM

Genius by Dundalk. Charge the punters extra on the basis that they get to see a strip show while reducing the wagebill by sacking the players who bare all. Fool proof.

**Dodge** · 23/05/2009, 7:52 PM

Originally Posted by Ezeikial

Stop digging Dodge - it only makes the hole bigger (no pun intended)!

What digging? if you're going to try and say I contradicted myself, you might aswell read my post properly

**DmanDmythDledge** · 23/05/2009, 8:09 PM

Originally Posted by Ezeikial

Stop digging Dodge - it only makes the hole bigger (no pun intended)!

It's kinda obvious. Debatable as it could have gone either way. Correct decision as Dodge believes the ref made the right call.

**Ezeikial** · 23/05/2009, 8:23 PM

Originally Posted by Dodge

Penalty he gave you was as debatable as any decision he gave our way (and nowhere near as crucial)

Originally Posted by Dodge

It was a penalty. Absolutely correct decision...

Originally Posted by Dodge

What digging? if you're going to try and say I contradicted myself, you might aswell read my post properly

Ok - I get it now!

Penalty was absolutely correct, but debatable....or is it that it was absolutely correct that it should be debated....or maybe that it is debatable if it was abolutely correct

Abolutely correct that this is not worth debating

**Dodge** · 23/05/2009, 8:32 PM

*sigh*

It was AS debatable as any other crucial decision the ref made.

The other decision were not debatable at all THEREFORE the penalty decision was not debatable

Sorry to bring it to this level, and sorry if it sounds patronisiong but you clearly can't understand it without me having to treat you like a child...

oh and PS jesus ****ing christ

**Ezeikial** · 23/05/2009, 8:50 PM

Originally Posted by Dodge

*sigh*

It was AS debatable as any other crucial decision the ref made.

The other decision were not debatable at all THEREFORE the penalty decision was not debatable

Sorry to bring it to this level, and sorry if it sounds patronisiong but you clearly can't understand it without me having to treat you like a child...

oh and PS jesus ****ing christ

Dodge - don't want to debate the ludicrous with you, but your posts are getting funnier!

Patronising - yes, but you have given me a good chuckle in the midst of depressing times!

**ps bohs** · 23/05/2009, 10:22 PM

Originally Posted by tiktok

...bees do it, even educated fleas do it.

In fairness, if Bohs do it, it must be the way forward, they have no financial issues.

people in glass houses ...............

**tiktok** · 24/05/2009, 12:26 PM

Originally Posted by ps bohs

people in glass houses ...............

All our windows are long since broken.

If I want to comment on how comical your financial situation is, I will. You can, in turn, comment on how comical Cork City's is. That's sort of the point of a discussion forum.
Keep taking it out on opposing fans though, that'll save you!

**pineapple stu** · 24/05/2009, 12:36 PM

Originally Posted by Dodge

In fairness the Star is usually right on LOI

You know what I mean though (copying chunks of foot.ie as news)

**Dodge** · 24/05/2009, 12:42 PM

Originally Posted by pineapple stu

You know what I mean though (copying chunks of foot.ie as news)

Fair enough, didn't actually know thats what you meant. Presumed you were having a pop at a tabloid

**pineapple stu** · 24/05/2009, 12:45 PM

Me? Never!

Just thought it was funny that it was rumoured here, dismissed as illiterate rubbish from someone with no connection to either party and then makes it into the Examiner.

**CarrickFan** · 24/05/2009, 8:09 PM

I believe it was me who may have started the Connor debate on this thread...sorry!!..i will just say he is a SPOOFER and should not be employed in EL football..knows feck all about football IMO...i suggest Dundalk get a pro-active manager for the club then fans wouldnt mind paying to see a decent team.

**Réiteoir** · 24/05/2009, 8:41 PM

Originally Posted by CarrickFan

I believe it was me who may have started the Connor debate on this thread...sorry!!..i will just say he is a SPOOFER and should not be employed in EL football..knows feck all about football IMO...i suggest Dundalk get a pro-active manager for the club then fans wouldnt mind paying to see a decent team.

I hear Alan Shearer may be available

**brianw82** · 24/05/2009, 8:46 PM

Originally Posted by Réiteoir

I hear Alan Shearer may be available

"Hey stranger, you're a tresspassin' on my dirtfarm."
"Er, do you happen to need a Messiah?"
"No, but I'll take them sacks o' money from ya!"

**ps bohs** · 24/05/2009, 10:38 PM

Originally Posted by tiktok

All our windows are long since broken.

If I want to comment on how comical your financial situation is, I will. You can, in turn, comment on how comical Cork City's is. That's sort of the point of a discussion forum.
Keep taking it out on opposing fans though, that'll save you!

Thanks for the advice , silly me thought you were taking the **** as opposed to commenting .