Looks like Derry a struggling a bit as well: http://www.derryjournal.com/derry-sp...nch.5301411.jp
#NeverStopNotGivingUp
To me, trying to hang any of this on the examiner or the examinership process looks like spoofing. If the new owner didn't carry out proper due diligence that's the new owners problem.
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
But he would have been aware that something was probably going to have to be paid arising from the case, and should have set aside some money for that contingency.Originally Posted by micls
I still think that comes back to the due diligence. There had to be the possibility of cases, and then the chances of success of those cases should've been looked into.
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
I think the Farrelly case was mooted on here at the time. If we knew about it, I'm pretty sure Coughlan ought to have known about it. Especially if he conducted a proper due diligence. That's the whole point of due diligence - to see what skeletons are lurking.
In any case, why are CCFC being sued over actions taken by the examiner?
did not think it was possible but this process is draging the league down further and further and the teams we are supposed to look to as the models for professional football are nothing more than a joke
I wish i did not know then what I dont know now
The way the Examiner sacked Farrelly is a sign that he is not infallible as seems to be suggested by some people.
But has it not been said somewhere that if Tommy does not pay the tax that FORAS will not come in(or be able to come in) to save the club ?
Lets say if the club doe cease to exist what happens with all the FORAS money ? rebuild a self sustainable well structured club or what ?
I also reckon FORAS should have student memberships for those of us still in school and going into 3rd level.
Bookmarks