Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 101 to 111 of 111

Thread: Bohs exceeding 65%?

  1. #101
    International Prospect Ezeikial's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,072
    Thanked in
    663 Posts

    Bohemians to abide by Transfer Embargo

    It appears from this recent Belfast Telegraph piece, that Pat Fenlon has kindly agreed to abide by the transfer embargo:

    http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sp...-14305533.html


    Northern Ireland international Michael Gault will have talks with Portadown this week and it seems certain he will reject a three-year contract on the table at Windsor Park.
    Dundalk and Shamrock Rovers are also keen on the midfielder’s signature.

    “I can also confirm that Pat Fenlon advised me that an agent acting for Michael offered him to his Bohemians side but Pat assured me that he would not be signing him".

    It just goes to illustrate how much agents know about football!

  2. #102
    Reserves mrtndvn's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    286
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    18
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    22
    Thanked in
    17 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ezeikial View Post

    Cheating or just irresponsible? i
    Its clearly cheating what bohs are doing, the disappointing thing is that the club had the potential to do what Shamrock rovers are doing now but they are choosing to give pay rises to the likes of Deegan when there are rules in place that are supposed to prevent that.

    Throwing away the potential they had for a very bright future.
    Last edited by mrtndvn; 21/05/2009 at 1:22 PM.
    MD

  3. #103
    International Prospect Ezeikial's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,072
    Thanked in
    663 Posts

    Financial Implications of Salzburg draw for Bohs?

    What are the financial implications for Bohs of this draw, and in particular their ability to get under the 65% limit?

    Aidan Fitzmaurice in yesterdays Evening Herald Mondays states that €500,000 is on offer to Bohs to make it past the first hurdle.

    Obviously there is gate receipts and ancillary advertising/sponsorship, plus the possibility of good TV rights revenue, but this hardly amounts to this amount. Is there any further prize money available for progressing?

    On the subject of reducing costs Pat Fenlon is adamant that he is only interested in his players being transferred abroad.

    Presumably, apart from the possibility of getting transfer fees, this would allow him the best of both worlds - keep all his squad for the Salzburg matches, and then reduce his wage bill by off-loading abroad in late July.

    But if the financial rewards are as high as the €500,000 claimed, perhaps all 65% rule problems are solved by winning the tie?


    "If we need to sell players it's a case of trying to get as much as we can for them. Certainly, the players won't be leaving to go to clubs in this country on the cheap. That's for certain. If players have to go outside the country and we don't get the fees we demand, that's something we've got to look at. But it's a situation we're in that we have just got to deal with," he added

    Bohs fans were today making their travel plans for the first game in the Champions League, and with €500,000 on offer to Bohs if they can make it past the first hurdle in Europe, Fenlon admits there is pressure on him and his players to progress.
    http://www.herald.ie/sport/soccer/fe...s-1783597.html

  4. #104
    First Team HarpoJoyce's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2004
    Location
    www.ucdsupporters.ie
    Posts
    1,988
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    162
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    35
    Thanked in
    33 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ezeikial View Post
    ....
    Aidan Fitzmaurice in yesterdays Evening Herald Mondays states that €500,000 is on offer to Bohs to make it past the first hurdle.
    ......

    http://www.herald.ie/sport/soccer/fe...s-1783597.html
    I read €540,000 euro to get past RB Salzburg.

    There is a significant increase for Solidarity payments to clubs in the Champions League competition rfor 2009/10 as its the start of a new cycle.
    http://www.uefa.com/uefa/keytopics/k...id=814012.html
    "...Based on present revenue projections, this means that in season 2009/10 approximately €55m would be made available for redistribution to these clubs via the national associations and professional leagues – which is approximately €23m more than in the last season of the previous cycle. Including the additional allocations also made available to clubs from leagues with no participants in the UEFA Champions League, the solidarity pot will amount to approximately €67m.

    Eliminated clubs
    Additionally, the solidarity amounts paid to clubs eliminated in the qualifying stages of the UEFA Champions League and UEFA Europa League will also increase.
    ..."

    If its prize-money only it includes 3rd q. ties and the loser of that competes in the Europa League Play-off tie. But last year the FAI received €230,000 (approx.) in total Solidarity payments so I don't know how half million figure is reached.
    " I'll go right up to here,
    it can't possibly hurt.
    All they will find is my
    beer and my shirt."

  5. #105
    First Team
    Joined
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,155
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    198
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    280
    Thanked in
    186 Posts
    Things must be serious if they are giving out letters/ leaflets at Bohs matches (the EA semi final) with this wrote on it:

    ...“As you are aware, there is projected to be a considerable shortfall in the amount of income the club will have to earn in 2009 to remain within the 65% salary cap protocol. Sanction for breach of this protocol is relegation to the First Division”…

    The letter goes on to raise a few different initiatives to avoid suffering the penalty (seat sponsorship, direct debit, Fantasy Football).
    Wasn’t sure if I should post this, however as the leaflets were being handed out at a public event, and as this could have serious outcome on the rest of the league that I’d put it up.
    Manager: Fergal, have you your boots with ya?
    Fergal: Ya, I have them here.
    Manager: Ah good stuff, well give them to this man so, he forgot his!

  6. #106
    Reserves sligored's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    574
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    10
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    22
    Thanked in
    10 Posts
    post from last may below
    Quote Originally Posted by sligored View Post
    Mark Rossiter does not get wages from Bohs.

    He took an insurance payout when his professional contract ended with Sunderland due to his knee injury. Therefore he cannot now recieve financial reward for playing football as this was part of the settlement.
    He is paid big money for coaching instead of wages- another way of avoiding the 65% cap.
    Quote Originally Posted by niallsparky View Post
    Mark Rossiter is an amateur. He gets paid for some coaching he does. We are not allowed to sign him as a player because we would have to pay compensation to Sunderland with whom he terminated his contract due to injury.
    i told bohs fans this last may-its cheating the system . Let the powers that be decide . Dont blame fans of other teams for bringing it to the autorities attention if your mc is breaking the rule

  7. #107
    Capped Player Schumi's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    A difficult place to get three points
    Posts
    10,741
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    203
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    351
    Thanked in
    174 Posts
    If he actually does the coaching that he's getting paid for, I wouldn't think they are breaking the rules.
    We're not arrogant, we're just better.

  8. #108
    Youth Team
    Joined
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    163
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    14
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by sligored View Post
    post from last may below




    i told bohs fans this last may-its cheating the system . Let the powers that be decide . Dont blame fans of other teams for bringing it to the autorities attention if your mc is breaking the rule
    What was the point in dragging a thread up from 3 months ago to say that? You've highlighted the same point about this in the other thread already.

  9. #109
    Now with extra sauce! Dodge's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Insomnia
    Posts
    23,528
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    663
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,676
    Thanked in
    1,454 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Leejo View Post
    What was the point in dragging a thread up from 3 months ago to say that?
    Can't find online link

    Irish Daily Mail
    Thursday, November 26, 2009
    PHILIP QUINN

    THE BOH WAR!
    Champs fire back as Rovers question spending

    by PHILIP QUINN

    THEY may have been close in the Premier Division table, but
    relations between League of Ireland rivals Shamrock Rovers
    and Bohemians are today strained to breaking point.
    After the demise of Derry City and Kildare County, the latest image of the League is of its two most famous clubs engaged in a snarling catftght.
    Back-to-back champions Bohs are livid that their Dublin rivals
    have lodged an official complaint with the FAI querying their levels
    of spending since 2005.

    The Hoops have sought assurances from the FAI that bigspending Bohs have always stayed within the salary cap protocol that
    limits clubs to spending no more than 65 per cent of turnover on
    players' salaries. Rovers do not accuse Bohemians
    of anything untoward, nor do they offer any proof of wrongdoing, but
    it is clear they have misgivings about the sums their rivals spent
    between 2005 and 2008. Bohs official Gerry Conway is
    adamant the Gypsies have played things by the book but the FAI
    have taken note of Rovers' remarks and will be putting them to Bohs,
    and their club auditors, at their next meeting.
    Rovers have highlighted a number of areas of concern: specifically, the
    sums Bohs have spent on training facilities, on fielding under-age
    teams and in fund-raising, where their costs have jumped by 1,900
    per cent from 2005 to 2008. In their letter to the FAI's
    compliance officer, Padraig Smith, Rovers also point out that Bohs
    continue to have four members on their bar staff even though their sed from
    €77,000 in 2005 to €30,000 in 2008.

    They note that Rovers spent €428,555 on wages to their man-
    agement staff in 2008, an increase of 50 per cent, and managed to do
    all this while "keeping their salary spend on players within
    the FAI's 65 per cent limit. Rovers are puzzled that
    Bohs had to pay €190,000 for training facilities in 2008 —
    Rovers' own outlay is about €35,000, for facilities at Peamount and
    Sacred Heart in, Tallaght — and that covers their first team, A team and Under 20s.
    And they are mystified at how it cost . Bohs €130,000 'to run their
    schoolboy teams last year. In comparison, it cost Rovers 64,000 to
    field 22 teams, while Bohs run 15. Conway, the Bohs secretary, said
    he was 'outraged' at Rovers meddling in Bohs' financial affairs.
    'It's a bit rich that Rovers should be interfering into our business.
    This is a club who submitted false accounts a few years ago and went
    into examinership.
    'We've nothing to answer here. I'm fully satisfied we can stand
    over our figures. Our accounts are audited by auditors who operate
    under the laws of chartered accountants,' he added.
    Conway, who only became aware of Rovers' letter when contacted
    by Sportsmail yesterday, rebutted the points they raised.
    'The training facilities at DCU are among the best anywhere in
    the country. The arrangement we nave includes access to me
    elite athletic facilities also used by the Dublin footballers. We have access to
    dieticians, nutritionists, physios, doctors — and all that comes at a price.' Conway accepted the schoolboys outlay was steep but said the club forked
    out €60,000 in 2008 on kitting out teams.
    'There is nothing hidden there,' he vowed. 'We showed we spent over
    €1.9m on players' wages in 2008. How up front is that?' Ill-feeling has existed between the clubs for months but off-field issues were parked as the teams
    went toe for toe for the title. Rovers have felt a sense of resentment towards their northside rivals after they opposed the prestige friendly bringing Real Madrid in Tallaght in July.
    There was further discord when Bohs felt Rovers striker Graham
    Barrett was acting unofficially as a players' agent after allegedly
    approaching Brian Shelley about a possible move to the English
    League — a claim Rovers denied. Bohs also claimed midfielder
    Joseph Ndo was subjected to racist abuse from Rovers fans in
    last month's clash at Tallaght — the claim was unsubstantiated.
    According to Conway, Bohs have stayed constantly under the 65 per
    cent SCP limit but if the FAI's compliance department finds the
    sums don't add up, there could be repercussions for the Gypsies.
    FAI compliance chief Smith explained last night that the finan-
    cial statement submitted by Bohs for the year ending November 30,
    2008 had been signed off by auditors Whelan Bowling and Associ-
    ates, who said they presented a'true and fair view of the state of
    the company's affairs'. He added: 'While the comments
    forwarded to us by Shamrock Rovers present no evidence of
    financial irregularity, in keeping with the FAI's financial monitoring
    process we will raise these points during our next scheduled meeting
    with the club and their auditors.'

    The episode is the latest postscript to the financial morass into
    which the League has sunk. After the difficulties of former
    title winners Shelbourne, Cork City and Drogheda United in
    recent years, another scandal involving the champions is the last
    thing the League needs.

    ll! BOHS midfielder Joseph Ndo could be the first close-season
    signing for newly-promoted Sporting Fingal.

    HEY, BIG SPENDER
    Where Bohs'cash went in 2008
    Training expenses: €190,883
    (up €30,364 on 2007)
    Underage teams €130,816
    (up €114,971 on 200T)
    Fund-raising: €94,525
    (Up €89,875 on 2007)
    Team management and staff:
    €428,555 (up €139,116)
    54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
    ---
    New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
    LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/

  10. #110
    Youth Team
    Joined
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    163
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    14
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    http://foot.ie/forums/showthread.php?t=128682

    The post I'm referring to is the 82nd one, seems very needless and very "look at me" to highlight his point here when he's already made it in a newer thread that his point has more relevance to it...

  11. #111
    Now with extra sauce! Dodge's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Insomnia
    Posts
    23,528
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    663
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,676
    Thanked in
    1,454 Posts
    aye, just spotted it. Been away for the day
    54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
    ---
    New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
    LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Similar Threads

  1. V bohs
    By marty in forum Cobh Ramblers
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06/07/2009, 9:35 PM
  2. vs Bohs
    By Maz in forum Longford Town
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 27/05/2006, 1:13 PM
  3. Bus to bohs
    By ian in forum Cork City
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12/04/2005, 12:45 PM
  4. Bohs away
    By rep_dunford in forum Cork City
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 29/03/2005, 9:25 AM
  5. Bus to Bohs
    By Pablo in forum Cork City
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 17/12/2002, 11:33 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •