In fairness I'm with Rovers maniac on this. Very serious illness and some of the comments here are at best in poor taste
54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
---
New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/
Alan Mathews family are not going hungry ffs. He just picked up a 50k bonus. He was paid ridiculous money for a years works.
Now this isnt his fault, wed all have taken it and if the court decides he's due more then fair enough.
BUT I hope they side with us, as Id imagine any other LOI fan in the position would.
And Ndrog, you must be having a laugh right? If the court hadn't sided with ye regarding payments you wouldn't have a club now....I'm sure you were wishing they didn't though.
If you're responding to Razor I think what he meant was that Farrelly didn't have cancer(luckily), which he didn't. He had a tumour but it wasn't cancerous.
On the Mathews thing, loads of City fans have heard his threats and rumours from when he was still our manager.
I had huge respect for how he acted when the everything went wrong but dont be naive. If he'd walked away at that stage he'd have lost 4 months wages and a 50k Setanta cup bonus. Its to easy to walk away from a possible 100k, he had motivation to stay. But regardless he did a great job and gained huge respect from us.
His actions since though leave a sour taste
Would relegation to the First be the end of this sequel of the Cork series? They must have one of the higher wage bills in the Premier, how the hell would that work in the first? I'm sure players wouldn't just agree to leave.
Lets redefine what it means to heal
2 pages in the sun this morning about Farrelly plus it states there are 3 other players due money by Cork. The FAI have washed their hands off the Farrely case which seems incredible.
We are the Galway Boys Stand up and make some noise"
Especially as they most certainly did not wash their hands of other ex-employees at other clubs. No consistency as ever.
Upwards to the vanguard where the pressure is too high.
The FAI also state "...Cork City... were given licences on the basis that financial commitments they have made will be honoured within the agreed dates before the start of the 2009 season."
So if the financial commitments are not to players, what are to? Surely all other debt was cleared/payed during examinership
54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
---
New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/
"Must you tell me all your secrets when it's hard enough to love you knowing nothing."
http://worddok.blogspot.com
Sorry, you didn't give a link so I presumed mine was more up to date (yours wasn't on website)
54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
---
New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/
Actually reading that now...
FAI response
Seems to me that Farrelly is still owed money
54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
---
New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/
Well I'm not a legal eagle but the FAI wording certainly indicates that there was a debt owed but seeing as he circumvented licensing, there's nothing they could do
I'm not getting into whether he was or wasn't
54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
---
New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/
Not the way I read it. He'd have an agreement in place to get it. That could be a tenner a week, could be a grand a week.
Read the statement again carefully. You haven't defaulted on the initial payments yet but it certainly isn't clear that all players have all their money.
Originally Posted by FAI
Hunky Dorys Park - could be worse, we could be going to Old Trafford every other week
Why the hell should we know this stuff inside out. Do you think the examiner gave us classes on what was going on. I'm saying nothing about Gareth Farrelly. All I'm pointing out is that the FAI statement can be interpreted such that some (ex) Cork players are still owed money but the FAI accepted the schedule of payments.
Seeing as you know so much, when is Alan Matthews getting his €200k? And also tell Doolo to stop wearing Drogs gear.
Hunky Dorys Park - could be worse, we could be going to Old Trafford every other week
Whatever about the legality of it, not paying Farrelly because he was ill is pretty reprehensible morally. I appreciate that the examiner had to be ruthless, but this is exactly the sort of thing that should see clubs who go down the examinership route severely punished due to the damage to the league's reputation.
#NeverStopNotGivingUp
G.F. wasn't let go because he was ill. He was offered the same deal as other staff i.e. 30% of their wages initally by the examiner and he refused thus leaving the examiner with no option but to dispense with his services in the same way as he dispensed with the services of the assistant manager, general manager, commercial manager and club shop staff - all of whom weren't given the option of the 30% of wages.
Ask not what your club can do for you but what YOU can do for your club.
This sums it up really. He was treated the same as everyone else and this was all done by the examiner.
The club had no say in it and Tom Coughlan certainly has nothing got to do with it.
Its not nice but its part and parcel of examinership. id imagine Farrelly knows he doesnt have much of a case, hence the running to the press.
I'd agree with Mr. A's point though about the punishment.
Bookmarks