You could be right to the extent that the football has set its own bar with 3 WC qualifications, the rugby team until now had yet to achieve those heights and still has a WC to look forward to as we've never done anything beyond average at a rugby WC.Originally Posted by paul_oshea
You are not using consistent figures.
You chose the constant (watched the whole game non stop) viewing figure for Cyprus football at 517,000 yet the average figure for the others. Read your sources again. You can't compare both.
A football match has been the biggest sporting event on RTE for at least 17 of the past 20 years.
For a like with like comparison I prefer
http://www.medialive2.com/television...september.html
They do just use adults of 15+ but at least it is a consistent measurement.
Now the biggest sporting event according to this was Munster v NZ with Ireland v Cyprus coming 2nd.
They don't have figures up yet for 2009.
The Cyprus figures were better than both All Irelands but ecclipsed by the rugby.
furthermore the football was live on Sky Sports also and watched by many. Anecdotally football would also has a much higher pub viewership numbers.
First of all, lets make the assumption that most of us posting here would be "Soccer" fans first and foremost - our devotion to the cause is unwavering win, lose or draw.
Lets re-iterate that the thread title is discussing the wider Irish publics support.
Taking that into account, its fair to say that the "Soccer" World Cups truly caught the general publics imagination to a far greater degree than any other sporting events.
This was partly due to us appearing at a genuinely World celebrated event - not effectively a tournament comprising of Ireland, Britain, France and current minnows Italy.
I think you'll find the public interest will rise if the team can continue to gather points towards qualification.
Quoting years at random since 1975
What about the people who watch the Ireland games on Sky? Are they included in that list above.
Always look on the bright side of life
From a participation point of view, the reality is that the schools network is rugbys bedrock in Ireland and considering that most if not all of those are private pay schools a very large portion of the country is excluded. I know there are exceptions to this, ie certain areas of cork, limerick city etc are very strong rugby strongholds, but it is only in recent years that we have seen players emerge from less 'privileged' backgrounds.
Football on the other hand is a working class game, open to all. This is another reason why i dont think the success of rugby will be a significant difference from a financial sponsorship point of view. Rugby has a middle to upper class following that provide substantial financial backing no matter how well/poorly the Irish team is performing.
They are not.
See my post above too as he has taken constant figures for football and average figures for GAA and peak figures for other sports. Lies damned lies and statistics.
I presume the rugby is on both BBC & RTE though, so do RTE's rugby figures only tell half the story?
By the way, how are viewing figures actually compiled anyway?
A very good thread.
A few things
The notion of bandwagon jumper is far from unique to Irish Sport. Success breeds media interest which lures in first the casual fan and then the sheep. I watched the last RWC in a pub in Oxford, it was the 3rd one we tried to get into, it was jammed I had to explain rule after rule to England "fans" around me particularly the "On the line is out" one!!
Second point is the growth of rugby has been going for a decade or so and this will obviously add to it, it has started to move away from the traditional private schools and more into the mainstream. I grew up i na GAA town, but I played more soccer than GAA, our local schools (1 convent, 1 Vocational) were GAA only but they merged and in the last decade have beome almost exclusively Rugby playing. Not only that but there is now a local club and they have an underage scheme which involves kids from Under 8 upwards.
Lastly, I think a lot of Rugby's growth is to do with the success of Munster & to a lesser degree Leinster, the 4 professional provinces play to a high standard in competitve leagues and between 3 of the 4 contain over 95% of our international teams. Despite the improvement in the LOI there is no way yo ucan say the league is attractive as say Munster v Leicester at Thomnd Park or Leinster v Toulose at the RDS. The opportunity for fans to watch what is widely perceived as the Chamipons League equivalent on their own doorstep has generated interest in Rugby unheard of 10+ years ago.
While I don't doubt that football audience figures on the way down I think it is not as great as mentioned above. People like to see winners & Munster & Ireland are now winning big games. Champions League doesn't get big figures until later stages.RTE 2 Base: Adults - Top 20 Network 2 TV figures for 2008
Rank Title Date Time TVR 000's
1 Rugby: Munster v All Blacks Nov 18 1900 18.1 624
3 World Cup 2010 Qualifiers - Soccer Oct 15 1900 13.3 459
4 Six Nations 2008 - Rugby Ave: 3 1652 12.9 427
5 The Sunday Game Live Ave: 5 1524 12.6 434
6 World Cup 2010 Qualifiers - Soccer Sep 10 1731 12.2 422
7 World Cup 2010 Qualifiers - Soccer Sep 06 1630 10.9 377
9 Autumn International Rugby Ave: 3 1709 9.9 342
11 International Soccer Friendly May 29 1933 8.9 307
12 The Sunday Game Live Ave: 5 1230 8.7 300
14 Euro 2008 Finals - Soccer Ave: 19 1859 8.3 287
15 Champions League Live - Soccer Ave: 25 1900 8.1 274
17 Six Nations 2008 - Rugby Ave: 4 1458 7.9 262
18 Six Nations 2008 - Rugby Ave: 6 1227 7.5 249
Ireland v Italy next Wednesday will get very large figures - watch this space.
Good post. I agree with almost all you say, especially the point that the Saipan saga may have been the beginning of a shift away from one crucial characteristic which marked us apart from the rest of the world i.e. the teams' relationship with the fans and the loyalty/sense of honour which came from that.
Interesting point on Croke Park too, it just hasn't felt right up to now. Hopefully Saturday might change this, the late kick-off might be an important factor with people probably fairly jarred going to the game, might improve the atmosphere. (cant remember when was the last competitive game at home that started so late on a Saturday) Also the feelgood factor after the Slam/Dunne fight I hope will carry over.
Don't agree with you saying any other country would tell S. Ireland to get lost and ban him from playing again. Scholes turned his back on England a bit early and they asked him back. The Dutch are constantly throwing players out of squads only for them to re-appear once the manager gets the bullet. Michael Laudrup missed out on Denmark winning the euros in 92 because of a row as well. He came back to set a record for international caps and went on to manage at national level I think. Having said that, just because other international teams tolerate this sort of behaviour, doesn't mean that we should. If I was Delaney, I would ban Ireland for good and clarify the issue once and for all.
Le monde est a nous
This is a very relevant point. I'm not putting down the efforts of the LOI clubs but punters nowadays only want to see the very best whether its a sporting occasion or a concert or any entertainment.
Rugby is making inroads into traditional football and GAA areas. I know one very accomplished kid (both football and GAA) who was offered a rugby scholarship to a fee paying school, despite never playing organised Rugby in his life.
Always look on the bright side of life
Im probably going to open a minefield but does anyone feel that the rugby example is one that football should look towards.
In reality considering the size of this country, it is very hard to maintain a high standard professional league in any sport, but particulary in football with the number of clubs and the foreign competition.
I know there are Uefa rules etc etc but in time the possibility of a celtic league of ROI/NI/Welsh/Scottish teams in 2/3 leagues. I firmly believe it would be a more sustainable model. Yes it would result in a reduction in the top level Irish clubs (akin to rugby) but going with the bandwagon theory say an Irish team does well in this celtic league qualifies for the CL and with the more finanicial clout they would possess as a result of the new league, they would undoubtedly be a stronger team and thus have a greater chance of progress to the CL proper. Success breeds success and with that interest.
I agree with the sentiments expressed in the last paragraph of the above post. In my opinion, it is the professionalism and success of the Provinces that are key to rugby's sustained and continued growth in this country. They are more crucial to this whole equation, more so than the national team. I have to say that I welcome rugby's growth wholeheartedly and am glad that Ireland can attain and hopefully sustain a stature in a sport which has an albeit limited, in comparison to football, but definate international standing. I live in NI and it has certainly grown here, but I will put forward a certain caveat and say that I feel that rugby's growth in prominence will be more at the expense of the GAA than football. Significantly - this has already been remarked upon here.
Rugby as an entity is definately developing a place in the national psyche. This is very important. Through successive 6 nations campaigns, Munster's European Cup campaigns, their stunning match against the All-Blacks, having players like O'Driscoll and O'Connell - players at the pinnacle of their sport, have all contributed to this. For me, it's place in the nation's affections has become secure and will not significantly diminish.
Football, as Ciaran has already said, will always have great significance because it is the simpliest game. That is it's beauty. It's place is also secure. The Euro '88, Italia '90 and USA '94 campaigns have a place in our nation's collective memory and consciousness that no other sport will ever equal. They can and will return, because the World Cup provides a platform that no other entity can equal. It's stature and place in the world is unmatched - even by the Olympics. I believe that another golden era is coming for the national side, where once again football will take precedence in the nation's affections. It's just a pity that that the domestic league set-up can never consistently sustain this.
While comments about the standing and example shown by our rugby players, relative to that of our football players, are all very pertinent in this discussion, I for one have taken great heart and pride in the example shown by Aiden McGeady and James McCarthy. Both players elected to represent the nation of their heritage and heart over that of their birth, and both have subjected to disgusting and sustained sectarian abuse in Scotland because of it. Both have displayed, for people so young, considerable courage and fortitude. I applaud them! I would encourage Stephen Ireland to take note of their example.
Anyway.....................whatever about rugby's and football's standing in the nation, I believe that their growth, as I wrote earlier, has been more at the expense of the GAA than of each other and in my view, this will continue to be the case (...........and sure that's not a bad thing).
Last edited by The Fly; 24/03/2009 at 3:33 PM.
Fair enough, then explain the popularity of Gaelic Football which is about about top quality and glamourous as bog snorkling.
Hurling is class yes, but look how that is dying on its feet as the GAA has put 90% of their efforts into promoting gaelic over the far superior and quality sport of hurling. That tells you all you need to know.
Also most RTE staff and management are products of Leinster Rugby schools and they are looking after their own and always have even before the proviences. For decades they would have cameras at AIB league games with a handful of barristers standing under a couple of umbrellas while a Rovers-Bohs cup match over in Dalymount with 5,000 supporters got a mentioned after they read out the result of the Queen of the South versus Montrose match.
The Irish go with what the telly man and hack tells them. If enough RTE pundits, non-sports commentors, parish priests, headmasters and TDs waxed lyrically about LOI they way they do about gaelic football LOI grounds would be packed every weekend.
Last edited by Boh_So_Good; 24/03/2009 at 3:06 PM.
That's another gripe I have. At least the IRFU and the FAI do something for Ireland on the world stage. The LOI has even done far more to fly the Irish flag (and with increasing distinction in recent years) and gets no thanks.
Meanwhile all kinds of pundits mouth off about how wonderful an organisation the GAA even while some of them are dangling out of trees in Waterford with their pockets stuffed with 500 Euro notes or being dragged into the courthouse on bookkeeping iregularities. The FAI no matter what are always called "idiots" by the same pundits.
This is why I have always beleive that the GAA should get the least funding as not only is it a limited idiosyncratic oddity at best on the international stage, but the aparthide nature of the GAA in relation into waging propganda wars on "other codes" among vast swathes of this nation's youth robs our country of all kinds of athletes who could be competing on the world stage in any number of sports rather than hoofing around in the muck in rural Donegal during some pointless grudge match between to parishes.
Frankly it is a miracle we can compete in any sport considering the death hold the GAA has on young people all over this country trying to stifle their potential to represent their country in any other sports. This to me explains why we are so terrible at Olymipics - our medal winners are mucking about in the "passionate" encounter between Saint Ballyspittles Pipers versus Fr Flannagan Novena Kickhams in some godforsaken field somewhere.
Anyways I am getting off topic. Bandwagon jumping and unfair media coverage/government funding is what still detemines the fate of sporting "codes" in this republic.
They want to see a big occasion. Thats why every summer 82,000 go to see the Dubs play someone like Louth. I'm a football person, have coached, managed and played at a decent level. But when it comes to colour, athmosphere and hype, the Dubs and Heineken Cup games and to a lesser extent Magners League leave the LOI well in its wake. Sad but true.
The only way we are going to match that is if there is a Celtic League with 2 or possibly 3 Irish teams competing in it. Otherwise we will have to content ourselves with the LOI and watch hundreds of Irish people travelling to Britain to get their fix of association football.
Always look on the bright side of life
To a limited point you are correct.
However the same people never apply the same standards to things such as the rampant sickening sectarianism of the Celtic support in this country which is considered almost "adorable" to the many financial issues in the Premiership.
If more Irish people went to LOI games, there would be increased financial stability due to a decent cash flow into our internal national enconomy rather than handing it to Murdoch and Co.
There is nothing wrong with the LOI that isn't happening in other sports and leagues, the issue is the big magnifying glass of the media loves to point it at the LOI constantly.
If the books were opened on the GAA, I beleive we would find levels of corruption and political imcomptence which would make the LOI look like a quakers tea party. When the taxpayer bails you out everytime, it is easy to be perfect.
Good thing you don't support the national team so or you'd be accused of hypocracy
On the flip side Ciaran, having seen what happened in Saipan you'd think it could never happen again in Irish sport, yet the IRFU did as good a job as possible at copying it during the calamitous WC07 campaign, including the preparation. The report published in response was a whitewash of epic proportions that put the original Genesis Report in the shade.
The IRFU is certainly to be commended in its opportunism. However the same opportunity was and probably never will be available to the FAI. I doubt we'll ever be able to keep our best footballers in Ireland playing regularly against top class players from other countries week in week out. Football is so much bigger overseas that money will always be higher. This isn't the case in rugby. Also, strong national leagues among our neighbours and international club competitions are long established in football and even if there was a commercial or footballing need or demand for a Magners League among the lesser football nations, UEFA probably wouldn't sanction it. Elroy aluded to this above.
I personally feel that a degree of cross-border competition may actually be the "solution", despite how many noses would be put out by it.
A blog piece on foot.ie seems to put the FAI in a good light re-licensing etc. If the FAI is to be believed there really has been a shift to state of the art governance structures in the Irish game.
Just one side of the argument but valid nonetheless...
Last edited by Stuttgart88; 24/03/2009 at 4:07 PM.
Anyone see Kevin Myers today comparing the Grand Slam win with a Norway win in cross-country skiing? Big for them but it'd go unnoticed in most of the sporting world. He has a point!
Posting Permissions
Quote
Bookmarks