Whether you agree with them or not is irrelevant.
If you state you have a clear understanding of the FIFA statutes why would you quote article 16 to support your contention?
It's irrational.
Ealing Green has already vainly tried to argue the validity of article 16 and you can guess where that ended up.
The OWC board after about 200 pages (a bit slow up there) finally conceeded that article 16 did not apply.
Now, do we have the last man standing who believes in Article 16?
Not even the IFA believe in Article 16. As dumb and all as the IFA are on this issue, not even they argue Article 16.
The IFA in their wisdom decided that article 17 must apply. Article 17, the one to do with acquired nationality. The IFA are much smarter that those who argue for article 16, the IFA decided to use the same argument that has already failed before
Automatic Nationality without residence requirements, as stated in article 15, is what is applied to 6 county born declaring for the Republic.For players from NI wanting to play for the South, nationality isn't enough in itself for eligibility
The FAI have the perfect right to make young Irish nationals born in the 6 Counties aware of their national team options and select those who put themselves forward for selection, like the 3 or 4 Derry lads in the last year.




Quote
ya i am a nerd) over and over again, at least isn't it keeping interest in the board for those that want to debate it, from both sides of the footballing and/or political divide. Any converse, is good converse in my opinion anyway.
You might even find that there is a little nugget of info that you didn't expect to find, even if its just a good one liner phrase, if not then just choose to ignore the thread, you have to see the irony of what you posted, just liike sideshow bob saw the irony when he used the TV as the medium to tell everyone he was going to blow up the whole world because they watched too much TV, no?


Bookmarks