Your main asset was held in the name of the company that ran up huge debts, which I'm saying was silly to begin with. For the point of that argument, the precise details (freehold, leasehold) are irrelevant. You're now complaining that you couldn't go into examinership because of your own stupidity. If you want to argue that (the "more information" you said wasn't forthcoming), fire ahead. If you want to erupt in empty hysterics again, then good luck to you.
Bookmarks