For me the playmaker is the guy that sets the tempo of his teams play and always makes himself available to receive a pass no matter where on the pitch his teammate has the ball. So Keane was very much a playmaker. In fact, Scholes has only really become a playmaker since Keane left. He was more of a Lampard type player years ago.
/edit - seems like BarelyLegal has the exact same definition of a playmaker as me.![]()
A that dreaded rolleyes icon. Always confuses me.
You do realize wikipedia can be edited by anyone at anytime right?
redundant creche?
I thought you were off the drink Ronnie?
"No, I drink to help me mind my own business....can I get you one? (c) Ronnie Drew
Excellent post.
As far as I can see, in the modern game out wide players are becoming a thing of the past. Very few goals these days come from players running the touchline and whipping the ball in, instead we see a lot of central midfielders or wingers with a tendancy to cut inside in the top scorer lists. The majority of top clubs rely on a central midfielder who scores goals... and when this player isn't scoring the team isn't doing too well, case in point Fabregas.
It's a pity our best asset in this department and one who is very very effective in the role is a complete ****.
Totally agree with yourself and Stutts. If you were designing a formation that played to the strengths of our best players it would not be 4-4-2. Doyle, Keane, McGeady, Ireland (I know, I know......) Andy Reid etc have the technique, mobility and intelligence to be a real handful at international football, but not in a system that forces us down tramlines and gives our strikers the wrong sort of service.
I think it's John Sheridan, a very underrated player.
I heard it was Felchester Rovers that Mick played for
Robert Redford ? I think that's a bit of an indecent proposal, he's a bit too old now. Forget sneakers, he couldn't even play barefoot in the park. Calling him up would be a bridge too far, an indication of the way we were...
Bookmarks