I was thinking about this when I went home last night, and I think I've been less than clear, probably because I didn't have the argument coherently in my head.
The discussion I have seen seems to be between one side which says that the government should not (implicitly ever) fund third level, and another side that says that they should fund it. Bald Student correctly pointed out that the real issue is whether it is reasonable to reduce or suspend funding for third level give the current financial situation, and I'm much more amenable to this.
Macy, people are already taxed based on how much they earn. The education provided at third level increases the total income and therefore the total tax revenue in the country. It does this in a progressive way. Taxing graduates just means that wealthy people will pay for private education (here or abroad) and the children of lower and middle class folks will pay more over their lifetime for no reason. That, or we tax all graduates regardless of how and where they were trained, which makes engineers and scientists even more expensive here and screws us in terms of international competitiveness.
Bookmarks